An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

All Aboard For The Republican Right-Wing’s Flagellation Station Express

01aaaflagellation.jpg

Lordy be! In only six days the angry mantra of the John McCain-Sarah Palin campaign will be silenced. You know the one I’m talking about: That some of us are not true Americans because of where we live, what we do for a living, where we went to school and, horror or horrors, because we support a Muslim terrorist for president.

But you can bet your dangling chad that while we will be filling this welcome void by beginning the arduous task of pulling America from the smoldering ashes of the Age of Bush, the angry flagellation that has recently broken out among the holiest of the Republican right-wing holy will intensify.

This writ large is their own version of the McCain-Palin mantra, only here it’s real Republicans vs. elitist Republicans.

Wall Street Journal
columnist Peggy Noonan is among those already being lashed for having the temerity to not only part ways with President Bush, but with his wannabe successor, as well. Same for former Bush speechwriter David Frum and the lengthening list of GOP bigs who have endorsed Barack Obama, most prominently the tribally traitorous Colin Powell.

“We won’t tolerate those sorts of people on our sinking ship, and it is our sinking ship. Leave us to drown in peace!” is how conservative pundit Daniel Larison mockingly puts it.

This whips-and-chains vaudeville show reminds us that the Republican Party is precariously close to toppling into the abyss where reside Rush Limbaugh and the twentysomething percent of Americans who still believe that Bush is doing a heck of a job.

* * * * *

Poor Bobby Jindal.

It seems like only yesterday that the Louisiana governor was being described as a rising star in the Republican firmament. But after the smear job that the lynch mob has done on Obama it’s difficult to see room being made for a dark skinned guy with a funny name on future national tickets.

* * * * *

The pundits at National Review Online, the cyberchild of the magazine founded by conservative Republican godfather William F. Buckley Jr., have spent the last few months piddling on his grave as they have relentlessly bloviated about Obama while completely missing the big picture.

From Obama’s fleeting relationship with Bill Ayers to claims he is a socialist and/or communist to comparisons to Hitler and Munich 1939 to whether his birth certificate is genuine, the NRO gang has prattled on and on . . . and on and on. So enamored of the smell of their own self-righteous holes have they been that they never paused to consider that while culture warring and character assassination might have worked in 2000 and 2004, 2008 is a whole different ball game.

This is on full display in Pennsylvania. Although McCain has made it his “firewall” state, he is spinning his wheels in the voter-rich Philadelphia suburbs because families there are a whole lot more concerned about making ends meet than whether Obama is the demon spawn in a coat and tie.

* * * * *

We also have the folks at NRO, along with their fellow travelers at the Weekly Standard, to thank for their role in Sarah Palin’s star turn.

During the summer of 2007, cruises sponsored by these august journals docked in Alaska and editors and writers trooped up to the governor’s mansion where they, almost to a man, fell madly in love with a woman who has become become the Lizzy Borden of the McCain campaign.

It is not just that William Kristol, Fred Barnes and Rich Lowry, among other bright conservative journalistic lights, were smitten by a woman whose utter absence of substance was not off putting, but their man crushes continue even as reports multiply that Palin has gone rogue and is at war with the Old Guy. Kristol in particular is righteously indignant that the object of his affections is getting such lousy treatment in the Lower 48.

The joke, of course, is on them.

Because while Palin has little chance of being a force in 2012, her fierce anti-intellectualism has short-term appeal and she is bound to be a player in the ongoing disintegration of the Republican Party, which with her help has a fighting chance to go from having a lock on power in Washington to a political anorexic whose power base consists of Deep South states in hardly any time at all.

Image: “Flagellation of Christ” by Ludovico Carracci

  • ktschiaf
    Actually, the joke is on the American people who have been blinded by the spotlight shining upon their great deceptor, Obama. Thank goodness, though, that folks are waking up as evidenced of those all around talking of how He won't ever just stick to the truth, but instead keeps changing it to suit his immediate needs. You say he had a fleeting relationship with Ayers, but the truth is they have been friends for 20 years. And what about his relationship withKhalidi. Surely you wouldn't call that fleeting. This man was the voice of the PLO and he babysat the Obama children. I don't think the joke will be so funny for you when you finally wake up.
  • jdave
    Shaun,

    I like what you write and things in general here at TMV. I must take issue with you here though.

    To use this image in such a frivolous way is offensive to many devout Christians. I don't want a theocracy. I revere both Christ and the Establishment clause in the constitution as well as your free speech rights. So while you have the right to say what you will about Christianity, I can also respectfully ask you to be more sensitive to the things we find holy. Please remove this image immediately.
  • shaun
    jdave:

    I appreciate your sensitivity, but find it off putting that you believe certain works of art in the public domain -- in this case a most famous one -- should not be allowed to be viewed except in a context that hews to your own strict parameters. I have used not dissimilar images in posts on the Bush administration's embrace of torture and will continue to do so when appropriate.
  • DLS
    Shaun, hopefully you'll calm down after the election (assuming McCain doesn't miraculously win).

    The finger-pointing among ideological conservatives and partisan Republicans has been deliberately withheld at least since (and during) the Republican convention, but it and the frustration and the resentment and everything else is like a spring being compressed or stretched (tensioned) and the forces will be released shortly after the election.

    As to your depiction, it is Obama that is the blindly faithful's Messiah this year as well as so many's American Idol candidate.
  • jdave
    Shaun,

    I thought I made it clear that you are allowed and have every right to do exactly as you did.

    I asked that you be more sensitive to things that some people find holy. It isn't a matter of copyright, or legality. It is a matter common decency and respect for the beliefs of others.
  • Manchester2
    Shaun,

    Truly, you jest when you say that the McCain-Palin ticket claims that those supporting Sen. Obama "support a Muslim terrorist for President." Do you have a YouTube clip of Sen. McCain saying this, maybe a Gov. Palin quote from a magazine article? About the closest you'd be able to come are admittedly pathetic forwarded e-mails from who knows who, or maybe a Sean Hannity Fox News piece that goes over the top. As you know - and as was satirized on SNL - a woman at a recent McCain rally suggested in a question-answer session that Sen. Obama was an "Arab." Sen. McCain corrected her pointedly, publicly, and swiftly.

    Please correct your misleading statement.
  • AustinRoth
    jdave - you cannot appeal to someone's higher sense of decency unless that sense of decency first exists within them.

    Even as an atheist, I agree that using this image to visually equate the Bush administration to Pontius Pilate and his Roman soldiers torturing Christ is in exceptionally poor taste. It lacks the appropriate level of proportion, unless you want to assume equivalency between Christ and his Apostles and Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida.
  • shaun
    Manchester2:

    You are engaging in precisely the kind of disingenuous "we never said that although we said that" cant that the campaign and their surrogates are using.

    Of course neither McCain nor Palin said outright that Obama was a Muslim terrorist, but it has been said over and over and over and over . . . and over and over that his religious and patriotic bona fides are suspect and the implication is very clear to everyone -- obviously excepting yourself.
  • AustinRoth
    shaun - it is you that is being disingenuous, and quite frankly misrepresenting your own words, "the angry mantra of the John McCain-Sarah Palin campaign will be silenced. You know the one I’m talking about: That some of us are not true Americans because of where we live, what we do for a living, where we went to school and, horror or horrors, because we support a Muslim terrorist for president."

    That flat out states the McCain campaign is pushing such ideas, despite the evidence from McCain's own words that he does not support anyone associated with his campaign, or even supporters at rallies, saying such things.

    You are also now saying anything negative said about Obama is to be laid at the feet of the McCain campaign, while on numerous occasions in the recent past defending any negative utterances against the McCain/Palin campaign as not coming directly from Obama, and therefore it was a 'Rovian dirty trick' to try and make it seem so.

    You speak out of both sides of your mouth way too often. At times, I try to be civil towards you and your pathological rantings, but when you keep venturing into "homeless person screaming in your face" mode, it only reminds me again of the pity I feel for your decline as a journalist and commentator.

    As always,
    your personal troll
  • Manchester2
    Shaun:

    Yes, Gov. Palin said that Sen. Obama was "palling around with terrorists," (and BTW, I thought Obama's schtick on this at the comedy dinner in Manhatta was a hoot!) Palin's comment inched up to the line, but apparently, you think that line was crossed. Other than that debatable reference, can you document your sweeping claim with a link? Your readers deserve one.
  • Rudi
    Here's a link to the Larison post: Sinking ship.

    In a related note, this current post fits into the silly religious theme:
    Enough already
    What is it about this election that causes people to say absolutely crazy things? John McCain is a tsaddik! John McCain is like Tsar-Martyr Nikolai! What profound confusion or monomania can people suffer from that allows them to compare blithely one of the worst presidential candidates in my lifetime to revered and holy figures? I would not show disrespect to my Catholic friends by comparing the ridiculous members of our political class, particularly one known for his reflexive support for wars that have directly harmed Catholic communities in the Near East, to Blessed Karl of Austria for any reason. Endorse McCain as the lesser of two evils if you must, but spare us the sacrilege.

    On the specific policy matter at hand, there is an assumption here that the so-called Freedom of Choice Act would pass the House in which conservative Democrats make up a fifth of the majority. This is a very questionable assumption, to say the least.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC