An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Republicans Against Proposition 8

The common perception is that the GOP is anti-gay. While there are many Republicans who are homophobic, there are also many who are very gay-friendly and willing to stand up for gay rights and, in this case, against Proposition 8, the proposal that would ban gay marriage in California.

One such person is Tom Campbell a former Republican legislator in California. He says:

Republicans believe deeply that government should be limited. Government has no business making distinctions between people based on their personal lives. That’s why, as a Californian and a Republican who has held elective office at the federal and state levels, I will be voting No on Proposition 8…

We’ve seen the walls fall down that once stood against women’s rights; the same has been true for racial equality. When my mother was born, women still couldn’t vote in many states. When I entered school, black and white couples couldn’t get married in many states. It’s easy to forget those things, but it wasn’t all that long ago. Someday, we’ll tell our children that, when two adults in our state who wanted to get married were told they couldn’t, we had the chance to change that. I want to be able to tell the next generation that I was part of ending discrimination, not making it a permanent part of the law.

It’s important that Republicans stand up to the discriminatory forces.

Log Cabin Republicans of California has taken part in the effort against Proposition 8 called Republicans Against 8. They have released two ads, including this one called “Backwards:”

Cheers to Campbell and other straight Republicans for their willingness to stand up for people like myself and my partner.

Crossposted at NeoMugwump.

  • jeff_pickens
    Dennis, over at The Dish, Andrew Sullivan has been following this issue for several days. Interestingly, the LDS Church has been majorly funding the proposition, and in fact it has become a divisive issue within the LDS church members, which is historically interesting. There are church leadership who feel that this issue is potentially the most divisive issue that has ever hit the church in its history. It will be interesting to see how it plays out. Of course this issue has hit the Episcopalians and Lutherans with national attention to both as well, but only in respect to who should get to wear a clerical collar. Andrew provides a link where financial support can be mailed to help put out the word to defeat this proposition.

    Having a cousin in a loving relationship with his spouse for over 10 years, and seeing how they are raising a child together and overcoming enormous resistance with almost every step of their lives together here in Texas, I commend all who take a stand on favoring equal rights for gay and lesbian relationships. And I applaud these brave citizens of both parties who stand up for people, instead of tremble at the thought of opposing religious dogma.
  • henrytabatha
    Yes on 8 does not equal homophobic
    Yes on 8 does not equal homophobic

    I have friends who engage in premartial (heterosexual) sex, which I consider "sinful", but I love them, and treat them as equals. However, if a law was made that considered my objections as hate-speech, my rights would be curtailed.

    This issue is the same thing. No on prop 8 is NOT EQUALITY FOR ALL It takes away my right to object.

    And teaching gay marriage in schools doesn't have to be in sex educaiton or special "marriage educaiton" classes. If my son's math homework said "Jim's husband bought two apples, they used to have 1. How many do they have now?" I would object. Would the court support me? Not if prop 8 doesn't pass.

    whatisprop8.com
  • FlagDoc
    As a American I take pride in our system of checks and balances. That system was demonstrated in May 2008 when the Republican dominated Californian Supreme Court ruled on Gay Marriage with a 4-3 ruling declaring that the state Constitution protects a fundamental “right to marry” that extends equally to same-sex couples. I can’t believe that any American would support a Constitutional Amendment that is designed to “Eliminate” rights. Americans with great pride, conviction and resolve have fought to “protect rights” both here and on foreign soil. To support a Constitutional Amendment to “Eliminate” rights is an insult to every American Soldier that has fought to protect our rights and freedoms.No on Prop8
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/Enxit Group, LLC