An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

How John McCain Could Still Win This Thing

I’ll preface this post by saying that the most conservative parts of the GOP base will not agree with it… nor will they see any reason McCain should care about the votes of people like me. I’m not a Republican, and I see that party as corrupted and twisted beyond all recognition these days. They’ve fully earned their time in the wilderness, and I know many (former) Republicans who won’t vote for them this year under any circumstances.

Furthermore, the tactics McCain and Palin have been employing are reprehensible. Taking advantage of bigotry or xenophobia is the tool of a schoolyard bully, not an aspiring class president.

Having said all that, the questions being raised about Barack Obama are not universally spawned of primal fear or ignorance. In the context of current economic conditions and rising populism, there are real concerns about what an Obama presidency might look like.

There have been a couple of points in American history when populism has combined with economic and/or social crises to alter the trajectory of our government. One is known to us today as The Progressive Era, another led to The New Deal… and the ramifications of both are with us today.

John McCain, however, has not proven himself able to articulate these questions clearly — and even if he could, it’s unlikely that he could attract anyone new beyond economists and libertarians. Why?

Because for many independents and moderates, his ticket is fatally-flawed, and the problem is Sarah Palin.

It’s not just that she’s inexperienced or uninformed about national issues; it’s that the very qualities that make her attractive to the extreme social conservatives appall much of the country. When one factors in John McCain’s age (as one must), the McCain-Palin ticket is an impossible conundrum. Even if moderates were inclined to vote for McCain, the very real risk that Palin could become president would stay their hands.

But what if Sarah Palin were no longer on the ticket?

The base would be very very angry, yes. But would that keep them from voting for McCain? In light of the heat that’s been generated against Obama recently, I don’t think it would.

They’re very clearly “rallied” already, and it’s not Sarah they’re focused on.

John McCain has roughly three weeks to turn his campaign around. If he can clearly articulate concerns about one-party government and the combination of over-extended federal involvement in over-reaching social policies, and find a more widely-appealing running-mate (preferably one with some gravitas this time), I think he’d have a real chance at the presidency.

He has to do both, and even then it would be a long shot… but otherwise, I think this thing is pretty much over.

  • CStanley
    I disagree not because I like Sarah Palin but because the very idea of dumping a VP candidate would sink the ticket even if it was not already sinking (see also: Eagleton, Thomas.)

    In a cycle where McCain gets the blame for everything he does, do you really think he'd survive dropping his VP candidate three weeks before the election, while everyone once again questions how erratic, unstable, and desperate he is?

    I mean it's one thing to speculate if a different VP candidate might have worked out better for him, but it makes no sense to second guess it now- he has to play this hand out.
  • Then he loses. I don't see any other way out of the box for him.
  • CStanley
    Oh, I don't really either (though I do wonder if the polls are overstating Obama's lead due to the weighting by party affiliation with so many new Democratic registrants.) Obama's ahead, and his supporters certainly have solidified their support, but I'm not totally convinced that the undecideds have settled on him. And a lot can happen in three weeks.
  • kritt11
    Well, in a sense McCain's own actions have contributed to his erratic image. He's obviously not comfortable campaigning with the tactics he's been using lately- maybe he feels they are beneath him, but is compromising his better instincts in order to win.
  • CStanley -- the undecideds are likely driven to at least some degree by the above-described Palin problem. Likewise, those same folks may be hesitating over Obama for the economy / divided government motives outlined in the post.

    And actually, I was hasty with my reply about whether Palin could be dropped. I think that if she were to recuse herself (say... because of Troopergate), it could perhaps be pulled off.
  • Rambie
    Agreed Polimom, I think if Palin withdrew from the campain it'd have a much better chance of working. Depending on who McCain's campaign picked to be the VP it may not anger the base all that much.
  • kritt11
    He could always go back to Tim Pawlenty.
  • StockBoySF
    It's really difficult to say whether McCain or Obama will win. I know polls favor Obama, but a lot can happen in three weeks. It's not clear to me if undecideds are looking for a reason to support one candidate or an excuse not to support a candidate.

    At this point I think Obama will win but I'm not convinced of that at all.

    I think if McCain were to pick Lieberman as his VP, then he would draw a lot of independents' support from Obama. But the gamble McCain is taking is with the GOP base. The only way McCain could win in that scenario is if he had the backing of Hannity, Limbaugh, etc.... These folks may hold their nose over the Lieberman pick just because they are so anti-Obama. Hannity, etc. would need to say that McCain's pick of Lieberman does show that McCain can reach across the aisle (to the GOP Lieberman is still a dem) and McCain is serious about bringing this country together... (not that I actually believe that line since Lieberman himself is a divisive figure, but that's what will need to be portrayed if McCain picks Lieberman and it is a good spin).

    I still think the race is leaning Obama....
  • JSpencer
    I'm guessing McCain has too much pride to ditch Palin, even though he has to regret making such an awful choice. That said, the race is probably closer than the numbers show, less due to party weighting than to the Bradley effect.
  • CStanley
    I'm still incredulous that any of you actually believe that McCain wouldn't be subjected to abject ridicule if he were to decide to reverse his decision to put Palin on the ticket.

    I thought about the angle that you mentioned, Polimom, that perhaps she could withdraw out of concerns that Troopergate is distracting from his message or something...but then too, it would produce nothing but backlash about how his judgement was so bad for having not vetted her to find out about this horrible scandal.

    Come on, folks, get with the program!
  • I agree with you, Christine.

    Look, I also think the choice of Palin ended up being a bad one. But McCain can't back out at this point. It'll look suspect, and accusations of bad judgment will fly all over.

    If you think Obama is going to win by a comfortable percentage now, consider what happens if she withdrawals. Forget comfortable. More like landslide.
  • "it would produce nothing but backlash about how his judgement was so bad for having not vetted her to find out about this horrible scandal"

    That's true -- though one could argue that his opposition is saying that anyway.

    Like I said: a longshot. But it really is the only scenario that I can envision that has any upside for him. The path he's on is terminal.
  • mlhradio
    While driving through the Texas Hill Country earlier today (yay, $2.63 gas!), listening to CNN political coverage on the radio, I had an idea:

    The John McCain Political Rally Bingo Card
  • GeorgeSorwell
    I have to agree with CStanley on this.

    McCain has already done a bunch of things that were designed to shake things up. They all came to be seen as stunts. And stunts that didn't really work out that well.

    Included in that is the selection of Palin herself.

    Palin is sort of strangely popular with the Republicans of the base I know. They don't like McCain. Even though they're afraid of Obama, they would abandon McCain in a heartbeat if Palin left the ticket.

    I agree with Polimom that Palin is representative of McCain's problems. But because of Palin, McCain has solidified the base, which he needed to do.

    What he now needs to do is articulate some positive, coherent message. The more positive, I think, the less coherent it would have to be. But he would have to get Palin to do the same thing.

    And it seems to me that if they lose, having had a positive message at her back would also help Palin in her own future ambitions. Palin is destroying her own prospects with the campaign she's running. It won't be possible for Palin to become the President of just the base in 2012, just as it isn't going to be possible for McCain this year.

    In my opinion--for what that's worth--the last thing McCain needs is yet another gimmick.
  • CStanley
    George- that's a good point, and I definitely agree that McCain needs to get a more positive message, and quickly.

    He also should figure out how to harness Palin's positives while controlling the negatives- the campaign needs to coordinate how they allow her to be herself but within limits so that she can continue motivating the base but without turning off the independents.

    One thing that occurred to me is that McCain seems to study the feedback he gets at his townhalls, and then use that as info about what messages are resonating. Now, that's not a bad tactic at all, but I think the problem is that the rallies give him feedback about what the most conservative voters want to hear rather than what the independents are wanting to hear. Polimom, maybe you should start attending and yelling out comments at their rallies!
  • CStanley
    GeorgeSorwell said:
    "I have to agree with CStanley on this."

    I just wanted to record that for posterity, and remind you that it's always good advice. ;->
  • "Polimom, maybe you should start attending and yelling out comments at their rallies! "

    LOL!!! They're not putting much time down my way. Texas isn't much of a "battleground".
  • CStanley
    True, but I hear that some Texans are registering in NV so maybe you could take a road trip.
  • CStanley
    It does look like McCain gets it to some extent, that the negativity has to be curtailed and he has to articulate more about the economy.

    Unfortunately though he gets no airtime, even when he says the single most sensible thing I've heard anyone suggest since this whole thing started:
    “Current rules mandate that investors must begin to sell off their IRAs and 401Ks when they reach age 70 and one half,” McCain said. “To spare investors from being forced to sell their stocks at just the time when the market is hurting the most, those rules should be suspended.”
  • I meant to write something about that, actually, but I keep getting derailed by life and stuff.

    Yes -- I think that's an excellent suggestion. But for it to help him, it needs to be part of an overarching narrative.
  • CStanley
    Absolutely agree about the narrative, and Politico has a piece up about McCain's attempt to do that now. Maybe too little too late, but I'm glad that he gets it at least.
  • timr
    current rumors coming out of CA rep party hq are saying that McCain is in serious discussion with high people in his campaign. The subject? Dumping Palin either before, during or just after the next debate(during the debate would really make it a game changer. I believe that it would make the race tight and too close to call, so what if it po's the wing nut red meat right, who else they gonna vote for?) and replacing her with Romney. I suspect that if these rumors are true then 1-she is not part of the discussion(in fact she seems to be out of the loop on almost everything already) 2-I suspect that she would find out by reading it in one of the numerous papers that she reads every day.

    From a cartoon found on line-could not link to it-
    "Sa-rah-gogue N: A leader with few qualifications who makes use of folksy phrases, popular prejudices, false claims and promises in order to gain power, you betcha"
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC