An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

McCain, Ayers and the Hail William and Mary Pass

ayers.jpgI’ve been loathe to tackle this subject in the past because it’s a rather daunting proposition to wrap your arms around, but the genie is now out of the bottle. (Or perhaps it would be better said that the pit bull is out of the doghouse?) Since Sarah Palin dared infer the specter of Bill Ayers and his connections to Barack Obama on the campaign trail, it seems that everyone will need to make their peace with this in one direction or the other. Reactions were swift and diverse, with our own Editor-in-Chief describing it as “a new low” for the McCain campaign. Conversely, a number of conservative voices, including my friend Ed Morrissey, have been belittling the MSM for playing down the connections between Obama and the admitted bomb thrower and early member of the Weather Underground. We are also told by anonymous McCain campaign sources that we will be treated to references regarding Tony Rezko as well. Apparently Reverend Wright will be off the table for stump speeches, with Big Mac leaving that to 527 groups and Right-wing bloggers with a wink and a nod.

For the benefit of those of us who may be a bit confused about these issues, I would ask Obama’s detractors to address a few basic questions. First let us start with the assumption that Barack Obama certainly knows William Ayers to one degree or another, having met on several occasions and worked simultaneously on the boards of two institutes. Is Barack Obama being accused of participating in illegal terrorist activities in concert with Ayers, or plotting to do so? If this is not the accusation, what precisely is the charge we are intended to consider? Is this essentially a question of judgment and character and the choices a candidate makes in their personal relationships? If so… fair enough. It’s a legitimate question for voters to consider when making their choice.

A similar set of questions could be offered up regarding Antoin “Tony” Rezko. He stands accused of a raft of illegal activities and corrupt business practices. Are we to understand that Obama is also being charged with committing some of these crimes? Or is this primarily another of those judgment questions?

If the former, then I think Obama’s accusers should be able to clearly spell out for us the charges against the candidate, including details of the crimes, times, dates and places. If the latter, then the situation is easier to grasp, but one wonders if this is a path that Team McCain actually wants to travel. Should the Obama campaign begin taking up our time in debates and campaign appearances talking about Rick Renzi? He stands accused of a host of federal corruption charges including money laundering and fraud and currently awaits trial. Establishing a “connection” between Renzi and McCain wouldn’t be difficult, as he served as Big Mac’s campaign co-chair in Arizona as recently as this year. The usual defense against this by McCain supporters is that Renzi hasn’t technically been convicted of anything yet. True enough. But if you are a pundit who has ever devoted any virtual ink to Dollar Bill Jefferson (as I have myself) then you’ve pretty much let the air out of that argument, since Jefferson and his freezer full of cold cash are still technically innocent until proven guilty.

If we are to assume, as these proponents of the Ayers As Campaign Issue meme seem to intend, that such associations are disqualifiers for the Oval Office, then may we assume that they will be calling for McCain’s resignation should he win the White House and Renzi be later found guilty? Surely having a convicted felon serve as your campaign co-chair is at least as solid of a “connection” as serving together on the board of the Annenberg Challenge or buying a house next door to some shady Chicago political fixer. None of this is to say that such questions should be forbidden or are somehow “off limits” in the political arena, particularly if it is solely a question of judgment. But a few more answers to the above questions would be helpful if you want voters who aren’t already clearly in the McCain camp to take these issues to heart.

  • whoosy
    Read it yourself and decide if Obama is misrepresenting his relationship with Ayers:http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2169
  • onleyone
    the Ayers mention is legitimate fodder for a debate on character. but i'm certain many on the Left would also love to have any justification for digging up the bones of the Keating 5 as they apply to The Maverick's campaign.

    but politics these days -- especially on the Right -- doesn't require facts. mud wins votes just as well, or better, even. to his credit, i think, at least post-primaries, Obama stuck largely to issues before the mud-slinging began. but with the Palin pick McCain more or less admitted his inability to win on substance, and now it's looking like a sh*tstorm on the horizon.
  • LindaKay
    Palin has a very close relationship with a very anti-American:

    Todd Palin, Longtime Former AIP Member - Alaskan Independence Party

    "Palin's husband Todd was a member of the AIP from October 1995 through July 2002, except for a few months in 2000. He is currently undeclared"

    third-party ("Alaska First -- Alaska Always") that wants Alaskans to get a vote on whether or not the state can secede from the U.S. But her husband was a long-time member, and at least two AIP officials recall her attending the 1994 convention, though she says she did not attend.

    http://tinyurl.com/3s3un2

    Todd Palin broke the law by not showing up to answer questions about the trooper investigation.

    McCain's relationship with G. Gordon Liddy a radio host and convicted Watergate burglar?

    Liddy has acknowledged preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in "if necessary"; plotting to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting with a "gangland figure" to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and plotting to kidnap "leftist guerillas" at the 1972 Republican National Convention -- a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder, firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary Clinton.

    Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain's campaigns
    since 1998, including $1,000 in February 2008.

    McCain has appeared on Liddy's radio show during the presidential campaign, including as recently as May.

    Listen to McCain on Liddy's show on 11/10/07 http://tinyurl.com/4k8f28

    Check out Liddy's many radio programs that strongly support McCain

    http://www.radioamerica.org/POD_ggl.htm

    in November McCain praised Liddy for his adherence “to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great,” Chapman reports.

    http://tinyurl.com/3nyx6o
  • GeorgeSorwell
    I'm kind of amazed.

    I understand that political professionals have inside information. But I can't believe this will work. I can't believe it's not self-defeating. I can't believe it won't boomerang.

    The hypocrisy and desperation of this are just too obvious. Will moderate undecideds really want to associate themselves with this? Won't even many McCain supporters find themselves embarrassed by this?

    Like the previous commenters, I'm well aware of the McCain's membership in the Keating Five and Palin's marriage to an Alaskan secessionist.

    The infamous commercial comparing Obama to Paris Hilton now seems like it's a million years old. And even though this strategy just went into effect today, it already seems like an artifact of a much distant time and place.

    Can such a thing actually work to the benefit of anyone?

    I accept that I know nothing of the way actual professionals operate politics.

    But I'm still amazed.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC