An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

McCain Readies Big Attack On Obama’s Character

A new Washington Post story makes it all but official, and in surprisingly candid language: the McCain campaign is getting ready to launch a fierce attack on Democratic Presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama’s character in order to “change the subject” from the economy:

Sen. John McCain and his Republican allies are readying a newly aggressive assault on Sen. Barack Obama’s character, believing that to win in November they must shift the conversation back to questions about the Democrat’s judgment, honesty and personal associations, several top Republicans said.

With just a month to go until Election Day, McCain’s team has decided that its emphasis on the senator’s biography as a war hero, experienced lawmaker and straight-talking maverick is insufficient to close a growing gap with Obama. The Arizonan’s campaign is also eager to move the conversation away from the economy, an issue that strongly favors Obama and has helped him to a lead in many recent polls.

“We’re going to get a little tougher,” a senior Republican operative said, indicating that a fresh batch of television ads is coming. “We’ve got to question this guy’s associations. Very soon. There’s no question that we have to change the subject here,” said the operative, who was not authorized to discuss strategy and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The McCain campaign knows it could run into some problems, but feels it is worth the risk:

Being so aggressive has risks for McCain if it angers swing voters, who often say they are looking for candidates who offer a positive message about what they will do. That could be especially true this year, when frustration with Washington politics is acute and a desire for specifics on how to fix the economy and fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is strong.

Robert Gibbs, a top Obama adviser, dismissed the new McCain strategy. “This isn’t 1988,” he said. “I don’t think the country is going to be distracted by the trivial.” He added that Obama will continue to focus on the economy, saying that Americans will remain concerned about the country’s economic troubles even as the Wall Street crisis eases somewhat.

But in general, a highly-negative campaign works — and it did for McCain right after the conventions. Expect the change to come soon:

McCain hinted Thursday that a change is imminent, perhaps as soon as next week’s debate. Asked at a Colorado town hall, “When are you going to take the gloves off?” the candidate grinned and replied, “How about Tuesday night?”

But from the McCain campaign’s perspective, they also have grounds to argue that they’ve been provoked:

McCain advisers said the new approach is in part a reaction to Obama, whose rhetoric on the stump and in commercials has also become far harsher and more aggressive.

They noted that Obama has run television commercials for months linking McCain to lobbyists and hinting at a lack of personal ethics — an allegation that particularly rankles McCain, aides said.

In essence, the rest of the campaign will be an extension of McCain’s highly aggressive post-convention campaign that was derailed by the sudden spate of headline-grabbing economic news:

Before the bailout crisis, aides said, McCain was succeeding in focusing attention on Obama’s record and character. Now, they say, he must return to those subjects.

“We are looking for a very aggressive last 30 days,” said Greg Strimple, one of McCain’s top advisers. “We are looking forward to turning a page on this financial crisis and getting back to discussing Mr. Obama’s aggressively liberal record and how he will be too risky for Americans.”

So it’s time to “turn a page” on the financial crisis.

Will voters agree that the issue has been dealt with and that the focus of America’s debate should now be over Obama as The Dangerous One?

  • D. E.Rodriguez
    "So it’s time to “turn a page” on the financial crisis."

    Yes, I am sure the desperate McCain campaign is getting ready to turn every one of the 300-plus pages of sleaze and smears in Corsi's "Obamanation" to use against Obama. Will it work? It depends on whether Americans themselves are finally ready to turn the page on the swiftboating of their candidates and on character assassination.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    From the Washington Post article:

    Yesterday in Pueblo, Colo., McCain made clear that he intends to press Obama on a variety of familiar GOP themes during the debate, as he accused the Democrat once again of getting ready to raise taxes and increase government spending.


    I guess this is as opposed to Republicans, who cut taxes while increasing government spending.

    Hey, grandkids--thanks for buying me that war in Iraq!!
  • JSpencer
    So... this is the rationale for McCain not having been able to be effective? He hasn't been negative enough? The bulk of his ads to date contain a higher proportion of deception and attack, as compared to Obama, and it hasn't helped him. Isn't McCain afraid this kind of desperation will backfire on him? It may thrill the base, but independents will likely feel insulted.
  • rickCA
    Question for McCain for Tuesday's debate . . . it's common knowledge the Republicans know how to turn on the nasty campaign machine and dirty tricks when down in the polls. Everyone knows these players well . . . Lee Atwater, Karl Rove, and now Steve Schmidt.

    America right now is depressed, demoralized, and hurting big time. The last thing we want to see for the next four weeks are tens of millions of dollars spent on nasty commercials, polling site tricks, Swift Boat antics, etc.

    Would you, Mr. McCain, refrain from this type of campaigning from this point forward? You are the one that decides to go or not go down this path. And, please, don't justify doing it by claiming you would only be telling the truth or dirty little facts. America has heard enough bad news to last our lifetimes.

    Just tell us what YOU stand for and leave the negative statements behind. We're smart enough to sort through the facts and our own opinions.

    I hope both parties read this. Let's get the message to both candidates. Maybe someone will ask this question on Tuesday?
  • jkarczek
    The fact of the matter is that this was the predicatable turn. The only way this campaign wouldn't have turned overwhelmingly negative on both sides was if one candidate had opened up an insurmountable lead by now. Then the leading campaign would've likely taken "the high road" in an effort to ease the transition period and hopefully get its policy priorities through Congress more easily.

    What's also predictable is that unless McCain's ads go completely insane, for example trying to imply Obama is a Muslim Manchurian Candidate, his all negative counterattack WILL succeed in reversing at least a good bit of Obama's momentum. People want to believe of themselves that negative campaigning doesn't work with them, that they are disgusted by it, but the fact of the matter is that it almost ALWAYS works.

    So Obama better not trivialize this, he better prepare, he better have good, incisive answers on taxes, corruption, Rev. Wright and all the rest, because if he's not completely believable the polls will reverse on him just like they did for McCain. People have already forgotten that just a couple weeks ago Obama's campaign and the Democrats in general were in a state of apoplexy during the Palin tidalwave.
  • pacatrue
    Seems one of the better counter-attacks would be to quote a McCain advisor saying they don't want to focus on the economy anymore at the very time when the economy continues going into free-fall.

    But I'm a pessimist. I'm sure the negative attacks will have some effect.
  • I dunno, jkarczek. You talk about the campaign turning "overwhelmingly negative on both sides", but it's really just been McCain who has gone almost 100% negative in the last few weeks. It's all he's got left. Obama still regularly stumps about his policy proposals and tends to leave voters with a good taste in their mouths. To an extent, he's got to avoid racist stereotypes of the "angry black man", which limits how negative he can get.

    Until I see reason to do otherwise, I completely trust Obama's handling of whatever comes his way. Not so much for all of his surrogates and handlers, but Obama managed to successfully navigate the stormy waters of the post-Palin nomination by staying out of the way and letting her implode on her own. After watching his steady hand at the till through months and months of a vicious primary battle, this man knows how to fend off negative attacks. If he can fend off the Clinton machine, McCain is a piece of cake.
  • rickCA
    The economy is only going to get worse in the next month so the "elephant in the room" isn't going away. And we should get another gloomy employment report right before November 4 which should all but stamp McCain and Palin's ticket home . . . hopefully Obama gets to double digits before then and then the landslide will form and keep the Reds from caring about even voting.

    Any bets on what Tine Fey's skit will be about tonight? Lots of winks, I'm sure. My money is on Fey sitting on McCain's lap like a ventriloquist with him saying . . .
    Isn't she cute?" Then Fey . . . "Aren't I cute?"
  • StockBoySF
    jkarczek: "What's also predictable is that unless McCain's ads go completely insane, for example trying to imply Obama is a Muslim Manchurian Candidate, his all negative counterattack WILL succeed in reversing at least a good bit of Obama's momentum."

    Just to add to what you said.... Unfortunately many people DO feel that Obama is a Muslim Manchurian Candidate (you forgot terrorist). McCain doesn't have to put it all together.... these people hear "1" then "2" and when they put them together they come up with "3"....
  • This is nothing new. The Mccain campaign has been nothing but
    negative since day one.
    What they do not understand is the American voters are tired
    of their lies, distortions and attacks. And, we are intelligent enough
    to see through all their swiftboating.
    Mccain, you are not a man I respect or trust. You, most certainly,
    are not capable or qualified to lead our country.
  • jkarczek
    davigoli: Well, I could have been clearer. I think Obama WILL go negative in response to McCain. Based on what I've read, at this point the Obama ad mix is something like evenly divided between promoting his agenda and negative attacks on his opponent. I don't expect that to continue when McCain unleashes his new, improved offensive, now with 100% negativity. Unless Obama has some compelling, easy for "regular folks" to understand counterpoints that are largely impervious to being spun against him, the McCain campaign will draw nearer in the polls. Obama will then do what every campaign does when a race tightens in the waning days, he will match if not exceed the negativity of the opponent.

    SBSF: That's true, but I think that there would be a major outcry if it were used explicitly by the McCain campaign. Even if an independent group used it in a Swift Boat style attack, I think it would probably result in a net benefit for Obama because I don't think this absurd "Agent of Islam" belief is very widely held, especially amongst the independents and undecideds that are all important right now. It would feed into the meme that McCain is petty and mean spirited, willing to do anything to win. No, I expect McCain's negative ads will hammer Obama's positions on issues that are less sensational and easier to, at least superficially, document.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC