An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Bailout Bill & Playing The Blame Game

01aaaForeclosure.jpg

It comes as no surprise that there was a steady drumbeat of partisan politics in the drafting of the $700 billion financial bailout plan that was defeated this afternoon largely because of defiant House Republicans. But both parties turned up the vitriol in the wake of the stunning no-confidence vote in President Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, and global markets dutifully reacted. As one leading economic light wrote, “Yes, Virginia, this is a crash.”

As the following summary of the plan that lost by a 228-205 vote shows, the Democratic leadership more or less prevailed before vote, while Bush and Paulson didn’t do so hot. Oh, and John McCain had zip to do with the outcome, although he was quick to pin the blame on Barack Obama. Pray tell? Will McCain “suspend” his campaign again?

The summary:


*
A new congressional panel would have oversight power and the Treasury secretary would report regularly to lawmakers as part of a multi-level oversight apparatus.

* If the Treasury takes a stake in a company, the top five executives would be subject to compensation limits.

*
Executives hired after a financial company offloads more than $300 million in assets via auction to the government will not be eligible for “golden parachutes.”

*
The Federal Reserve would begin paying interest on bank reserves on October 1, giving it another tool for easing credit strains.

*
A study would be undertaken to determine the impact of the mark-to-market accounting standards that critics blame for a downward spiral in the valuation of assets on corporate balance sheets.

* The federal government may stall foreclosure proceedings on home loans purchased under the plan.

* Along with the plan to buy securities outright, the Treasury will develop an alternative insurance program that would underwrite troubled loans and be paid for by participating companies.

*
If the government has taken losses five years into the program, the Treasury will draft a plan to tax the companies that took part to recoup taxpayer losses.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi came in for extra helpings of Republican scorn after the vote for speaking the truth about the staggering $700 billion price tag beforehand:

“It is a number that is staggering, but tells us only the costs of the Bush Administration’s failed economic policies — policies built on budgetary recklessness, on an anything goes mentality, with no regulation, no supervision, and no discipline in the system.”

An analysis by Swing State Project showed that among 38 incumbent congressmen in races rated as “toss up” or “lean,” just eight voted for the bailout as opposed to 30 against. The vote among congressfolks who didn’t have as much to worry about was nearly even: 197 for and 198 against.

Meanwhile, there has been a lot of blame gaming over the roots of the financial meltdown, but none as insidious than the canard that minorities are responsible for the whole mess because they bought houses on which they couldn’t keep up the payments.

The bogeymen are those damned libruls and their Community Reinvestment Act, which required banks to lend to low-income borrowers. Among the problems with blaming the CRA is that subprime loans weren’t required and many more subprime loans were written during the irrational exuberance of the housing bubble.

The truth is much less convenient: While people of all colors who had no business buying houses are a factor, mortgage companies and banks saw subprime loans as “free money.”

When the economy started tanking, the bubble burst and borrowers started defaulting at a record pace, many of these lenders didn’t have the legs to ride out the storm despite an “anything goes” deregulatory environment that had been gift wrapped for them by congressional Democrats and Republicans alike.

Oh, and even though it played well at the time in the hustings, letting Lehman Brothers fail doesn’t look like it was such a hot idea anymore.

No matter the eventual fate of the bailout bill, and no one has a clue as to whether it will work when it eventually clears Congress — and it will eventually clear Congress — the Democrats will be blamed for any perceived shortcomings although they had the sense to realize that no bill would pass without bipartisan support and have taken a goodly number of their partisan must-haves off the table while leaving some of the Republicans’ on.

  • I'm waiting for the trolls...

    3...2...1...
  • sorry. I must be early. Shaun, I agree with most of your post. Maybe all of it. I dislike the "blame game" meme, which I have seen both sides use to stifle dissent. It's not a "blame game" to assess accountability and responsibility. It is essential to our ability to learn from past mistakes. The opposite of this "blame game" is to say "mistakes were made" and let's just move on (ignoring any lessons to be learned or corrective action to be taken to prevent future recurrences). Indeed, a big part of the problem is that the GOP dismantled some of the protections enacted after the Great Depression.
  • DLS
    Glass-Steagall was repealed with Democratic encouragement and Robert Rubin's as well as President Bill Clinton's approval in the 1990s. Just in case some have chosen conveniently to forget things that matter.

    It's great that the bill failed. Now both sides can start to really get to work, hopefully free of gimmicks and earmarks or anything else that doesn't matter. Not that that is the best we can hope for. Best of all would be no government interference whatsoever with the now-overdue failures that should be permitted to occur.
  • JSpencer
    GreenDreams : "It's not a "blame game" to assess accountability and responsibility. It is essential to our ability to learn from past mistakes."

    God I love it when common sense makes an appearance. Amen brother!
  • superdestroyer
    If is laughable that Shaun expects two lame duck politicians President Bush and Sec. Paulson but no leadership from Pelosi, Reid, or especially Senator Obama.

    The Democrats have been in charge of Congress for almost two years. How many hearings were held on the coming credit crunch. How many times have Democrats introduced legislation to change things in the last two years.

    If Shaun was not such a partisan he would rightly be ripping into Speaker Pelosi. She has been as incompetent and lacking as Speaker Hastert was. Here it is at the end of September and the Congress rush through continuing resolutions to make up for hard work on the budget. Speaker Pelosi sent a bill to the floor while not knowing if she had the votes and when supposedly wanting it to be Bipartisan, gave the Republicans the back of her hand instead of asking for help.

    If Speaker Pelosi is the shape of things to come with the Democrats in charge of everything, I wonder how Shaun will find ways to blame Republicans for the total lack of leadership on the part of Democrats.

    Also,I noticed Shaun went out of his way to not stated that 95 Democrats Congressmen had the sense to not vote for a junked up piece of legislation. If Congress wants to do something have hearings, debates, and fact gathering before proposing 750 billion in additional debt.
  • JSpencer
    IGreenDreams : "Indeed, a big part of the problem is that the GOP dismantled some of the protections enacted after the Great Depression."

    Exactly. So much for learning from history eh? Good grief...
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC