An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Amid Sagging Polls, McCain Campaign Readies New Two-Part Obama Attack

In the light of a debate in which some feel Republican Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain came out ahead but didn’t demolish opponent Democratic Sen. Barack Obama, and sagging numbers in the polls, McCain’s campaign is now reportedly-readying a two-pronged attack against Obama after a week in which national economic news dominated the stage:

“The first lesson of this campaign, going back to 2007, is not to be panicky or reactive to poll numbers,” said McCain senior adviser Steve Schmidt. “A few weeks back, we had a clear lead, albeit a narrow one, and there were a lot of people on the Democratic side haranguing the Obama campaign in the sense of panic. We always understood not only would that lead dissipate but bounce back the other way and then bounce back again.”

Schmidt is correct. There is a tendency for new and old media to get sucked into the prevailing wisdom, which can vanish as abruptly as Washington Mutual when a new conventional wisdom surfaces. One fact is certain: the Obama campaign is proving to be a highly reactive campaign mechanism that lets the national political debate be set by McCain. Last week’s economic news took political debate setting out of the hands of both Obama and McCain. Tracking polls (which don’t yet show the full impact of the debate) now show Obama ahead.

But, if a bailout agreement passes, the economic story will still be huge but not in red alert national crisis mode. Will the Obama campaign return to reacting to McCain ads or delaying response until McCain charges dominate the news and campaign ad cycles?

For McCain, the danger is that previously undecided voters will become comfortable that Obama is ready to be president. The longer Obama can hold even a small lead, the more difficult it will be for McCain to reverse it, absent something unexpected happening. McCain’s best hope, strategists said, is for the crisis atmosphere around Wall Street and the credit markets to lessen, allowing the campaign debate to focus on other questions as much as the economy. The agreement reached early this morning on Capitol Hill about a Wall Street relief package may help with that.

The McCain campaign benefits when the race becomes about Obama, versus specific issues. If it can get the focus back on personality, Obama generally loses since his campaign will never confused with the old Bill Clinton “War Room” that responded immediately and went on the offensive ASAP when Clinton defeated the first George Bush.

Schmidt said the campaign will press two arguments as forcefully as possible in the coming days. One is that Obama is not ready to be commander in chief and that, in a time of two wars, “his policies will make the world more dangerous and America less secure.” Second, he said, McCain will argue that, in a time of economic crisis, Obama will raise taxes and spending and “will make our economy worse.”

Can this succeed? Yes on two fronts:

1. Republicans have traditionally rallied their party base and picked up some independents by arguing Democrats are tax and spend. The bottom line argument here is that Obama would be the WRONG KIND of change. Democrats generally loose this argument due to ignoring the charge or by offering bland responses to it, mistakenly assuming that the charge won’t have “legs.” (To assume makes an “ass” of “u” and “me”..)

2. Even though poll numbers show Obama did well among independents during the debate, various news stories underscored how some still feel uneasy about him and unsure about him. This is written from Connecticut where I’m on a trip. During the past few days two people who might be swing voters told me they want to vote Republican but don’t yet trust Obama. Obama assured many independents in the debate but he has not closed the sale and has not connected in personal terms the way winning debaters JFK and Ronald Reagan did.

The McCain campaign’s argument about Obama’s policies and experience could be undercut by the news media and Democrats if the question is posed forcefully about whether GOP Vice Presidential candidate Gov. Sarah Palin is qualified to become commander in chief if something happens to McCain. Republican partisans will answer “of course!” but this might not play well with swing voters — if Palin doesn’t provide yet another McCain campaign surprise and hit a homerun during her debate with Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Sen. Joe Biden this week. Right now the conventional wisdom is that she won’t do well — NOT a good sign for the Obama campaign, if the shelf-life of conventional wisdoms is accuracy recalled…

Obama signaled yesterday that his focus will be on painting McCain as out of touch on the economy. Appearing at a rally in Greensboro, N.C., Obama ripped into his rival’s remarks about the economy during the debate — but more for what McCain didn’t say.

The bottom line still remains: in most cases when the McCain campaign has gotten aggressive and gone negative its poll numbers go up — and the Obama campaign stumbles until it responds. If the bailout passes and the economic crisis is not the number one news story of the day, the McCain campaign could well veer the campaign back into a mode of its own choosing — and liking.

UPDATE II:
There’s a lot of weblog reaction, but here’s one from skippy, who write in lower case and who invented the word “blogotopia”:

here at skippy international, we are of the opinion that, tho it seemed like a tie (ie, no tko’s on either side), the fact that obama looked far more presidential than people who listened to mcmuffin’s “he’s not ready” ads expected, plus the fact that mcmuffin is supposedly the “expert” on foreign policy and should have knocked it out of the park but didn’t, gives obama the winning touchdown.

if we may mix sports metaphors.

  • GeorgeSorwell
    By suspending his campaign to deal with credit crisis, then not dealing with it, didn't McCain only make his problems worse?
  • JSpencer
    John McCain has shown he has an advantage over Obama insofar as willingness to heavily compromise the means for the ends ( and I think I'm being generous there). Ironically, he does seem to have a "hope" message, which is that the economy will somehow stop being the number one concern between now and November. Good luck with that John. Last week I received a copy of a video in the mail, "Obsession", which I understand a 501 group, the Clarion Fund, is flooding the swing states with. It is essentially a propaganda tool trying to exploit fears of Islamic extremism. Apparently there is another such video set to be released in a few weeks. Perhaps one October surprise possibility will be (depending on her debate performance) dropping Palin and presenting a new demagogue for the base to get reanimated over. Frankly, nothing will surprise me. The neo-right may not be able to govern their way out of the paper bag, but they still know how to campaign... even if it is on the sociopathic side. Country first anyone?
  • Silhouette
    Ironic that the very two points that McCain will argue, in classic orwellian GOP "MInistry Of Truth" fashion, are the very two points that will demolish the USA if McCain should win. The exact opposite scenario.

    The world is pissed off at us. Even our allies are begrudgingly with us more from economic ties than from friendly ones. China could change that in a bidding war..

    McCain is a myopic cowboy hellbent on continuing an illegal war, the very war that is pissing off the world. Guess who is in power now? Dubya is also a myopic cowboy hellbent on continuing an illegal war, the very war that is pissing off the world.

    Foreign investors, our very economic lifeblood at this point, will see a move towards McCain as synonymous with a move towards the same type of instability that Bush propogates. A move towards Obama AND ESPECIALLY IF THE CLINTONS ARE ANNOUNCED AS PART OF HIS TEAM would be seen by the world as a bold, smart and diplomatic move and the Clinton resume' alone would boost investor confidence in our nation's ability to recover.

    The whole world is standing by waiting to see how we will roll our dice. If we seem hellbent on the same self-destructive path that Bush/McCain will insure, they will leave us to rot. If we show intelligence and foresight, like any investors looking over the portfolio of a business, they will go with that 'upper management" as it is a safer bet.

    By the way...the issue of the economy is issue #1 and will continue to be throughout the election. National security is it's secondary twin. If Obama is smart enough to show that our National Security rests not on the muscles of a daring and myopic cowboy, but on the calm and diplomatic shoulders of his own cabinet, then McCain will continue to lose ground.

    In other words, if Obama continues to keep our national security married tightly to the economy, then McCain has no talking points. The minute he lets our national security become cleaved from the economic debacle our vulnerability rises from, Obama will begin to lose ground.

    Word to the wise...
  • superdestroyer
    McCain cannot talk about fiscal sanity, budget cuts, or restraint because the idiots in the Bush Administration and advisors like Karl Rove were convinced that the Repulbicans could be the second big government, big spending party.

    Now President Bush has five or more trillion dollars to the national debt and has the lowest approval rating possible.
  • crosspit
    Depressing, but probably correct. I've been uneasy with all the blog posting about Palin is a joke, etc. So far she's performed poorly, but if she even does a mediocre job at the debate the McCain heads will just keep trumpeting black is white until the press repeats their talkingpoints enough to make an impact. McCain has shown he has no problem with outright lying and smears, so another 4 weeks allows him plenty of time to correct the upswing for Obama. And, of course, they could use a Palin daughter wedding to distract the press for a week or longer.... But I'm not a politico so I hope my worries are crap.
  • Jim_Satterfield

    During the past few days two people who might be swing voters told me they want to vote Republican but don’t yet trust Obama.


    Huh?
  • Silhouette
    A bit more about the Clinton/Obama situation. Whatever it takes, I am beggin in the cyber equivalent of being on my knees...the two camps need to reconcile and comp up with a compromise. We know Hillary wanted the Oval Office and is gearing up to come back in four years. We know that her reticence to fully back Obama is from wanting him to look weak enough to challenge in four years.

    OK, we get it. (You thought you'd never hear me admonishing the Clintons eh?..lol)

    Why not have Obama sign a contract in blood with the Clintons that he will not run again in 2012? That he will turn that race over to Hillary? It's something for Barack Obama himself to mull over. Being president is hell on earth. ESPECIALLY this next four years. He will have made history, fulfilled the seat of President in his vigor and before he is drained and scheduled for disemboweling by the bitter and vindictive GOP (like they did to Bill with the Lewinsky setup), Obama can turn the reins over to a fresh and feisty Hillary who then will also go on to make history with Obama high in her cabinet? Then Hillary can turn the race back over to a fresh and still young Obama who will sweep in with an easy win, fresh from the rest, seasoned and ready to sweep up the last bits of dust from a nearly-ruined America..

    A split-shift presidency? The next twelve years to reconstruct? We could do it and it would be the very best medicine this nation could take at this juncture. It's time to put grappling, petty egos and personal agendas aside and talk sanity, logic and compromise. Obama needs the Clintons. We all need the Clintons' economic expertise and resume' to entice the world to trust us again.

    Admitting we need them isn't that hard. You may hate an expert carpenter because he rubs you the wrong way; but when it's time to put in the foundation for the new World Trade Center, you'd better hire him and put your egos on the back porch.

    Hey?

    OK, now I'm tugging your pantlegs....guys?
  • timr
    McCain won the debate? What you been smokin? MOST of the punditocracy(the majority, vast majority in fact) say that Obama won. All he had to show was that he could stand up to McCains "expertise" on national security and foreign affairs. He did. Not only that but McCains body language has been commented on extensively. He was crouched behind his mic. He never looked at Obama, he clenched his jaw and ground his teeth. He was very contemptuous towards Obama. On his implusive gamble before the debate. He is a risk taker, someone who will go with his gut and risk everything on a wild try to go for the home run. He admitted as much in his(ghost written) books.He said" I make lots of mistakes doing this sort of thing, then I have to really scramble to get out of my mistake".(Think about this. Do you really want McCain to have his finger on the trigger of nuclear war?, You want someone in charge who STILL wants to continue the disastrous bush tax cuts? We are right now just printing money to cover our debts with nothing of value to back all that extra money,who wants to make Phil(father of deregulation) Gramm his SecTreas? Do you really want a wild gambling risk taker in charge? Really?) He made his big gamble when he said to Obama, this is to important, I am not going to the debate because this is more important. IOW, trying to force Obama and the debate people to go along with him-his secondary reason(some believe) was to try and canx the VP debate by reskd the first debate on the VP nite and then redoing the VP debate sometime(like december maybe)-However Obama trumped his card by saying "I'm going," it only takes a few hours by plane, and anyway we are not involved in this debate here in DC. After all, it was McCain, not bush who wanted the show meeting where he could play st john to the rescue. Unfortunately for him, most people got the impression that instead of saving the agreement, he was the reason it collapsed. McCain gambled everything on his implusive idea. He lost. Even some repigs went on TV and said that McCain should stay far far away from DC. BTW, doesn't McCain know about cell phones, text messaging and E-mails? He could have kept in touch no matter where he was. Instead he looked like a glory hound who was thinking more about his campaign than he was about the country. Even Faux News was saying the same thing. Obama won the debate according to the snap polls and according to the polls out today.
  • historychaser
    AND ESPECIALLY IF THE CLINTONS ARE ANNOUNCED AS PART OF HIS TEAM

    The trouble with this pipe dream is that Obama did not pick Hilliary. Thus demonstrating very poor judgement. Every time I see Bill Clinton on TV he damns Obama with faint praise.

    Obama had his supporters as keyed up as kids the night before Christmas, then gave them socks (Biden). No matter how fancy you wrap them, socks are still socks.

    http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com
  • SoCalGuy
    Thank you - I was just going to post the same question.
  • SoCalGuy
    Hmm.... that was supposed to thread as a reply to Jim_Satterfield's comment, but for some reason that didn't work.
  • StockBoySF
    GeorgeSorwell: "By suspending his campaign to deal with credit crisis, then not dealing with it, didn't McCain only make his problems worse?"

    Yeah... I agree with you.

    Furthermore, if McCain really had suspended his campaign until the crisis was over (and we were "winning", as evidenced by a rebounding economy) then McCain really would have helped things along and we would be better off. :)
  • StockBoySF
    Jim and SoCalGuy... I saw that and had the same question. I think there's a typo in that.... I think those particular swing voters "DO NOT want to vote Republican but don't yet trust Obama."
  • Kathryn
    Ok Silhouette, you are making some interesting points that I must consider. Hillary in 2012? I would be Ok with it if she divorced Bill. BUT, aren't you kind of discounting the real good she could do at the helm of the Senate? I have to say, I am far more impressed with the work she has done there then the work she did running her campaign. This is in no way a slam. Different people have different skill sets and I think it belittles her to say that she can only achieve something real if she becomes President. Especially since the Presidency would never, ever, be hers alone unless she divorced Bill. The Senate seat from New York is hers. (Perhaps she is a better Senator than she was Presidential Candidate because Bill didn't interfere.)
    Regardless, the Democrats need someone smart who isn't afraid to give a Democratic President the facts, yet can be depended on not to stab the President in the back. Hillary as Senate Majority Leader could fill that role very well (although I'm not quite sure about her not being a back stabber, I'd feel better if she dumped Bill.)
  • JSpencer
    Any thoughts on Hillary getting a cabinet appointment? I guess that depends on whether or not there is one she is interested in. I agree though, she can do a lot in the Senate... and there is of course 2012. One election at a time though. ;-)
  • JLM
    Well I guess I am glad that McCain will actually win the election.
  • JLM
    Well as for me --- "You're absolutely right, John!"

    Gee, I do think that McCain did "win" the debate but who really cares.
  • JLM
    Really? You're not quite sure about Hillary being a back stabber?

    Where the hell have you been for the last 20 years? She's worn out a complete set of those door to door knife salesman knives. The really good ones with the bone handles. LOL

    Really?
  • JLM
    Well, I don't think John will appoint her, do you? Hahahahahha!

    OK, I know only I think that that was funny. Sorry.
  • DonO
    AMERICA REALLY NEEDS AND WANTS A NEW AND TRUE HERO. NOT A "MESSIAH". This race for the top chair is going to the one that can either be honest or deceitful in swaying the voters. So far we have a tie between the two major contenders. Mc Cain refuses to take the gloves off and set the record straight about the cause of the current financial "bull pie" tied to Clinton, previous and current democrats. Obama always has preconditions of topics allowed for any interview including those who interview his wife. Makes me wonder if there was such an agreement for the debate since he originally declined McCain's offer to debate in the first place. This is such a quagmire I sometimes think if McCain is out of "the ring" and no longer willing to fight he should be the "Gentleman" and step aside for someone else to deliver the blow.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/Enxit Group, LLC