An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Bailout Stalled: Cynicism Understandable, But Conservative Anger is Real

The skepticism of fellow The Moderate Voice blogger Polimom is understandable. All the pieces are in place for John McCain to, sometime tomorrow, be portrayed as the hero who brokered a resolution to the financial crisis acceptable to The White House, Congressional Democrats, and recalcitrant conservative Congressional Republicans. It seems so pat, so obvious, and it just might be true.

But I don’t think so.

Conservative anger at the proposed White House bailout plan is enormous.

Yesterday, former Arkansas governor and Republican presidential contender Mike Huckabee wrote to his supporters. Here’s some of what he wrote:

Frankly, I’m disappointed and disgusted with my own Republican party as I watch them attempt to strong-arm a bailout of some of America’s biggest corporations by asking the taxpayers to suck up the staggering results of the hubris, greed, and arrogance of those who sought to make a quick buck by throwing the dice. They lost, but want the rest of us to cover their bets so they won’t be effected in their lavish lifestyles as they figure out how to spend their tens of millions and in some cases, hundreds of millions in bonuses and compensation which was their reward for not only sinking their companies, but basically doing the same to the entire American economy.

It’s especially disconcerting to see the very people who pilloried me during the Presidential campaign for being a “populist” and not “understanding Wall Street” to now line up like thirsty dogs at the Washington, D. C. water dish, otherwise known as Congress, and plead for help. I thought these guys were the smartest people in America! I thought that taxpayers like you and I were similar to the people at the U. N. who have no translator speaking into their headset – that we just needed to trust those that I called the power bunch in the “Wall Street to Washington axis of power.”

The idea of a government bailout in which we’d entrust $700 billion to one man without Congressional oversight or accountability is absurd. My party or not, that is insanity and I believe unconstitutional.

Will there be far-reaching consequences without some intervention? Probably, but we honestly don’t know since we’ve really never seen this level of greed and stupidity all rolled into one massive move. But may I suggest that letting “Uncle Sugar” step in and bail out the billionaires who made the mess will be far worse and will start a long line of companies and individuals who will demand the same of the government—which last time I checked means that they will be demanding it out of YOU and ME. This is not money that Congress is risking from THEIR pockets or future, but ours. Many if not most of us have already experienced lost value on our homes, retirement accounts, and pensions. Now they’d like for us to assume some further risks so they won’t have to.

What happened to the “free market” idea? Is that only our view when we WIN and when we LOSE, we ask the government to come in and take away the pain?

If you are a small business owner, is this the way it works at your place? When you have a bad month, a bad year, or face having to close, can you go up to Congress and get them to write YOU a fat check to take away your risk?

Huckabee went on to outline his own proposal and then wrote:

Attempts by Democrats and Republicans to blame each other is nonsense. They are both guilty and ought to own up and admit it. They all lived off big campaign contributions and the swill of the lobbyists who strong armed them into permission to steal. Enough of blame. Fix it!

This would be a start. If we don’t hold these guys responsible, we are all finished.

He then asked for contributions to his HuckPAC in order, he said, to support candidates who agreed with him in his opposition to the Republican president’s plan for fixing the financial markets.

Apparently, in his full-throated anger, Huckabee isn’t speaking just for himself. He sent out a follow-up email today:

We’ve received [an] overwhelming response to my last email. The comments my email generated were loud and clear: we have had enough of Washington’s knee-jerk big government and we want and demand a return to the conservatism our Party has championed for decades.

We also had over 500 contributors more than 300 of whom were first time supporters of Huck PAC.

The Bush-Paulson-Bernanke proposal has put the fraying seams of the Republican coalition, the schism between Wall Street and Wal-Mart Republicans, on full display. The anger middle income conservatives, as demonstrated by the emails from Huckabee, a guy not running for anything this year, and the rapid response to them, especially from first-time contributors, tells me that the impasse in Congress is no fake.

The anger is real. Any resolution will entail genuine compromise. Whether John McCain can play a role in bringing that about is anybody’s guess. Many Republicans aren’t in a compromising mood.

[Here's a link to my personal blog.]

  • JSpencer
    Why the republicans expect to have any credibility at this juncture is a mystery to me, particularly when it comes to concerns about the middle class. Are they turning over a new leaf? They must think the American people are fools.
  • elrod
    Here's the problem. The anger is real from conservatives. But the solutions are non-existent.

    I watched Senator Shelby rail against the Paulson plan (without mentioning that the Dodd-Frank bill is quite a bit different on issues that anger Shelby) and never once offered a counter-proposal.
  • Don Quijote
    I am as far from a conservative as anyone can get, and I don't want to see these people being bailed out. If these institutions must be bailed out, nationalize them, wipe out the stock holders, sue the executives so that by the time they get out of court, they have nothing but the shirts on their backs.

    If the shoe was on the other foot, they would send me to the poor house with giving it a second thought.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Republicans are never in a compromising mood.

    Think about it.
  • Jim_Satterfield
    George beat me to it. Compromise has been a dirty word in the Republican lexicon for years now.
  • kritt11
    That is the danger of electing ideologues--- -their policies don't work in the real world-- their conservative "principles" are all they can pretend to stand for. If they vote for this, even that pretense will be taken away from them.

    Given a real crisis they will stand on principle all the way into the abyss!
  • Marlowecan
    Last night Barney Frank was saying the Democrats had reached an agreement . . . with the Democrats . . . and he had the votes among the Democrats to pass it.

    I wondered at the time where the GOP was in all of that . . . and whether Frank was saying that to undercut McCain. So we see now that Frank does not have the votes.

    Mark and Elrod are right . . . there is a lot of anger among Republicans . . . directed at other Republicans.

    That said . . . I don't know how much McCain can do about it . . . as there is a lot of anger at him too.

    This is a perfect example of why the United States needs a strong executive figure . . . somebody like a President or something . . . who can step in and take charge in a time of crisis, and rally the nation.

    It is unfortunate that there is no such creature. . . .
  • kritt11
    I know the country is going to H in a handbasket, but I have to admit that after all the years we were forced to watch them rubber stamp Bush's policies, its kind of enjoyable to watch them squirm. Just imagine all the angry calls and emails they are getting from conservative constituents!
  • kritt11
    The Democrats WERE ready to act- but they are not going to pass anything unless there is bipartisan support for it, and I don't blame them.
  • I'm a mix of liberal and conservatism when it comes to fiscal issues in government. I don't like this bailout, and I'm roughly 90% against it. There are other issues, and other sectors, in the economy that could use a boost before the largest corporations get their fill.

    What happens to the small businesses of 100 or fewer employees? Don't you think that they've had a tough time... for the last 3 or more years? This isn't a new situation of the past 5 weeks. If anything, large corporations should have been prepared for it better than anyone else, given their assets. Help the others that couldn't.

    1. Provide short-term, bankrupt-proof loans of $5-15k to small businesses with 2% finance fees over the course of 1-5 years.

    2. Provide medium-term, bankrupt proof loans of $25-$50k to small or medium (100-250 people) with 4% finance fee over the course of 5-10 years.

    3. Provide an emergency family loan of $250-$1k at 0% financing over the course of 1 year. If it's paid off, families are eligible for repeat loans. Continue this program for 5 years. If need be, up financing to 0.5%.

    4. Expand federal school loan programs to encompass students of any age (for those losing jobs), and at longer payment schedules if needed.

    5. Finance a public works programs for roads, bridges, and other infrastructure needing repair. Limit contracts to same-state companies and local workers as the first priority, with price secondary.

    6. Provide some system of protection where people 55+ can transfer their retirement funds from the stock market to government bonds without facing the threat of taxation during said transfer.

    7. Let the stock market self correct.

    8. Let the greedy large corporations lose their money and hold on America.

    9. Let Americans grow up and do the hard work of cleaning up the crap their government created when Americans got a bit lazy themselves.
  • Rudi
    Paleo-conservative Dan Larison's take on the Republicans response is priceless. The post is short, so I include the entire post.
    http://amconmag.com/larison/
    Great Leadership
    Wednesday, September 24th in politics by Daniel Larison

    The GOP loyalist response to McCain’s stunt has been predictable (right down to Gingrich’s Romneyesque call for a “workout, not a bailout”), and it says a great deal about what these people think constitutes leadership: opportunism, trying to hog the credit for other people’s work and, above all, a mindless dedication to taking action. No doubt, if these were what made for great leaders McCain would be the new Augustus.

    Laughably, Gingrich likens this to Eisenhower’s “I will go to Korea,” but unlike Eisenhower and the Korean war McCain has no credibility concerning the crisis he is supposedly addressing. In the end, knowing when you can contribute something and knowing when to avoid complicating an already difficult situation by intruding on ongoing negotiations is what separates grandstanding from leadership. It is what separates the simple egomaniacs from the ambitious pols who nonetheless have some idea what public service is. McCain’s belief that he is indispensable in a time of crisis is the surest sign that he is unfit for any office in republican government, much less the chief magistracy of the Republic.

    His take on Palin is even better.
  • Silhouette
    They're mad at their leaders for putting lipstick on the socialism pig.

    The free market is the free market: Free to prosper. Free to tumble.

    You have to take the good with the bad.
  • Mark -- you're right. I'm beyond cynical at this point. And it's not just McCain that I'm appalled by, though he's definitely the target (by virtue of having made himself one).

    Like most people, I think, I'm horrified by the entire situation. I cannot believe we (as in, ALL of us) are caught in this predicament. I vacillate between thinking we should just let the whole thing crash, and cringing back from the knowledge of what will most likely happen if we do.

    I truly hope that those we've elected to serve us aren't playing us all for fools. I hate it that I've reached a point of such distrust.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC