An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Debates, and the Law of Unintended Consequences

I’m really saddened by my reaction to McCain’s maneuver statement that he’s suspending his campaign in favor of rushing off to lead the country into the sunrise. I’ve discovered a truly deep well of cynicism about all things political lately.

And he wants the first debate postponed until the “crisis is over”? LOL! The elections could very well be over before we’re through this mess. No, I think now is an excellent time for these two aspirants, who have nothing but altruistic goals for the American people underpinning their White House ambitions, to speak to us.

It’s really unfortunate that the debate schedule was changed. Had the original topic order been followed, McCain and Obama would have been addressing the economy on Friday night, where they could have demonstrated their shared principles and concerns for our enlightenment. No doubt Congress would have fallen right into line behind them, and there’d be no need for the adults to return to DC.

Of course, those scheduling decisions were made back when the fundamentals of the economy were strong, and we were all living on Easy Street.

(*snort*)

But alas, both candidates wanted to talk about foreign policy first, and so the die was cast, leaving John McCain little choice but to reach, yet again, for his game-changing Mavericky Hat.

What a circus this all is.

  • JSpencer
    As a preface to my comment, I would like to remind folks that I've voted for D's, R's, and Indies in the past, and I voted for John McCain in 2000... but (and I'm sorry to say) this strikes me as another political gimmick. What's next, a suspension of the election? Gimma a break. There is plenty of room for the debate AND the work of government. John, John, John...
  • GeorgeSorwell
    I don't get this.

    There was a Civil War in this country and we didn't suspend electoral campaigning.
  • Marlowecan
    Polimom...

    I would argue that everything is political in an election year. People are just desperate not to want to "appear political".

    Recall the Iran Hostage Crisis. That was a very political issue in the 1980 election, which everyone was desperate to try to appear nonpartisan about . . .being political all the while.

    FDR was calculating political advantage throughout WW II. As was Churchill.
    They did their nations' business . . . but calculated nonetheless.

    McCain is doing the same here.

    After all . . . Obama's wanting McCain to issue a joint statement with him was similarly self-interested: He wanted to tie McCain to committing to a plan . . . removing the possibility Democrats had publicly worried about if they passed a plan with Bush, and McCain denounced it.

    Obama has the advantage at the moment. A joint statement would preserve his advantage on the economy.

    Why should McCain agree to that?

    McCain may well lose this election. But he will not be Bob Dole Redux.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Obama's wanting McCain to issue a joint statement with him was similarly self-interested


    True enough.

    But--maybe removing this issue wouldn't have preserved Obama's advantage. Wouldn't removing this issue from partisan politics have benefited John McCain even more, since this issue is such a loser for him?

    Not to mention, possibly making a solution easier to achieve? Wouldn't a solution have, possibly, detoxified this issue somewhat?

    Wouldn't McCain now be able to claim a successful example of bipartisanship in the face of all kinds of partisan jockeying for position? Which seems to have been the goal (unless, really, the goal was simply to avoid a public debate).

    Doesn't the notion of McCain trying to fix the economy just serve to remind the voters that he doesn't know much about the economy?

    Just because McCain is doing something unusual, doesn't mean he's doing something sensible.

    Or useful.

    Or even helpful to himself.
  • "Obama has the advantage at the moment. A joint statement would preserve his advantage on the economy. Why should McCain agree to that? "

    My understanding is that McCain did, in fact, agree to that.
  • Marlowecan
    GeorgeSorwell said: "Just because McCain is doing something unusual, doesn't mean he's doing something sensible."

    What you say is very true. But what McCain is doing is characteristically McCain, no? He plays wild cards that may be disastrous or inspired . . . or both. A lot of conservatives still have whiplash from the Palin pick, while a lot of liberals have not recovered their sensibilities from it.

    I have no idea at all how this will play out. But McCain has taken the initiative . . .which he had lost. Obama responded. Now it is McCain's turn.
  • Marlowecan
    "My understanding is that McCain did, in fact, agree to that."

    Polimom . . . the tic-toc sounds sort of confused, from what I have heard.

    I partly sympathize with Obama, as it seems he was blindsided on this one. As near as I can figure, McCain saw some opportunity to expand upon Obama's suggestion to have them both in DC leading the resolution.

    Anyhow, I will retreat to my position that while McCain may have meant well . . . I do believe it a very political gambit.
  • DLS
    If you want to be cynical and penetrating, consider that it may be a rare attempt by McCain also to lend support to the Bush administration -- though if you want to be more cynical than penetrating, it's also very much in McCain's self-interest, be he the next President or still in the Senate next year.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC