An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Is America Turning Socialist? It Always Was …: The Times of India


MAN’S SHIRT SAYS: ‘CITIZEN’
CAPTION READS: ‘RESCUE BRIGADE’
[Het Parool, The Netherlands]

What does it mean to be ’socialist?’

Now that the Bush Administration – regarded by many as the most right-wing, free-market, deregulation-oriented administration in living memory has opted for the largest tax-payer bailout of private business in world history – it’s a question of renewed relevance.

According to Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar of the Times of India, not only the United States, but the entire developed world is and has been ’socialist’ for a very long time.

Aiyar writes of the capitalist world at large:

“Modern capitalist states are all welfare states. Enormous bureaucracies have been created to tax the rich, regulate business, provide subsidies and special schemes to the needy, thwart environmental harm and health hazards, and so on. The list is long and keeps growing.”

Turning to the United States, particularly under President Bush Aiyar writes in part:

“Between 1970 and 2006, the number of pages in the U.S. Federal Register (which lists all regulations) shot up from 20,036 to 78,000. The number of regulators in the service of the federal government rose from 90,000 to 241,000. In the first six years of the George W Bush era (2000-2006), the number of pages of regulations increased by over 10,000, and regulators by over 65,000.”

Then using the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailouts as examples:

“Two of the nationalized corporations, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are by far the largest mortgage lenders in the world, with $5 trillion of mortgages and loans on their books. To put that in perspective, that’s five times the size of India’s GDP. … No nationalization in countries that profess to be socialist have ever been so large. … So much for the myth that the United States is a heartless capitalist ogre. In fact, it combines capitalism with welfarism and often tilts toward the latter when the two conflict.”

By Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar

September 21, 2008

India – The Times of India – Original Article (English)

Socialists like Hugo Chavez in Venezuela or Indira Gandhi in India, are famous for nationalizing the largest corporations. But the U.S. government has just taken over three of its biggest corporations within two weeks. Has the United States turned socialist? American right-wingers moan that this is indeed what has happened. Meanwhile, Indian leftists are stunned at nationalizations in a country they view as pitilessly capitalist.

Two of the nationalized corporations, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are by far the largest mortgage lenders in the world, with $5 trillion of mortgages and loans on their books. To put that in perspective, that’s five times the size of India’s GDP. The third corporation, AIG, is the largest insurance company in the world. No nationalization in countries that profess to be socialist has ever been so large.

Leftists suspect that the U.S. takeovers are simply aimed at rescuing wealthy shareholders. Not so. The government will acquire 79.9 percent of the shares of these companies at virtually zero cost, pushing the share price down close to zero. So wealthy shareholders have been wiped out, and the bosses of all three corporations have been sacked.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated and English-language foreign press coverage of the unfolding financial crisis.

  • DLS
    A good job of reporting! The USA has gone far from being truly free-market or being capitalist.

    We're not done yet with interventionism, either. The Dems are now stooping so low as to want to have bankruptcy judges rewrite mortgage contracts so as to permit the people who so often were greedy and took on mortgages they could not afford, to be officially sanctioned squatters.
  • lurxst
    So far I don't think people are realizing the magnitude of how this is affecting world markets, not just our own.

    This is disaster capitalism, grown out of disaster capitalism. Cheney, Bush and the Fed have certainly foreseen this eventuality months, maybe even years ago. Waiting until now to unveil their "fix"? Which when it comes is immediately written as a power grab, with nary an acknowledgement of oversight for the process?

    If the American people are going to buy all this debt then it really has to have transparency. I am still not convinced that letting the market eat itself is a bad thing all around. I have natural fears about the possibilities but I am pretty sure I could weather them. I feel remorse at the loss of US economic power, but we've seen nations recover from there own lurches. Is Bush going to leave anything behind thats not FUBAR?
  • Silhouette
    Study the French Revolution. We're about to see a preservation of our democracy with a lifesaving injection of socialism or we will watch it self-destruct with the narrow profiteering agendas of the elite.

    The similarities are so similar that it is stunning. You almost feel like you're reading today's issue of the New York times instead of an historical account.

    Read it. Know history or be doomed to repeat it.
  • JSpencer
    This isn't the only case of socialism bailing out capitalism gone off the tracks - it's just the largest in recent history. Think about the Iraq War (Bush's War) it's another case in point. Who is paying for it??? Socialism once again. And who profits? The military industrial complex - which if memory serves me correctly, was something a very decent man of integrity, a Republican president (most definitely not in the neocon mold) warned our country about. So many lessons we could have learned from history if we had cared to. But back to the topic, isn't it interesting how some of the greatest cheerleaders of freemarket capitalism have brought us straight to a socialist "solution"? Some food for thought there... to say the least.
  • Half_Past_Midnight
    Read it. Know history or be doomed to repeat it.


    Unfortunately, it's just begun. We are going to see the effects of this "bailout" for years. Right now, though, our biggest enemies are fear and ignorance. Seems that the candidates don't agree on "how much to tax the top one percent" of the wealthiest in the country. I say start with the excecutives' severance and go from there. Even Bush says "the World is watching", but do they really know what they are seeing?
  • kritt11
    JS- Good comment- and I agree completely.

    When an ordinary person makes bad decisions, Republicans urge that he suffer the consequences. Now that Wall Street execs are the ones whose asses and assets are on the line, they are urging a taxpayer bailout. Why? Because their mistakes were so all-encompassing that they risk bringing down our entire economy. Notice who was arguing yesterday that CEO's golden parachutes should be preserved in the bailout!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC