An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama and Democratic Racism

Last week, Joe Gandelman wrote an interesting piece regarding the AP – Yahoo News poll taken last week that addressed racial discrimination on the part of some Democrats in their decision whether to vote for Barack Obama. My question to the pundits is the following: did you really need a poll to tell you that some white Democrats are still racists?

Perhaps these politically-knowledgeable people did not take an American history course. For those historically-challenged people, here is the story of Democrats and race in an abbreviated version. It was the Democratic Party in the South that blocked voting rights for African-Americans for 80 years through Jim Crow laws. Most African-Americans were Republicans through the end of the 1950s, and the first post-reconstruction United States Senator was a Republican by the name of Ed Brooke from Massachusetts.

This excerpt is from Frances Rice: “During the civil rights era of the 1960’s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision ending school segregation.”

In fact, the crown legislative jewel of suffrage for African-Americans, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, was a political ploy of Lyndon Johnson to make sure that black folks would vote for the Democratic Party for the next two hundred years. I will not repeat the infamous quote of President Johnson; however, I will simply note that the “N-word” was used.

It is not a surprise to me that there is still some anxiety by some white Democrats to vote for Barack Obama. My surprise is that this anxiety is a shock to people who should know better. We are only 40 years removed from the assassinations of Dr. King and Malcolm X. Only thirty years removed from George Jefferson, Benson, and Huggy Bear, the television caricatures of African-American males. We are a nation that has only elected three African-American United States Senators and three Governors since 1870.

This is not a question about Barack Obama, his candidacy and his potential for leadership. It is my belief that even Colin Powell would face similar questions about race and voting. However, at the end of the day, these voters will make a decision between comfort and ability. The comfort of a white John McCain in spite of his policy flaws vs. the ability of Barack Obama, even though he is an African-American.

Comfort vs. ability…a decision that may be decided in black or white.

  • JSpencer
    While we're on the subject, let's keep going with the American history lesson a bit further. When those southern segregationist states in the south realized they were no longer going to be represented by the mainstream democrats (meaning their civil rights "challenged" attitudes and policies), they began the process of becoming republicans. Now we can see they are "red states". Sure, rascism exists among republicans and democrats, but if we're going to get a history lesson here, let's make sure we get the whole story eh? Also I think that (exceptions to the trend excluded) most folks who are objective and knowledeable about the subject would admit there generally exists more ethnic and gender based bigotry among republicans than democrats. Maybe this is in the process of changing, but I'd say it has a ways to go.
  • kritt11
    Wow, this is a twisted post. You left out the part where LBJ did as promised-- fulfilled the Kennedy legacy on civil rights. In 1965 Democrats were dominant in the WH and the Congress,Johnson had won in 1964 in a landslide, so it would have been totally unnecessary for Johnson to do this or the War on Poverty.

    Johnson alienated every ally he had in the Democratic party in the South in order to get the legislation passed. In 1968, Nixon had no compunction about capitalizing on the dissatisfaction of the segregationists to win.

    And, even if desegregation and the voting rights act WAS accomplished for a cynical motive, it needed to be done. Blacks were living a second class existence as maids and porters. Those who got too "uppity" in the South ran the risk of lynching. The perpetrators usually got off scot-free.

    Without Johnson we would have ended up like South Africa- an international embarassment with a white ruling society.
  • JSpencer
    Thank-you Kritt for completing that particular history lesson. This is an important enough era in our country's progress to warrant accuracy, and is important enough to understand what the predominant lesson was.
  • Marlowecan
    Excellent comment, Kritt!

    LBJ has long been one of my heroes.

    Crazier than a bag full of ferrets, to be sure. Totally corrupt as well. Yet, he was the true heir to FDR, and somehow empathized with the downtrodden in ways no other modern president has.

    His Great Society rejuvenated faded New Deal liberalism . . . and without his deal-making (yes, with northern Republicans too) the civil rights legislation would never have been passed.

    Yes, tragically, he immersed himself in Vietnam . . . and, as we have heard in his tape-recorded phone calls, believing the war unwinnable as early as 1964.

    But he was the last great Democratic titan. The US would have been a poorer place today without him. (I have always appreciated LBJ's wackiness . . . dictating memos while sitting on the toilet . . . and growing his hair like a hippie after leaving the White House. )
  • lgrf4evr
    I agree, LBJ might had been a warmonger with his history with vietnam but i still respect him for his accomplishments in the civil rights era.
  • nepr
    Hmmm... Why DID LBJ decide to dismantle the New Deal coalition? I guess it's possible to push the same question back to JFK, but, still... Almost 50 years later, the Democrats are still trying to get it back together.

    Leaving the "political ploy" idea aside (I assume LBJ could count), when I try to come up with a reason, words like "decency" and "integrity" and "compassion" come to mind, but, of course, they have no place in politics. Frankly, I'm stumped.
  • kritt11
    Marlowe- He was burning with ambition-- ( I hate to say this but I always thought it was possible that he and J Edgar might have had a hand in JFK's assasination) yet the presidency destroyed him. He couldn't sleep because he'd hear Vietnam protesters outside the WH chanting "Hey, Hey, LBJ, How many kids did you kill today?"

    I have a mixed opinion of him- he was tough and ruthless, and plunged the country into the tragic war in Vietnam based on fake evidence, yet he had compassion and humanity for those who were on the bottom rung in our society.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC