An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Palin: An Apocalypse Of A Different Kind

01aaapalin-autograph_1.jpg

John McCain’s last media availability was on August 13. Sarah Palin has not had a media availability in the 25 days since she burst on the national scene and has sat for only two interviews, one with ABC News at which she took offense because she was asked a few tough questions and one with the ever-indulgent Fox News that was a scripted love feast.

The Palin Cone of Silence shtick got old after a couple of weeks because it made light of a situation that is decidedly unfunny: The Republican campaign’s claims that the vetting-free Alaska governor is ready for prime time — and absolutely the gal to be a heartbeat away from the presidency of a septuagenarian with health issues — when she is being hidden from any semblance of it.

The WaPo notes that:

“Mr. McCain is entitled to choose the person he thinks would be best for the job. He is not entitled to keep the public from being able to make an informed assessment of that judgment. Ms. Palin’s speech-making skills are impressive, but the more she repeats the same stump speech lines, the queasier we get. Nor have her answers to the gentle questioning she has encountered provided any confidence that Ms. Palin has a grasp of the issues.”

Meanwhile, the one encounter with participatory democracy that Palin apparently can’t duck is the vice presidential debate, but even here there is mischief afoot.

Reports The NY Times:

“At the insistence of the McCain campaign, the Oct. 2 debate between the Republican nominee for vice president, Gov. Sarah Palin, and her Democratic rival, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., will have shorter question-and-answer segments than those for the presidential nominees, the advisers said. There will also be much less opportunity for free-wheeling, direct exchanges between the running mates.

“McCain advisers said they had been concerned that a loose format could leave Ms. Palin, a relatively inexperienced debater, at a disadvantage and largely on the defensive.”

Meanwhile, the daily round-up of lies and obfuscations about Palin’s career as a small-town mayor and then governor continue to pile up. And then there’s her belief in the end times, that Alaska will be the refuge for the faithful in the lower 48 states when the Rapture comes.

Sam Harris calls her out:

“Palin’s spiritual colleagues describe themselves as part of ‘the final generation,’ engaged in ’spiritual warfare’ to purge the earth of ‘demonic strongholds.’ Palin has spent her entire adult life immersed in this apocalyptic hysteria. Ask yourself: Is it a good idea to place the most powerful military on earth at her disposal? Do we actually want our leaders thinking about the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy when it comes time to say to the Iranians, or to the North Koreans, or to the Pakistanis, or to the Russians or to the Chinese: ‘All options remain on the table’?”

It must be said again. And again and again and again. Sarah Palin is a huge liability. Grossly-inexperienced and particularly-unsuited for this moment in American history.

Photograph by Jack Dempsey/The Associated Press

  • Marlowecan
    Shaun said: "Meanwhile, the daily round-up of lies and obfuscations about Palin’s career as a small-town mayor and then governor continue to pile up."

    I totally agree with Shaun here!

    Thus, is it safe to assume we can expect a post from Shaun denouncing the covert "grassroots" dissemination of the lie (retracted even by the NYT) about Palin being a member of an anti-American separtist party . . . a lie promoted covertly on YouTube by a Democratic PR firm linked to Axelrod - Winner & Associates?

    (See the fine Internet detective work over at Jawa - the PR firm has, of course, been furiously deleting accounts and traces of its work since Jawa exposed its dirty tricks).

    Or are lies and smears only lies and smears when they are openly spoken by GOP candidates . . . and not secretly by Democratic operatives?

    I fully agree that Palin is unqualified.

    Yet, it is interesting that Democratic party operatives are not content to stick with this clear issue . . . and persist (as Shaun notes incisively) in "the daily round-up of lies and obfuscations about Palin’s career . . . [that] continue to pile up."

    It will be enjoyable to read Shaun's scathing post on this daily promulgation of lies!
  • jwest
    Far from denouncing the lies and smears, here are the marching orders from Shaun’s cohorts:

    http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:2fro7-5mzjc...

    “It's all about finding really damaging stuff--news stories, YouTubes, informative blog posts. And then circulating those with the intent of having them work their way up the media stream. Email it to your friends. Email it to any journalists whose email you have. Post it in diaries or blog comments.”

    What a despicable group of people.
  • Right, jwest. As if your team is not doing exactly the same thing. But unlike Obama's campaign (of which the attacks you mention are not a part), McCain's ENTIRE campaign is about attempting to increase Obama's negatives while deceiving us about their strengths. Oh, and the other big difference? McCain's attacks and Palin's, are lies, coded and overt racism and the trademark tactics of the GOP, "fear and smear".

    That said, I agree with Marlo and Shaun that Palin is unqualified, and I have no problem denouncing sleazy tactics by Democratic sympathizers just as I do those of GOP partisans.

    Both above comments, though give the impression that Obama, or at least Axelrod, are behind the attacks. The Jawa report does not say so. In fact they admit it's conjecture; they were even directed by their legal department to disclaim it as conjecture.

    The supposed link to Axelrod is weak tea at best. Some who were involved may have been Obama "contributors" or "supporters." Come on, guys. Everyone who has created a sleazy McCain video is either a McCain contributor or supporter or both. That's supposed to be a "gotcha"?

    Next, the narrator may be (but has not been proven to be) the same as Axelrod has used. Again, So What? My brother does voice work. I'll tell you right now, with the economy in shambles, he might even do voice work for both Obama and McCain if paid to do so. Next?

    Well there is no next. Jawa is a partisan group trying to create a scandal on behalf of their candidate just like partisan groups on the other side. Be distracted if you want by these tempests in a teapot (omg, two tea analogies in one post). I'm going to stick to the issues. This is a serious time and we need to be serious about making our choice.
  • Oh, btw, jwest, I missed your condemnation of the people lying about Obama as being "despicable". How about it?
  • jwest
    I’ve called out people who have implied Obama was a Muslim and a homosexual.

    Yes, attacks like these are despicable. However, I invite you to try to find a conservative website calling for their readers to actively spread these types of lies.

    We have people on the right that we’re not particularly proud of, but we don’t institutionalize lying like the left.

    Hang your heads in collective shame, democrats.
  • jwest. Unbelievable bull ! McCain's official campaign has lied so much that even Fox news is calling them on it. Not so with Obama's campaign. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but you are lying.
  • mlhradio
    >>But unlike Obama's campaign (of which the attacks you mention are not a part), McCain's ENTIRE campaign is about attempting to increase Obama's negatives while deceiving us about their strengths. Oh, and the other big difference? McCain's attacks and Palin's, are lies, coded and overt racism and the trademark tactics of the GOP, "fear and smear".<<

    Listening to the pundits and campaign officials all day today on the cable news networks, and it was almost laughable. The cable talking head would ask the McCain official a question about some policy point about McCain, and the McCain spokesman/woman would immediately turn it around explain what was wrong with Obama's position. The cable talking head would then try and steer the conversation back to McCain, and the McCain flak would spend one sentence on McCain, then launch back to the anti-Obama lies and obsfucation. Sad, sad, sad.

    The one example that sticks out in my mind today, can't remember whether it was CNN or MSNBC. Cable guy asks McCain guy about paying for the bank bailout. McCain apologist immediately turns it around and says he has an even better question about how Obama will raise taxes on everyone or somesuch. Cable guy drily replies back that he thought his question was plenty good enough, and how will McCain address the multi-hundred billion bailout and pay for the War in Iraq, not what Obama will do. McCain apologist explains how McCain has never asked for an earmark, while Obama accepted hundreds of millions of dollars in earmarks, and blah blah blah. Cable guy then kinda gave up.

    I am not naive enough to think that politicians do not lie, and that there haven't been more than enough stretching of the truth from every politician since time immemorial. (This is nothing new - the swiftboat lies probably gave Bush the election). But the sheer magnitude and velocity of the outright, provable lies coming out of the McCain campaign are just breathtaking. All slime, all the time.

    But what disappoints me the most is how the fourth estate has largely given the McCain campaign a huge pass on most of their whoppers. I'd love for the press to get alot more vociferous in their reporting on the McCain lies. (I'd also be happy to see them knock the Obama campaign for their misstatements and truth-stretchers as well). The press, by and large, has been asleep at the switch. And the only thing worse than an ignorant electorate is an ill-informed electorate.
  • StockBoySF
    “McCain advisers said they had been concerned that a loose format could leave Ms. Palin, a relatively inexperienced debater, at a disadvantage and largely on the defensive.”

    So when Russia sits across the table from Palin and threatens to invade the Ukraine (or whatever), I suppose we can be assured that Russia will take into account Palin's inexperience and act accordingly....
  • JSpencer
    jwest : "we don’t institutionalize lying like the left."

    I sure hope you're wearing a bib.
  • DLS
    Shaun, will you ever grow up?

    Palin is more qualified than Obama. Eat it.
  • DLS
    "I sure hope you're wearing a bib."

    Illogical, and insufficient, in reality. What non-lefties often need is ARMOR.
  • DLS
    J. West -- don't be surprised, even if you are disgusted. Shame is so pre-1968 to those on the low end of the behavioral (and other kinds of) bell curve.
  • JSpencer
    DLS, it appears your reasoning powers are being surpassed by your typing skills.
  • onleyone
    [it] would be awful nice if folks here exchanged information instead of gotchas.

    that said, DLS deserved it. he is a crass, hyperpartisan hack.

    jwest:

    some here may not think so; but you're better than this. you're smart enough NOT to be a hack.

    but i'm sure i'll just get another "gotcha" for my trouble. counting down....
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC