An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Report: Biology May Shape Political Views

The Chronicle:

If conservatives and liberals can’t see eye to eye, it may be because their brains are wired differently from birth, according to researchers who have for the first time found a link between people’s political leanings and their physiology.

The researchers’ report, published in today’s issue of the journal Science, suggests that genetic differences may help explain why some people favor capital punishment and the Iraq War, while others support gun control and foreign aid. It’s part of a growing field, called “genopolitics,” that is threatening to rewrite the rules of political science, which hold that political beliefs are shaped by people’s environment and experiences. To work in the new field, political scientists are scrambling to learn genetics, neuroscience, and other aspects of biology.

This line of work is drawing together diverse research teams that include political scientists, geneticists, behavioral economists, social psychologists, and neuroscientists. It has also forced political scientists to broaden their training in the life sciences. At the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association last month in Boston, [University of Nebraska researcher and professor of political science John R.] Hibbing spent an afternoon teaching a course called “Genetics for Political Scientists.”

A Duke University critic, assistant professor of political science Evan Charney says, “I don’t think you can conclude anything from this, anything whatsoever.”

The Times Online, in referring to an image used in one of the two laboratory tests, headlines its story on the report, How scary is this spider? That may depend on your politics.

  • jwest
    I tend to agree with the premise that individuals are “wired” differently, and that this difference tends to show itself in the division of the parties.

    Since the early dawn of man, some ventured out to hunt, explore and advance civilization. These leaders ate meat, grew larger and more intelligent and took the best breeding females.

    Others stayed in the cave practicing their primeval interpretive dance, painting crude pictures on the wall with bat guano and whining about how unfair it was they weren’t getting laid.

    Today, you’ll find the same two groups locked in political struggle. Nothing’s changed.
  • pacatrue
    I haven't read the technical report, but coming from a cognitive science background, I am skeptical in the extreme.
  • jeff_pickens
    I loved jwest's comment!
    But it was interesting to read this:
    http://www.sltrib.com/ci_10500350

    I was surprised to see what characterization fit which party!
  • jeff_pickens
    One other interesting link:
    "The Difference Between Liberals and Conservatives" on TEDtalks.

    http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2008/09/j...
  • roro80
    I'm always highly sceptical of these evo-pop-psych things -- they usually take some crappy stereotype (men can't HELP but cheat!) and then say: see? It's just in their nature! As for this in particular, what about all those people who have some life-changing event (a trip, a disaster, a disease, a book, an encounter with a person, etc) that turns their potical views dramatically? Do the wires re-hook in their brain all of the sudden?
    Distopia scenario: the government does in-utero tests on all fetuses, and selectively aborts any of them with the "wiring" to oppose the ruling party...
  • DLS
    There's something to it if you want to engage in coarse characterization with a common duality that appeals to many if they want to look back to the positive, ambitious times as late as the 1960s with modern liberalism (before the late 1960s perversion from strife, riots, and radicalism that taints liberalism to this day along with other failures from going too far with interventionism, even if originally well-intended).

    That is the obvious division of optimists (positive, liberals) and pessimists (negative, conservatives) which has always been a handy tool (or weapon) to use politically.

    (Effective, too. Show young, attractive, smiling, sweet-and-exciting-talking liberal against grizzled old buzzard saying simply "No, no, no." Repeat until elections.)
  • DLS
    In a sense, you're right, insofar as with maturity normally comes conservatism (beginning with the realization that stupid or annoying behavior by juveniles and young "adults" is stupid or annoying, often followed by a newly found appreciation for what parents have to face, even before becoming a parent one's self). I say that is biological, in large part endocrinological (triggered by wrapup of physical maturity, not limited to the completed development of the frontal lobes). What also happens typically is one gets out of school and gets a better job and higher income, and if awake, is led to view with skepticism (at least) how much he or she pays in taxes, and for what these are being paid.
  • JWindish
    Great links Jeff! I really enjoyed the Ted Talk. Well worth the 18 minutes. I recommend it to everyone in the thread.
  • JSpencer
    "...which hold that political beliefs are shaped by people’s environment and experiences"

    Gee, d'ya think??? Who'da guessed??? Other then the obvious, I suppose this might venture into "the bell curve" territory... or not, but either way, I don't put much stock in it - even though it might be interesting to play around with.

    Btw, jwest, et al: I hunt, I fish, I'm about the outdoors thing, self-sufficiency, eating meat I shoot, etc. and I'm guessing you don't. So I reckon you know what you can do with your cute little theory. ;-)
  • jwest
    Spence,

    “I hunt, I fish……”

    Good for you. Trouble is, you’re just a few millennia too late.

    Meat has been replaced by money as far as providing goes, but don’t feel bad – you’re moving up the evolutionary ladder.

    If you’ll excuse me, I think I’ll go do the prom queen again.

    (heh)
  • JSpencer
    As usual you have trouble keeping your story coherent. That's the problem with living in a fantasy world I imagine.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC