An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

GOP Tries to Quash Palin Investigation Until After Election

In one of the more blatant moves to keep transparency out of the electoral process seen in some time, a group of Republican lawmakers in Alaska are filing suit to try to stop the abuse of power investigation of Governor Sarah Palin. As with many of the stories coming out of Alaskan politics of late, the cast of characters involved is probably even more interesting than the obvious nature of what they are trying to do.

Five Republican state lawmakers on Tuesday filed a lawsuit seeking to halt an inquiry into Gov. Sarah Palin’s dismissal of her public safety commissioner, arguing that the Legislature has exceeded its authority by conducting a “McCarthyistic investigation.”

The lawsuit, filed in the state’s Superior Court, comes as the McCain-Palin campaign has escalated its involvement in the bipartisan inquiry, providing Ms. Palin’s lawyer with help and mounting a public relations offensive.

I certainly agree that somebody is playing politics here, but this looks like it’s going to be an extremely tough sell for the local GOP and the McCain-Palin team. First of all, this was an investigation that began before Palin was ever named as the VP pick, and she previously stated that she would welcome the investigation and would cooperate. The Governor now has to find some way to walk back from those statements without making it look – as it clearly does – like they are trying to stop the process to keep the GOP presidential ticket afloat. There is also the matter of the individuals bringing this action. Of course they are all Republicans… that was to be expected. The group is comprised of Rep. Wes Keller, Rep. Mike Kelly, Rep. Bob Lynn, Sen. Fred Dyson, and Sen. Tom Wagoner.

It is worth noting that Wes Keller is an Elder in Sarah Palin’s church and she appointed him to his current seat. Of course, given the things we’ve learned recently about Palin’s apparent penchant for cronyism and nepotism, it might be difficult to find any governmental entity up there today not populated with her friends from church, high school classmates or fellow members of the Moose Hunt BBQ Club.

One of the problems with bringing in bench-warmers in the spin wars is that they tend to be rather ham-handed about it. Filing this suit might have carried a tiny bit more credibility if they hadn’t gone so far as to include the following phrase:

There is no nonpartisan reason that” the investigation “needs to be completed prior to the election on Nov. 4, 2008,” the lawsuit said.

They really should have run this paperwork past Rick Davis first in order to at least try to make it a little less obvious. My friend Ed makes note that the Republicans bringing the suit are complaining (among other things) that one of the Democrats heading up the investigation made a contribution to the Obama campaign. Imagine that… a Democratic politician contributing to his party’s nominee. He may have also said things supporting Obama and in opposition to Palin. Stop the presses! They may have partisan politicians in the Great White North also!

  • RememberNovember
    Last I heard the Alaskan AG ( and 3rd in line for Governor) put the kibosh on anyone subpeonaed from speaking. Sound familiar?
  • greenschemes
    By his own Admission this police officer tazered his own young child. That alone would get any police officer in America fired.

    Ida been really angry with her had she not had these morons fired. Who tazers their own kid and then defends it?
  • RevDave
    Ted Stevens, Don Young, Sarah Palin - not much difference. Good to see Alaskan corruption is non-sexist.
  • JSpencer
    “McCarthyistic investigation.” - Ah yes, another infamous Republican. How appropriate they would invoke McCarthy in their continued assault on democracy.
  • greenschemes you need to do a bit more reading. The trooper in question was never fired. He's still employed. And that's not what the investigation is about. It's about whether or not the Governor's office improperly sought to terminate another individual after pressuring him to take action in a local level case which was already under investigation.
  • RememberNovember
    apparently you haven't seen youtube lately- kids all over the country are doing these types of moronic stunts to themselves with tasers and light explosives.
  • kritt11
    Here's another Republican who sounds like a mixture of the worst of Bush and Cheney. Palin hires loyalists who must prove that they put her interests above the state's-- just as Bush has hired loyalists who put his interests above the country's. Her willingness to bypass the legal process in order to get desired results is reminiscent of Dick Cheney's. Of course her lawyer is now claiming the probe is tainted, so they can use it as justification for quashing it.
  • superdestroyer
    If all I read was Themoderatevoice, I would believe that Senator Obama is running against Governor Palin for president. when doing a search, yesterday and today, the mentions of Palin outnumber of mentions of Biden about 20-1. I wonder if Senator Obama would have taken a different VP is he realize that apparently everyone in the MSM hated Joe Biden.
  • Marlowecan
    Jazz...its rather worse than simply that "one of the Democrats heading up the investigation made a contribution to the Obama campaign."

    The Democrat in question you are referring to, who is in charge of the investigation - Hollis French - has predicted in interviews that: (1) this will be damaging to Palin; and (2) this will be an "October Surprise" (his words) for the McCain-Palin campaign.

    French has since backtracked, and openly admitted he should not have said those things, or linked the investigation in any way to the Presidential election. He defended himself, by saying other people will do the investigating . . . he just hires them.

    Problem is for your dismissal of this as being nothing, Jazz, is that the Democrat in charge of the investigation is now on public record as (1) prejudging the results of the investigation, and (2) clearly, overtly, and intentionally declaring the results will be an "October Surprise" for the presidential election.

    Of course this is a politicized investigation, Jazz. French would not be backtracking from his comments except for the fact they revealed how politicized his investigation was in his own mind.
  • kritt11
    SD

    Palin gave McCain's candidacy a boost among white women, conservatives and middle class voters. At the same time, she's an unknown, who may be called upon to step into the presidency, given the advanced age and medical history of John McCain. Her major international experience consists of looking across the Bering Sea to Russia.

    Also, Cheney has proven that the VP is no longer just for ceremonial duties, but can be a powerhouse behind the scenes.

    Biden was a safe pick, who caused little excitement or controversy. Most of his history and policy views are an open book. He's an older white male- who probably would never be called upon to take over for Obama- who is healthier and younger than McCain. Also no one is questioning whether Biden has the qualifications to assume the presidency if the worst DID happen.
  • greenschemes
    Jazz

    You make my point for me. The fact that a police officer was involved in an illegal activity and freely admits to doing it and then was never fired would cause me as governor to take action.

    This type of action would have gotten almost every police officer in America fired for their actions.
  • Ricorun
    Another element to the story is the new this morning that all inquiries about Palin's administration in Alaska are now going through the McCain campaign. What does that say about her readiness to lead if she has to be protected so thoroughly?
  • kritt11
    greenschemes

    then you would be circumventing the legal process-- which is what our present VP has excelled at. We don't need another VP that is willing to serve as a vigilante and corrupt the justice system.
  • jchem
    I think the Repubs trying to squash this is completely against their whole "reform" idea. But that shouldn't really surprise many, considering the campaign that they are running. The following is in the Anchorage Daily:

    "They have moved up the target date for issuing investigator Branchflower's report, so it will come out several weeks before the November election."

    http://www.adn.com/opinion/story/521259.html

    The rational was to "deescalate the political environment". The original release date was to be Oct 31. Perhaps the Repubs would like it to be released on the original date?
  • greenschemes
    Right.

    A police officer who admitted to child abuse should not lose his job. Riiiggghhhhtttt.

    I gotcha.
  • pacatrue
    Sarcasm is wonderful, greenschemes, but misses the point. The point is that Palin says the firing was above board. There is an investigation to check that, an investigation which Palin previously welcomed, declaring all was the way it should be. Now suddenly, everyone is clamming up and suing others to stop the investigation. Doesn't mean she's guilty of anything wrong, but it does mean she's actively doing her best now to make sure there is no investigation until after she's elected. Let's accept your take that everything is just the way it should be, finish the investigation, and move on.
  • kritt11
    Greenschemes-- No one is saying that. But what she allegedly did falls into the category of abuse of power.
    And apparently, the kid wanted him to tase him. So the guy is probably a colossal jerk who was guilty at the very least of bad judgement. That doesn't mean there aren't procedures for firing him.

    If she has nothing to hide-- why not cooperate as she initially promised? I don't think not cooperating with an ethics investigation will help her in a national campaign. Especially, since we presently have an administration that has refused to cooperate with congressional investigations.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC