An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

How the World Sees Palin—and Us

If you don’t give a hoot about how the rest of the world views our country, proceed no further. If you have a little bit of curiosity as to what other people, other countries think of us, then join me in taking a look at such views.

As a translator for WatchingAmerica.com, I scan the Dutch and Spanish newspapers for articles that, when translated, will give Americans a feeling of how Europeans (and others) see our elections, our candidates, and our nation. Other translators at Watching America translate similar articles from a number of other languages from around the world.

The newest entry into the elections melee, Sarah Palin, has in particular drawn a lot of attention and a lot of press abroad.

Scanning the most recent articles about Palin at Watching America, one notices a lot of curiosity about Sarah Palin, a lot of skepticism, some apprehension, but also some hope—and humor.

Let’s look at some of these:

In “John McCain‘s Folly,” the Al Rai, Jordan, writes on September 12:

U.S. Republican presidential nominee John McCain’s choice of Ms Sarah Palin as his running mate in the coming November election is rife with risk.

For starters, Palin is unknown to most Americans, even though she has been governor of Alaska since 2006. She is an extreme conservative on several issues, especially those which concern women, which distances her from moderate Republicans, let alone the Democrats whose support McCain is courting… But what is riskiest is that Palin is completely lacking in experience in international politics and several politicians question how this woman can fill the vacant seat of the nation’s President should McCain die during his term, especially given that he is over 72 years old…

In an article that needs no translation, “Forget the row about lipstick. It’s Sarah Palin’s politics that matter,” today’s edition of the U.K.’s The Guardian starts as follows:

To many Europeans, especially of a liberal bent, the emergence of Sarah Palin as one of the dominant forces in American politics is a cause for dismay. At first glance she seems to represent the triumph of the personal over the political. Her looks are remarked upon, her fashions critiqued. For supporters her status as a mother of five is touted as her greatest virtue. For others the Palin family is a source of sniping gossip.

And, The Guardian warns:

This is to overlook the substance of her beliefs. Palin represents an extreme form of conservatism. She is not just anti-abortion, she opposes abortion even in cases of rape or incest. And Palin supports the introduction of creationist ideas into the classroom, alongside evolution. She is sceptical of global warming, only recently accepting that human activities might play a role, flying in the face of vast bodies of scientific opinion – even the US government’s own advisers. She is pro-drilling for oil in environmentally sensitive areas in a world that needs to wean itself away from fossil fuels. Her grasp of foreign policy is limited to a series of hawkish and naive soundbites on Russia, terrorism and Iran.

And concludes:

America has had eight years of a government that has held similar views. The result has been to put ideological and emotional distance between it and large parts of Europe, Asia and Latin America….America needs a friendlier world to do economic and political business…The political beliefs exemplified by Palin and her fellow religious conservatives are not the answer, no matter how well presented by her considerable political skills. Change is the watchword of the American election. But McCain, in putting Palin on his ticket, is trying to pull off an audacious con trick. Palin does not represent change, but more of the same. And then some.

Also this weekend, The Observer, looks at the Alaska Governor, but in the context of her pregnant teenage daughter. The Observer introduces its lengthy article “How a small US town hailed its teen mums,” as follows:

High-school pregnancies, once a mark of shame, have become a badge of honour – and proved no barrier to Sarah Palin’s campaign. The new mood, fostered by Bush’s family and economic policies, is not confined to the rural South, but is apparent even in affluent Massachusetts. Now many fear the trend is threatening to erode hard-won women’s rights.

As to the latter, The Observer writes:

According to Mike Males, the Palin pregnancy has highlighted the broader cultural attack on women’s rights from both ends of the political spectrum. On the one hand, it has been used by liberals to emphasise the need for sex education, birth control and a woman’s right to choose. On the other hand, said Males, the issue of teen pregnancy has also been exploited by rightwingers: ‘There’s a deliberate demonisation of teenagers in order to impose restrictions on behaviour they deem unacceptable. In that way the Republicans can promote their own socially conservative agenda.’

Germany’s Nürnberger Nachrichten takes a look at the “boundless hysteria” in “Growing Doubts About “Sarah Superstar” :

The very first “Sarah Palin” Barbie doll design already exists. It shows the 44-year old Governor from Alaska in high heels and a tight black cocktail dress, with shoulder arms and a snowmobile as accessory.

Currently, the “Sarah Superstar” hysteria seems to know no boundaries in the United States – a hysteria that also affects politics

Palin’s “half-truths” and other more “juicy” comments have also not gone unnoticed by the German newspaper:

In her speech in St. Paul, Palin also claimed that she had saved the tax payer a lot of money by selling her predecessor’s company jet on Ebay. By now, this statement has been discovered not to be true… And then there are reports from ear witnesses who supposedly heard Sarah Palin publicly use improper language when talking about political rivals. She is reported to have called Hillary Clinton a “bitch” at the top of her voice while dining in a restaurant, and to have used the word “sambo” to describe Barack Obama – a term that, especially among African-Americans, is considered extremely pejorative.

In the South Korean JoongAng Daily‘s, “An Unverified Palin,” we read more about Palin’s celebrity status and how “Governor Palin has performed one great act for the public – reading the teleprompter.” :

A star is born. She must feel like Lord Byron who said, “I woke up one morning and found myself famous.” She is indeed a Cinderella in glass slippers. Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska, emerged as the star of America with an acceptance speech to be John McCain’s running mate at the 2008 Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota.

And,

Romans used to go crazy when a young white gladiator appeared in the Coliseum, where gladiators were mostly old and non-white. Senator Obama became a star with a speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2004, but he is running for president because he passed the rigorous verification process of a long primary. Verification of Governor Palin has only begun.

The JoongAng Daily‘s editorial writer and traveling correspondent concludes with the admonishment:

The U.S. presidential election is too serious for the country to be on a roller coaster ride because of a single, unverified vice presidential nominee. We Koreans know too well how reckless it is to ignore content and make a choice based on image alone.

With the ominous title, “Palin Willing to Wage War Against Russia,” The Finnish publication, Iltalehti, reports in its September 12 edition on Palin’s interview by ABC-News:

Palin was grilled with questions on foreign policy. Palin explained she believes in “God’s great plan for the world” and emphasized a strict policy towards Russia. Palin also thinks Goergia and Ukraine should be granted NATO membership. “We must keep an eye on Russia,” the Alaskan governor said, but added in the same breath that she hopes the U.S. avoids another era of Cold War.

When asked if the U.S. would wage war on Russia if Georgia was a NATO member and Russia invaded it Palin responded, “Maybe so.” “I mean that according to the NATO-articles the U.S. would have a duty to defend Georgia, even by starting a war against Russia”

Believe it or not, there is also a little bit of political humor in the foreign press when discussing our elections. The lead paragraph in the Brazilian O Globo‘s story, “Palin ‘Shuffles the Cards‘ of the U.S. Campaign,” says it all:

Attack a woman like Palin, and the result is to turn her into a victim of machismo, sexism, prejudice, etc. Turn your back on her, and you will emerge with a beautiful bite on your behind.

But there are also more sober and objective assessments of the U.S. elections in the foreign press. For example, in the Dutch De Telegraaf in “Obama’s Land or McCain’s Land,” we read:

Obama was previously a community worker, fresh out of Harvard. “But in the United States, one does not win elections with that,” they say there. Perhaps it is the same with McCain‘s POW experience in Vietnam, where he really learned to love America. It is thus really hawk against dove, right against left, red against blue, anti-abortion against liberalism.

Both parties have nominated unlikely candidates, who want to bring an end to the polarization in Washington and to the influence of big money. Obama shows understanding towards opponents of abortion. McCain wants to have Democrats in his cabinet. The campaign also reflects a changed America. The influence of citizens, united by the Internet, has never been greater.

Traditional stereotyping is being pushed to the side: Obama stands for a “post-racial“ generation that has left discrimination behind. And Republicans have launched a feminist icon with their working anti-abortion-mother Palin.

There are sufficient signs to believe that it is possible that America will take a step forward with the next president.

Finally, this compendium would not be complete without mentioning an outrageous and hilarious (assuming the two adjectives can co-exist) article in Russia’s Pravda (The same newspaper that claimed John McCain was an Egyptian. Apparently Pravda confused the Panama Canal Zone with the Suez Canal Zone–see “Can Egyptian Born McCain Be President?”)

Here are some quotes from Pravda’s “Palin —the Devil in disguise”:

The candidate for the Vice Presidency of the United States of America, whose experience in small town politics, mothers´day [sic] dos and the local hockey club is her claim to fame, threatened to open the gates of Hell by attacking Russia in the event of another invasion of Georgia in a televised interview on ABC (shown today). One question for this self-opinionated upstart: Do you know what a nuclear holocaust is?

Sarah Palin, Mrs. Nobody know-it-all shrieking [sic] cow from Alaska, the joke of American politics, plied with a couple of vodkas before letting rip in front of incredulous audiences while McCain coos in the background, cuts a ridiculous figure as she strives to be taken seriously.

So Sarah Palin, Mrs. Hockey Mom housewife-cum-small-town gossip merchant and cheap little guttersnipe, suppose you shut up and allowed real politicians and diplomats to do their work? Threatening Russia with a war is perhaps the most irresponsible thing anyone could do at this moment in time. Have you any idea what a nuclear holocaust is? Have you any notion of the power of Russia’s armed forces? Did you know that Russia has enough missiles to destroy any target anywhere on Earth in seconds?

And have you not forgotten, you pith-headed little bimbo from the back of beyond, that small detail about the slaughter of Russian citizens by Georgians, which started the whole debacle? So next time suppose you keep your mouth shut and while you’re at it, make sure the members of your family keep their legs shut too. Your country has enough failed mothers as it is.

For those who have stuck with me this far, there is one redeeming piece in the Pravda article: a picture, and it is not of Sarah Palin.

  • DLS,
    I, for one, love Sarah Palin. She embodies all that's wrong with Republicanism and American conservatism. All in one endlessly entertaining package.

    She is the archetype.
  • DLS
    "Pravda" with all it implies in our Cold War past (and worse, adding the post-60s radical pathology that includes hatred) applies to our media and lefty talkers too often right now insofar as Sarah Palin and their fear and loathing of her and the GOP's boosted prospects of winning the White House are concerned.

    Note to a non-thinker on here: Many in Europe are liberal, not "the rest of the world," even if you only care about, or idolize, European "social democracy" (democratic socialism) and those with elitist tendencies to whom disdain or contempt for the USA are the fashion, even while envious of it and having parasitized USA protection of western Europe in the past.
  • DdW
    Redfish:

    1. I believe I stated upfront that I was quoting from the most recent available Watching America translations. I am sure there have been and there will be more complimentary views of Sarah Palin in the world press, and also less complimentary ones. (A couple I quoted, weren't bad). The Pravda one was thrown in, again as I mentioned, because of its outrageousness (and hilariousness).

    2. With respect to Palin being a Margaret Thatcher, I wish I had seen that one. It would have been good for a few laughs.
  • JSpencer
    Academic, my tendency is to react to long-winded diatribes with a comment about the merits of brevity, partly because I have a limited window here in the morning, and partly because I'm suspicious of the need for "extended" commentary. This time I'll forego my usual response, and just say this: As a 56 year old American who used to hold a more joyful and reverent view of my country, I regret having to agree with most of the views you express here. Neither candidate will be a magic bullet in any sense of the word (regardless of what a naive electorate might imagine) because so much damage and incompetence has been inflicted by our current government. The digging out process won't even be started though if the next president we elect is 90% + in agreement with the current one. America needed to get a clue years ago... needless to say, it's even more true now. It's time to get back on the tracks.
  • DdW
    Academic ( Professor Collymore):

    Just saw your comments. I want to take my time to read it and digest them. But, thanks for taking the time to read and comment on TMV
  • Academic
    This is especially for Michael Graham at the Boston Herald, all those female PUMAS out there, their grotesquely disturbed supporters, and their collective surrogates in the media who’ve no idea of, or else cynically debauch what the so-called fourth estate is really all about. Who prostitute the news when they’re not actually making it up that is, and wouldn’t have the slightest clue of what analytical journalism is all about – because you’re essentially nothing more than mediocre hacks in a business that sees money and transient headlines-grabbing as the be all and end all of your pathetically sad and corrupt lives that are themselves spurred on by nothing more than the next lowest common denominator sound bite - and as a proxy thrive on smears, innuendos and falsehoods: lies, and downright ones at that, in other words. And that’s why I dare you to print this riposte to your consistent and paranoid abuse of the media and the intelligence of those like myself who read you only to familiarize ourselves with the latest shenanigans that you’re getting up to, so as to be able to counter them.

    What Michael Graham says in his transparently disingenuous attack on Barrack Obama’s pig with lipstick observation – no such phoney outrage when John McCain used it about Hillary Clinton - is the kind of remark that one would expect from someone who has a deep Oedipus complex. Did you actually sleep with your mother Michael? No wonder you are so depraved. Crying phoney sexism is always the last resort of the adult - male as well as female - who as a child has been subjected to physical and sexual abuse at the hands of a parent or guardian usually but not exclusively of the opposite sex and is still stuck in that distant time warp. And you are a classic example of this syndrome Michael Graham; while intelligent people like me from around the world, and most notably from the United Kingdom and mainland Europe, who’ve vigorously campaigned for and actually done something about feminine equality over many decades in which we have been involved in this crusade when it wasn't fashionable in the United States, know what real sexism is. That's why in Europe - from Britain to Germany to Finland - and even in countries like India, Sri Lanka and Israel we've had women leaders in our respective countries, while the United States still lags in the sewers of male chauvinism.

    All of these largely working class and clearly uneducated white men who now excitedly cheer Sarah Palin to the rafters and declare they will vote for her and John McCain in November regardless of their idiotic policies, or more to the point their obvious lack of any substantive ones as they simultaneously level their phoney sexist slurs against Barrack Obama, have you noticed how they always couch their enthusiasm for her with words like man "she’s hot!" Tell me Mr Graham, do you really think that such openly voiced phrases actually relate to Sarah Palin’s intellectual abilities or has anything to do with the skills she requires to run a country armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons and other WMDs in what is a very dangerous world, principally in that state of affairs because of the imperialist antics of the Republican Party and the stupid machismo of those Americans who support it? I think not.

    Furthermore, the United States of America has always been a white, male-dominated and white, male-run society. These white males were and are exclusively the sons, husbands, lovers and male relatives of white women, who have fucked with them, slept in their beds, cheated with them as Cindy did with John McCain, lied for them, thoroughly forgiven them for their indiscretions as Hillary Clinton and the terminally ill Elisabeth Edwards have done, raised their kids and cared for these men. And if after all that intimacy they were, or are still incapable of influencing these same white men, failed for such a long time to persuade these men to let them have the vote and, to use the current buzz phrase, see their chance to break through the supposed glass ceiling either blocked or severely restricted by these same men, tell me, clever clogs Graham, whose fault is that? Surely not Blacks, who were and still are at the bottom of the social and economic pile in racist USA; and certainly not that of Barrack Obama who against the odds has, unlike you, excelled at what he's put his mind to and has done his very best to rise above the gutter instincts of the likes of you Michael Graham in the noble endeavour to create a better and more equitable America for everyone regardless of race, gender, social status, sexual orientation or religion.

    Let’s be forthright here, these are the very same men and women who themselves become the abusers in adult life and comprise the huge reservoir of most of America’s secret paedophiles. The same empty-headed morons who not only relish but also instinctively dish out whatever gratuitous abuse and violence they’re capable of because that’s all they know; who intuitively like to kick ass, and the weaker, more racially or culturally different that their chosen victims are perceived to be the better they feel – that’s why they gravitate in their mindless hordes to a like-minded and self-styled pit bull massif without any noticeable redeeming qualities like Sarah Palin; for that, alas, considering the parochial and unstimulating world they come from and blissfully inhabit, is all they’re familiar with and can readily empathize with.

    Who would have thought it let alone be able to convincingly make it up - Sarah Palin now hilariously acclaimed as a celebrity and rock star by the same people and media who before she unexpectedly and despairingly on the part of John McCain and Karl Rove erupted on the political scene, both saw and utilized these very terms as derogatory epithets when applied to Barrack Obama? And they tell us we’re in the 21st century. Yet we have a bunch of redneck racists and reactionaries, dumb bimbos and the like, who convince themselves that we’re still living at a time when their sort ruled the roost at home generally and the world in particular. Dream on!
    Am I the only one to see through the nauseating pretence of the yellow-bellied cowards, who for all their Nazi-style clamour and sheep-like obeisance to the puerile but nonetheless concerted, jackbooted onslaught and fascist agenda orchestrated these past seven and a half years by America’s neo-cons led by the likes of Karl Rove and Dick Cheney and that John McCain and Sarah Palin are unashamedly signed up to, and that have blighted the hopes and aspirations of many of the world’s inhabitants, as well as caused many millions of them to be callously massacred and displaced – that these evil clowns who don’t have the guts to spew out their one real reason for berating Barrack Obama, which rests squarely on their innate, guilt-ridden, paranoid and insidious racism (the huge but unspoken about elephant standing in the corner of the living room) now want to attack Russia: a country bristling with thousands of thermonuclear weapons - not new clear ones, the words that had to be placed on Sarah Palin’s teleprompter at her convention acceptance speech because she had no knowledge of what thermonuclear meant and couldn’t pronounce the correct spelling of that word. Talk about Americans having a death wish!

    By the way, the original Nazis ended up being comprehensively defeated by the victorious Russians when an overwhelming fascist leaning and German-sympathetic America that chose to let us British, our Commonwealth countries and naturally Russia (France had already caved in to the Nazis) fight the Third Reich and its many willing European satellites on our own, on the disingenuous claim of its own neutrality, just as both grandfathers of your incumbent president, George W. Bush, acted as the Nazis’ international banker and supplier of the lethal Zyklone B gas that the Nazis used in their death camps to eradicate Europe’s Ashkenazi Jews (those who no postwar US president can now run for office without sucking up to; how strong is the power of guilt!); that continent’s gypsies (who don’t get any mention nowadays of what also happened to them even though they’re still widely discriminated against); and those other unfortunate victims who the Germans classified as undesirables. And lets not forget to remind ourselves that the US only came into the war after the Japanese, allies of the Germans, had attacked Pearl Harbour. So you’re in superb fascist company America with a Republican presidential and vice-presidential candidates who’re also morally bankrupt.
    In John McCain’s case a well-known serial adulterer, groper and wife deserter; and from all accounts Sarah Palin’s private life is no better than his. In short, they’re both lying hypocrites. But many white American women who’re leaping on the Sarah Palin bandwagon can readily relate to this, since all the empirical data there is show unequivocally that 46% of them either cheat on or have consistently cuckolded their husbands or live-in partners, and some 39% of the children they produce aren’t the biological offspring of the named fathers. So what you have, in reality, is a lot of macho American men firing blanks or being purposely duped and don’t even know it. Little wonder then that Sarah Palin and John McCain for contradictory reasons are role models to these two specific constituents of cretins. Angered are you? Then I dare those of you who disagree to go have your alleged “kids” DNA tested. After all, you’ve nothing to fear but the truth!

    I served with the British Royal Air Force and had I crashed one plane, let alone five, in the manner that John McCain did I would have been summarily court-martialled and jailed for a very long time. What we detect in John McCain’s case is logic turned completely on its head. And for those who have selected memories, Vietnam like Iraq was an illegally waged war on the part of the United States, whose administration then as now lied to its own citizens about the reasons for starting it; and, crucially, a war you unmistakably lost. Made a POW, as John McCain was, for far longer than America participated in World War Two isn’t a triumph but, more exactly, is seen by all prescient-minded persons as an unmitigated failure to effectively carry out a set mission. Tortured when captured by the Vietnamese after John McCain and others like him from the relative safety of powerful, high flying war planes were dropping napalm and other deadly weapons on innocent and defenceless Vietnamese men, women, children and the elderly isn’t a position from which to claim the moral high ground. After, all what would Americans have done in a similar situation if foreign forces had illegally invaded their country and were doing the same thing to them?

    And if in the warped minds of John McCain and others who share his obsession with a false analysis of the Vietnamese War the Hanoi Hilton was an academy for honing his so-called leadership skills, is the same ludicrous argument also going to be advocated by these selfsame Americans with respect to the illegally renditioned and incarcerated inmates that the United States of America in open contravention of the Geneva Conventions, international law and the explicit condemnation of civilized countries worldwide holds in Guantanamo Bay, Bagram, Abu Grahib, and the other secret gulags and prisons that it operates around the world?

    John McCain isn’t very clever in general or, more specifically, intellectually. And had he not been the son and grandson of US admirals he would most certainly have been hastily kicked out of the military academy where he was sent to and allowed to “graduate” even though by his own lurid accounts he’d failed miserably academically and in all other respects. The man also has a vile temper and poor judgement: characteristics that are patently unsuited for some one aspiring to the presidency of a country that is a nuclear superpower.

    Here’s what the columnist Michael Tomasky of the British Guardian newspaper had to say about him in the Saturday 13 September edition of that paper:
    “McCain’s campaign is all the more shameful considering that he’s doing many of the exact things that were done to him by George Bush’s campaign in 2000 – and employing some of the selfsame people who did it to him to do it to Obama…But as the old saying goes, a lie can get halfway around the world before truth even gets its boots on, and so here we are.”

    And this from the Guardian’s editorial of the same date:
    “The overriding consideration should therefore have been to select as a running mate a man or woman with the ability and authority to take up the reins should they fall from Mr McCain’s hands. Mr McCain has done the exact opposite. Mrs Palin steered herself through her first interview this week with the nervous intensity of a well-prepared candidate for catechism who was nevertheless not quite sure of her ground on the sacraments. She is not experienced, and if she has ability it has been demonstrated only at a very low level. It speaks volumes that she is being kept from the press while being tutored at breakneck speed.”

    We’ve had enough wars in the past seven and a half years of the Bush/Cheney administration. Do we need more of them and this time instigated by the reckless actions and Rambo-style politics of a John McCain/Sarah Palin administration that could easily catapult mankind into a thermo-nuclear holocaust or Armageddon? Or are Americans, and not just their politicians, now openly showing the rest of us what at heart they really are – the world’s Fourth Reich. In which case, “Sieg Heil Amerika!

    British but unable to vote in the US elections even though the decision of you Americans will have an impact on the lives of the rest of us who live in this world I'm a Barrack Obama supporter, like many of my fellow citizens in Europe and around the world, because we all feel he is currently your country's best hope to avoid a military Armageddon foisted on the rest of mankind. But part of me perversely wants John McCain and Sarah Palin to win. For I know that before long America will be at war again, but this time specifically on its own and with no coalition of the willing to help save it out from its self-imposed folly. And hopefully all the mutter f--kers of you in that parochial country across the pond will in your droves be sent off to fight and lose your lives in the manner of the expendable trash that you are. But somehow I don't think that those of you, for all your jingoism and fake patriotism with regard to the United States, will be among those who'll be the first in line to volunteer and put your lives in harm's way. No, history manifestly shows that craven cowards like you and Michael Graham perpetually leave that for others to do. As we say in Britain, you’ll be quite willing to defend the US to the last drop of someone else’s blood.
    Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore London, United Kingdom.
  • ThinkingOnMyOwnTwoFeet
    Most of the world is liberal, so it's no surprise that the rest of the world would try to make her look as bad as they can. As for the German excerpt, I don't for a second believe she ever called Hillary the "b----" word or Obama the "s----" word.
  • redfish
    You're aware that newspapers like The Guardian, and Pravda are left-wing in their own countries?

    Europeans tend to be more on the left than Americans anyway, which contributes a lot to their dislike of Bush and support of Obama, but several of the papers that you selected I know are even considered left biased in Europe, and there are other voices.

    Here are some to start off with:

    UK:

    "Oh boy. I don't know what is going to happen next in the Sarah Palin story, but one thing is now for sure: John McCain has picked an Alaskan Margaret Thatcher to be his running mate. "
    Tim Reid, Times Online

    "I am a liberal, but I'm blown away by Sarah Palin... My liberal friends were outraged when rumours about Barack Obama attending a Madrassa or being a Muslim surfaced on the internet, but all week they have been gleefully trading emails of Sarah Palin distortions."
    Sarah Johnson, Telegraph

    "There are few sights more bloodcurdling than the liberal pack in full cry. The viciousness of the attacks on Sarah Palin is a testimony to the degree of panic her appointment has generated in Leftist circles.
    t would seem that it is only sexist to trash a woman candidate if she is a Woman Candidate, which is to say a liberal.
    The Evangelical churches have made it their particular mission in recent years to support teenage mothers and urge their families to stand by them. So where is the shame in this situation?"
    Janet Daley, Telegraph

    "I wonder if the USA has found its Margaret Thatcher. Strident and self confident - immensely grating on those who do not like her, but immensely pleasing to those who do...
    Everyone in the UK is worried President Palin will declare war on Russia mistaking it for an errant dinosaur, though I think this piece is reasonable in pointing out that she was hardly declaring the Russia war, just playing tough."
    Justin Webb, BBC

    Germany:

    "The fact that the American media went after her immediately after McCain announced her nomination -- the accusations ranged from naiveté to dishonesty -- also didn't hurt. "
    Gabor Steingart, Der Spiegel
  • onleyone
    DDW:

    you're right -- killer shrimp! nice touch.

    (only kidding.)

    what is that supposed to be -- the Whore of Babylon out of Revelations? just a guess.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC