An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

McCain-Palin butchers FactCheck.org – supporters need to rebuke them

The latest McCain-Palin ad, on TV and their e-mail list to supporters, implies that FactCheck.org blamed the Obama campaign for “completely false or misleading” rumors about Sarah Palin. Curious to see what this report was, I visited FactCheck, associated with the Annenberg Public Policy Center, and saw they didn’t appreciate the campaign’s creative interpretation of their report:

There is no evidence that the Obama campaign is behind any of the wild accusations that we critiqued. There is no more basis for attributing these viral attacks to the Obama campaign than there is for blaming the McCain campaign for chain e-mail attacks falsely claiming that Obama is a Muslim, or a “racist,” or that he is proposing to tax water. The anti-Palin messages, like the anti-Obama messages, have every appearance of being home-grown.

I’m not swooning for Obama, I have to make clear. I’m pretty sure his presidency would resemble others where Democrats controlled everything – most recently 1993-95 and 1977-81, which no one is looking forward to revisiting. Divided governments seem to get quite a bit done, including bringing down the Soviet Union, welfare reform, and more recently, the electronic surveillance compromise that Obama got so much crap for eventually supporting. But there’s no excuse for the Republican ticket to butcher this report by FactCheck, which politely calls the ad “less than honest.” The campaign can say they think Obama operatives are pushing the rumors, and with any luck, find some evidence of that, without twisting someone else’s report.

With his numbers rising, and his Obama-esque running mate throwing off the Obama camp, it’s unlikely that the McCain campaign will relent on aggressive ads. Indeed, I’m scratching my head to remember a single presidential race where negative ads weren’t a huge boon to the winner. If men were angels, no hit piece would be necessary.

I suppose that means that only strong supporters of the Republican ticket – especially Palin’s mom-throngs – can tell the campaign when it has crossed an ethical line, and not have the message be interpreted as Obamania by the media. Especially as two people who claim to be followers of Jesus Christ – never mind the eventual destination of their handlers – McCain and Palin should be held to a high standard by fellow believers. I’m going to write to the campaign now and tell them where I think they’ve lapsed, and how I think they can make it right, so that my enthusiasm doesn’t wane. I hope I’m not alone.

  • elrod
    When I spoke with Brooks Jackson of Factcheck.org the other day he mentioned that campaigns sometimes inappropriately cite his work. I thought it interesting that this happened the very next day.
  • Don Quijote
    I’m not swooning for Obama, I have to make clear. I’m pretty sure his presidency would resemble others where Democrats controlled everything - most recently 1993-95 and 1977-81, which no one is looking forward to revisiting.


    You may not, but many of us do after all someone is going to have to fix the damage inflicted on this country by eight years of Shrub and his cronies in the White House.


    Divided governments seem to get quite a bit done, including bringing down the Soviet Union



    Divided Government didn't have a goddamn thing to do with bringing down the soviet Union, forty years of cold war started by a Democrat, Truman and pursued by every single administration following it did the job, not Bush, it just ended on his watch.

    , welfare reform, and more recently, the electronic surveillance compromise that Obama got so much crap for eventually supporting.


    let me correct the rest of this sentence for you
    , "the fuck over the poor "reform, and more recently, "the use the constitution to wipe my ass" compromise that Obama got so much crap for eventually supporting.


    I suppose that means that only strong supporters of the Republican ticket - especially Palin’s mom-throngs - can tell the campaign when it has crossed an ethical line, and not have the message be interpreted as Obamania by the media.


    And that will happen sometimes after hell freezes over.
  • pacatrue
    I believe technically the ad violates the Copyright Policy at FactCheck, but probably not in a way that is going to trigger a legal penalty. Here's the relevant portion:

    Original FactCheck.org articles and Special Reports may be reprinted or distributed, without charge, and in any media. We ask that the editorial integrity of the article be preserved. We prefer that you copy and distribute the entire, original work without editing, but you may distribute an excerpt. If you distribute an excerpt, you should not edit the original in such a way as to alter the message or otherwise misrepresent the facts or opinions expressed.

    It is of course the last sentence which the McCain campaign expressly did.
  • RevDave
    In Iowa, we call this a LIE. We are losing count of how many lies this campaign tells in a given day, let alone in the entire campaign. More of the same.
  • SteveK
    In California, we call this a LIE, too.

    Fortunately, some are keeping track... 27 LIES at last count:

    Lies To Nowhere

    From the day he nominated Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AZ) to be his vice presidential running mate, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and his campaign advisers have been repeating the lie that Palin opposed the infamous Bridge to Nowhere. (In fact, Palin repeatedly expressed strong support for the project.) ThinkProgress has been keeping track of these lies and compiled them here. Please let us know if we’ve missed any, and you can comment on this document here.

    ***


    [Follow link for dates / times / and places]
  • vwcat
    the reason the mccain camp is doing this to factcheck to eventually discredit them in the eyes of the public.
  • daveinboca
    Blah blah blah....Obama has told a hundred lies already during this campaign & y'all are fixated on a Veep candidate! Ha ha ha!

    You know that Sarah is bouncing around inside Obama's melon on a 24/7 basis and to watch the YouTube is to see that Barry was trying a stand-up schtick that went horribly wrong. The first half had the crowd in titters as it got the reference---he just tried a double-bank cheap shot and now the MSM is trying to pull his chestnuts out of the fire [metaphor alert!]

    BHussein-O is unaccountable and is now running to media morons like Letterboy to help extricate himself from his silliness. He flipped a bird to Hillary & the MSM gave him a pass on that---maybe he doesn't like strong women?

    Now he's got 30 PIs & lawyers & operatives crawling under rocks in Wasilla to dig up whatever dirt possible. In the meantime, Rezko, Ayers, & Rev W[rong] go essentially unexamined by a corrupt rotten media obsessed with electing an empty suit.
  • Rudi
    Daveinboca, please cite his hundred lies by a few links from FactCheck. McCain bus and plane are called StraighhtTalk. Are you saying lies and spin are Straight Talk?
  • Rudi
    Daveinboca, please cite his hundred lies by a few links from FactCheck. McCain bus and plane are called StraighhtTalk. Are you saying lies and spin are Straight Talk?
  • Come on Greg.
    What's more likely, that McCain will continue the track of the last 8 years, or that Obama will continue the policies of Jimmy Carter?

    And divided gov't brought down the Soviet Union? Wha? The arms race brought down the Soviet Union. Their controlled economy wasn't strong enough to subsidize the kind of money they were spending on defense.
  • pacatrue
    To sum up daveinboca's comment: Obama lies and therefore I encourage my candidates to do so as well. And I'm going to repeat falsehoods explicitly debunked in the very FactCheck article I am discussing.
  • Leonidas
    ROTFLMAO

    Obamamaniacs have trouble facing the truth. Explains alot about why he won the democratic nomination. The McCain ad never attributes the Fact Check analsis to the actual Obama campain BTW, just to Obamamaniac attacks.
  • Leonidas
    "Come on Greg.
    What's more likely, that McCain will continue the track of the last 8 years, or that Obama will continue the policies of Jimmy Carter? "


    Jimmy Carter should be replaced with Socialism
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC