When Obama talks about his background, he needs to know what he is talking about, rather than saying something off the wall like Kennedy was “responsible for his very existence”. He did say this in a speech to a civil activist group probably because of the selective crowd present:

“In a speech to a Selma, Alabama crowd meant to pump up his civil-rights movement authenticity and his Kennedy Camelot image, Barack Obama claimed that the Kennedy administration paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and therefore was responsible for his “very existence”. However, the first march on Selma took place on March 7, 1965. Obama would have been about three and half years old at that time. For some reason the media never did the math on this.”
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/20…
Whether the speech writer planned it this way is irrelevant. Accuracy is a key when you talk about where you came from.

Here is a list of inconsistencies on what Obama is on record as saying that pertain to his ability to remain focused and decisive in an executive position:
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/

If you want to discuss this further, I am open to that. Both campaigns do appear to be about smearing lately, so I am not letting anyone off the hook here. I have observed Obama in interviews and before the public, and I have not seen a secure presentation of his ability to lead. When the debates begin, we will see who comes out more sure of themselves. It's one thing to have good intentions, it's a whole other ballgame to be able to follow through with a solid stance.

When Obama talks about his background, he needs to know what he is talking about, rather than saying something off the wall like Kennedy was “responsible for his very existence”. He did say this in a speech to a civil activist group probably because of the selective crowd present:

“In a speech to a Selma, Alabama crowd meant to pump up his civil-rights movement authenticity and his Kennedy Camelot image, Barack Obama claimed that the Kennedy administration paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and therefore was responsible for his “very existence”. However, the first march on Selma took place on March 7, 1965. Obama would have been about three and half years old at that time. For some reason the media never did the math on this.”
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/20…
Whether the speech writer planned it this way is irrelevant. Accuracy is a key when you talk about where you came from.

Here is a list of inconsistencies on what Obama is on record as saying that pertain to his ability to remain focused and decisive in an executive position:
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/

If you want to discuss this further, I am open to that. Both campaigns do appear to be about smearing lately, so I am not letting anyone off the hook here. I have observed Obama in interviews and before the public, and I have not seen a secure presentation of his ability to lead. When the debates begin, we will see who comes out more sure of themselves. It's one thing to have good intentions, it's a whole other ballgame to be able to follow through with a solid stance.

When Obama talks about his background, he needs to know what he is talking about, rather than saying something off the wall like Kennedy was “responsible for his very existence”. He did say this in a speech to a civil activist group probably because of the selective crowd present:

“In a speech to a Selma, Alabama crowd meant to pump up his civil-rights movement authenticity and his Kennedy Camelot image, Barack Obama claimed that the Kennedy administration paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and therefore was responsible for his “very existence”. However, the first march on Selma took place on March 7, 1965. Obama would have been about three and half years old at that time. For some reason the media never did the math on this.”
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/20…
Whether the speech writer planned it this way is irrelevant. Accuracy is a key when you talk about where you came from.

Here is a list of inconsistencies on what Obama is on record as saying that pertain to his ability to remain focused and decisive in an executive position:
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/

If you want to discuss this further, I am open to that. Both campaigns do appear to be about smearing lately, so I am not letting anyone off the hook here. I have observed Obama in interviews and before the public, and I have not seen a secure presentation of his ability to lead. When the debates begin, we will see who comes out more sure of themselves. It's one thing to have good intentions, it's a whole other ballgame to be able to follow through with a solid stance.

When Obama talks about his background, he needs to know what he is talking about, rather than saying something off the wall like Kennedy was “responsible for his very existence”. He did say this in a speech to a civil activist group probably because of the selective crowd present:

“In a speech to a Selma, Alabama crowd meant to pump up his civil-rights movement authenticity and his Kennedy Camelot image, Barack Obama claimed that the Kennedy administration paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and therefore was responsible for his “very existence”. However, the first march on Selma took place on March 7, 1965. Obama would have been about three and half years old at that time. For some reason the media never did the math on this.”
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/20…
Whether the speech writer planned it this way is irrelevant. Accuracy is a key when you talk about where you came from.

Here is a list of inconsistencies on what Obama is on record as saying that pertain to his ability to remain focused and decisive in an executive position:
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/

If you want to discuss this further, I am open to that. Both campaigns do appear to be about smearing lately, so I am not letting anyone off the hook here. I have observed Obama in interviews and before the public, and I have not seen a secure presentation of his ability to lead. When the debates begin, we will see who comes out more sure of themselves. It's one thing to have good intentions, it's a whole other ballgame to be able to follow through with a solid stance.