An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Straight Talk Express No More

A strange and sad thing is happening in America.

The more half-truths, untruths, fabrications, and misrepresentations—whatever you may want to call them—the McCain-Palin team tells, the more the Republican base is energized. In addition, the more the same old lies are repeated, verbatim, the wilder and louder the crowds cheer.

For example, as of yesterday, Sarah Palin had repeated with relish the same widely discredited half-truth about the “Bridge to Nowhere” seven or eight times: “I told Congress: ‘Thanks but no thanks for that Bridge to Nowhere up in Alaska. If we wanted a bridge, we’ll build it ourselves.” And the crowds cheer and whoop every time!

The same is the case with Palin’s disingenuous claim that she auctioned Alaska’s plane on e-Bay. Leave it to John McCain to take this half-truth and turn it into a full-blown lie by gleefully claiming, “You know what I enjoyed the most? She took the luxury jet that was acquired by her predecessor and sold it on eBay — and made a profit!” And the crowds cried and whooped it up.

And the beat, and the list, goes on. And the crowds lap it up and clap even more.

And the more frequently and jubilantly these untruths are repeated, the more jubilantly the crowds react to them, and believe them to be facts.

That is what the title of a story in this morning’s Washington Post alludes to: “As Campaign Heats Up, Untruths Can Become Facts Before They’re Undone,” and provides more examples of such untruths and of how they may be beginning to “stick” because they are repeated so often—with impunity and without shame.

The Post says, “Nevertheless, with McCain’s standing in the polls surging, aides say he is not about to back down from statements he believes are fundamentally true, such as the anecdote about the bridge.”

And that is what is so sad, as long as the crowds keep cheering and the polls keep surging, why would the McCain-Palin team want to get back on board the “Straight Talk Express.” They might as well keep sprinting and telling half-truths all the way to the White House, always surrounded by those adoring, wildly cheering crowds.

  • Mike_P
    “Nevertheless, with McCain’s standing in the polls surging, aides say he is not about to back down from statements he believes are fundamentally true, such as the anecdote about the bridge.”

    It's the fact that he knows that the statements are fundamentally *untrue,* yet keeps repeating them, that offers us a a clear window into his self-proclaimed deep sense of honor. It's increasingly obvious that deep sense of honor is no deeper than Narcissus' pool of water.
  • elrod
    A) I don't think McCain is surging much anymore. He got a nice convention bounce and a Palin novelty bounce. But according to Rasmussen the bounce has largely dissipated. Who knows when Gallup will show the same but it probably will soon.

    B) The continual lying about the Bridge is becoming a major issue in itself. Obama hit them hard on it and that's when McCain played the sexism card. They know they're BSing but they'll play it as long as their mindless followers go along.
  • What's the new name for the Straight Talk Express? The Lying Bulls**t Express? The Fully Fiction Express?
  • JSpencer
    Dorain, this active and willful embrace of lies as a campaign device is more than just sad. It's dangerous - especially when a partisan base laps it up like mana from heaven. What will the strategy become in October, 2012 and 2016? Our country is in serious danger from within if it has decided to knowingly accept lying as a campaign practice. It's bad enough to see the politics of fear and distraction, now it's morphing into the politics of deceit as well. People had better wake up.
  • jchem
    Elrod,

    This from NPR regarding point A:

    “Given these attitudinal shifts, the question you want to ask is not why McCain has gained so much in the polls against his Democratic rival but why he has not gained even more. Indeed, it is entirely possible that his surge has only begun.”

    http://www.npr.org/watchingwashington/index.html

    I will agree that if those two (McCain/Palin) don't stop talking about that bridge, that momentum could and should come to a complete stop. The more this keeps going on with them, the more they have got to be scaring people away; It certainly is me. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening if this from the WSJ is any indication:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122100927525717...
  • jthawk
    My British husband asked me last night, "Are Americans really that stupid?" I'm so sad to say that we indeed seem to be THAT stupid for believing obvious lies.
  • JSpencer
    "Are Americans really that stupid?"

    With regard to that question, I submit 2000 and 2004 election results as exhibits A and B. Keep in mind, all it takes is a little more than half the American electorate to push the wrong person into the White House. That leaves quite a few of us who didn't support the scoundrel!
  • Gichin13
    So disappointed in McCain. He utterly debased himself with that commercial claiming that Obama wants sex ed for kindergartners.

    I guess this means that Obama can, with equal credibility, claim that McCain is in support of pedophiles.
  • DLS
    The surge -- the Palin Surge -- ow

    You have to hope for more screwups from the McCain-Palin campaign, as they've stolen the appeal to emotion from Obama (what Obama's campaign has nearly completely been about). In that sense, it's the opposite of a screwup.

    I had to laugh today as I spent one-half hour on the radio switching (typically at the start of commercials) between Thom Hartmann and Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh was really funny at one point when he described what Obama needs to do -- not just lighten up, and take up smoking again to calm down, but he should do a kind of comedy act to get even more on Dem voters' good side. He should have a cigarette in one hand and a drink in the other while he does a lighter shpiel. Biden should be equally entertaining to recapture Dem hearts. Obama can be Sammy Davis Jr., and Biden can be Dean Martin, was how Limbaugh put it. Put the two of them to work at their next appearance together, in some Hollywood nightclub.

    After all, Hollywood is starting to make the same mistakes the media are making, with attacks. Now Matt Damon is on record bashing Palin.

    WARNING:

    It's not just that McCain-Palin has stolen Obama's appeal to emotion; the nature and sources of the attacks on McCain and Palin risk a well-deserved backlash.

    Go, Hollywood, go. Join the media. Just don't be surprised that you're efforts serve to retard, not advance, progress toward an Obama presidency.
  • kritt11
    Why are we surprised? This is what the Republicans do every campaign season. Yes, of course McCain is better than this-- but after his 2000 loss he realized--- he could either become a Democrat or do what others in his party have done to win.

    Since then he tried to mend fences with opposing interests in his party and did what he could to appear as BOTH the straight-talking maverick that attracted moderates and independents, and the conventional pol who yields to the conservative forces in the party in order to win.

    I've seen so many pundits who seem bewildered--- they know John McCain they say and this is not the real John McCain. Many of those who knew Bush as a popular, moderate bipartisan governor in Texas said they no longer knew him after he chose Cheney as VP and chose a more rancorous partisan personna up here in DC. Both men made a deal with the devil--- to win at any cost--- so now appearances and spin trump integrity and truth.
  • casualobserver
    “We must be clear with the American people that we are committing to Iraq for the long haul; not just the day after, but the decade after.”

    Integrity and truth, huh?
  • kritt11
    CO- Of course its too much for you to comment on the incident at hand and admit how dishonestly its being handled by the McCain camp isnt it??
  • JSpencer
    Sarah Palin has an interview tomorrow. How is she going to respond to questions about these "inconsistencies"? How will she spin her original support for the bridge to nowhere after the many times she has claimed to say, "thanks but no thanks" to it? Do they honestly think that question isn't going to come up? I have to believe these lies willl become a problem for team McCain - and soon. I reject the idea that all those undecideds and independents are going to appreciate being lied to. In otherwords, we have not sunk so far as a country that lies are yet seen as standard operating procedure.
  • casualobserver
    kritt....when this blog gives up its nauseating fixation on drilling through six feet of bedrock to cobble together a nefarious spin to every sentence Sarah Palin has ever uttered in the course of her life and campaign and won't even contemplate disturbing the topsoil of Obama's utterances, I will return to my true roots of being an agreeable Ayn Rand libertarian. Until then, it is full metal jacket time.

    For example, in the entirety of this pig with lipstick harangue, I would have acknowledged the context rejoinder as reasonable evidence he probably was not making the personal attack, but the continued abject denial by the left that it certainly wasn't politically skillful of him to make reference to the word lipstick now that it has become so famously attached to Palin means that there is absolutely no reason to attempt to be reasonable on this blog.
  • Don Quijote
    I reject the idea that all those undecideds and independents are going to appreciate being lied to. In otherwords, we have not sunk so far as a country that lies are yet seen as standard operating procedure.


    Dream on...

    Snopes - John Kerry's Service Medals
    Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
    FactCheck - Republican-funded Group Attacks Kerrys War Record

    Need anyone say more?
  • Don Quijote
    With regard to that question, I submit 2000 and 2004 election results as exhibits A and B. Keep in mind, all it takes is a little more than half the American electorate to push the wrong person into the White House. That leaves quite a few of us who didn't support the scoundrel!


    And that would not be a major problem if the Democrats had a spine.
  • Half_Past_Midnight
    I reject the idea that all those undecideds and independents are going to appreciate being lied to. In otherwords, we have not sunk so far as a country that lies are yet seen as standard operating procedure.


    You are right to believe so. With this election, however, it has become a matter of which candidate's lies are worse.
  • JSpencer
    CO, maybe you can find a moment in your "full metal jacket time'" to note that McCain and Cheney have both made use of the lipstick-pig phrase before. Obama has also used it on occasion BEFORE Palin was a name most in the lower 48 had ever heard of. So maybe it won't be necessary for you to entirely dispense with reason on "this blog" afterall. ;-)
  • Don Quijote
    Half_Past_Midnight,

    Please list the Obama Lies.
  • RevDave
    The facts are clear: John McCain is a serial liar. Either he knows these are lies and keeps repeating them, or he chooses to ignore the facts and really, really believes these are true - which one is better for America? Answer: neither
  • kritt11
    CO- So if lies, half-truths and innuendo work it is ok to use it? On the grounds that your opponent is less than skillful?
  • kritt11
    CO- I have only criticized Palin for what she has actually done, and posted a list of rumors about her that were debunked by Newsweek. But if she supported the Bridge to Nowhere before the scandal hit and then spun around to change her position afterwards (while keeping the money) I can't condone her "thanks but no thanks" lies now.
  • Half_Past_Midnight
    Don Quijote~

    When Obama talks about his background, he needs to know what he is talking about, rather than saying something off the wall like Kennedy was "responsible for his very existence". He did say this in a speech to a civil activist group probably because of the selective crowd present:

    "In a speech to a Selma, Alabama crowd meant to pump up his civil-rights movement authenticity and his Kennedy Camelot image, Barack Obama claimed that the Kennedy administration paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and therefore was responsible for his “very existence”. However, the first march on Selma took place on March 7, 1965. Obama would have been about three and half years old at that time. For some reason the media never did the math on this."
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/20...
    Whether the speech writer planned it this way is irrelevant. Accuracy is a key when you talk about where you came from.

    Here is a list of inconsistencies on what Obama is on record as saying that pertain to his ability to remain focused and decisive in an executive position:
    http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/

    If you want to discuss this further, I am open to that. Both campaigns do appear to be about smearing lately, so I am not letting anyone off the hook here. I have observed Obama in interviews and before the public, and I have not seen a secure presentation of his ability to lead. When the debates begin, we will see who comes out more sure of themselves. It's one thing to have good intentions, it's a whole other ballgame to be able to follow through with a solid stance.
  • Half_Past_Midnight
    Also, DQ, here is the 2004 link where Obama has just been elected to the senate, and his reasons for not running for President. His demeanor has not changed one iota since that day:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj6syUD1I4U
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC