I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.

I guess thinking about it there is a sad irony there. McCain won't support equal pay for women, yet he is now a voice of what is sexist and what isn't. Laughable indeed.

intoxination,

I don't think that's an accurate reflection of John McCain's position. He has never stated that he “does not support equal pay for women.” He has, on the other hand, opposed legislation mandating that employers pay male and female employees the same amount. There is a difference, you know. One can support something in principle without demanding that the Federal Government pass a law mandating such a principle.

For example, I believe that motorists should wear seat belts. I believe this because there is abundant evidence that shows that that seat belts have saved countless lives. However, I do not believe the government should have the power to mandate that people wear seat belts and punish those who disobey.

From a Constitutional perspective, I think McCain has more than ample defense in support of his position. I'm certainly not aware of any clause in the Constitution that states that the Federal Government has the power to dictate what an employer pays his/her employees.

Having said that, getting back to the topic at hand, I think the McCain campaign's attempt to turn Obama's “lipstick” comment into a sexist comment is pretty desperate…and pretty pathetic.