An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Kidnapping Mahmoud

An Israeli cabinet minister (and former Mossad agent) has floated the possibility of kidnapping Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and bringing him to trial for war crimes in The Hague. “[A]ll options are open in terms of how he should be brought,” said Rafi Eitan, who, while with Mossad, helped kidnap Adolf Eichmann.

Ahmadinejad has made threats against Israel, but he hasn’t exactly committed war crimes. He’s no Eichmann. What’s more, unlike Eichmann, he is the (democratic) leader of a sovereign state. As much as we may not like him — and I don’t — I’m not so sure kidnapping democratic leaders of sovereign states is such a great idea, and the kidnapping of Ahmadinejad would set an awfully dangerous precedent.

It should go without saying that there are much better ways of dealing with Iran and its seemingly crazy leader — who, however, seems to say incendiary things more for rabble-rousing domestic consumption than for the rest of the world as statements of official Iranian policy — but unfortunately there are people like Eitan who are all-too-serious about pursuing “all options,” no matter the costs and consequences.

  • Holly_in_Cincinnati
    It's a terrible idea and Eitan should not have floated it. Why drum up sympathy for Ahmadinejad?
  • jchem
    I agree. This is a pretty stupid thing to say given how tense the world seems to be. On the surface, it seems to me nothing more than a peeing contest. Mahmoud goes out there and says he wants to wipe Israel of the map. Now Eitan says he wants to kidnap Iran's leader. Do either of them have real ambitions to do either?
  • RememberNovember
    Is kidnapping a leader of a country for alleged war crimes, a war crime in and of itself?
    Sounds like blowhard rhetoric to me.
  • DLS
    It figures Stickings would take the side of the terrorists. By his warped logic he'd also defend Eichmann.

    It's also laughable that he disparages the concept of international law when there are valid claims that happen to be Politically Incorrect.

    [yawn]
  • DLS
    From the saner people:

    "It's a terrible idea [...] a pretty stupid thing [...] blowhard "

    Well, we've heard the opposite when the _objects_ based on the most ridiculous and pathological "reasoning" are the USA or Israel rather than Iran's terrorist government.

    But consistency is sadly lacking here. The inconsistency, hypocrisy, and PC nonsense dwarf the serious questions about extra-national jurisdiction (the Hague, even UN enforcement), the serious issue here.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC