An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Palin’s Sports Complex Boondoggle – Conservative Leadership?

Sarah Palin cites not only her 18 months as Governor of Alaska to defend her conservative, reformist record, but also her 6-year stint as Mayor of Wasilla.

According to the Wall Street Journal, however, her signature accomplishment as Mayor was not exactly an example of conservative leadership or executive competence.

Under her guidance the city pushed for an expensive indoor sports complex to be paid for by city taxpayers and financed through bonds. After much local discussion of the complex, it passed a citywide referendum by 306-286. Yes, that was the TOTAL vote in the referendum, suggesting just how small the electorate is in Wasilla and how small the budget was for the city. This was a big deal, even if a tiny fraction of the city’s 8,000 residents bothered to vote on the complex financing plan.

Anyway, it turned out that the city did not have proper title to the land on which the complex was to be built, and was taken to court. There was a three-way dispute between the City, the Nature Conservancy (which owned the land) and a Fairbanks developer. The City had to pay out $1.3 million in extra litigation costs as a result of the dispute, and the city is still dealing with the large debt incurred in the deal.

I have some sympathy for Palin here. In my home town of Maryville, Tennessee we had a similar sort of dispute over a new Civic Arts Center. It was to be jointly funded by the City of Maryville, the City of Alcoa (next door), Blount County, the State of Tennessee, the Federal government and Maryville College. Remaining financing was to come through private donations. In the middle of community discussion over the Center, Blount County pulled out of the funding arrangement due to protest from some voters that the project was an “elitist boondoggle.” The project is still going forward (it sits in front of my office), though is somewhat scaled down without the Blount County money.

This was a project that both Democrats and Republicans supported, though some in both parties opposed it as wasteful. While this county is dominated by the Republican Party, it is a fairly mainstream business-oriented party and not an ideologically libertarian or social conservative party. Lamar Alexander, a real gentleman and a common-sense moderate conservative, is actually from our town and he exemplifies much of the GOP here. Nevertheless, as many conservative activists pointed out, this project was NOT an example of conservative behavior at work. I’m not a conservative and I’m glad the Arts Center is being built. I think it will do great things for this community, which is already growing quite fast. And while there were minor delays in construction, the project is taking off without a hitch. But I certainly see that a true small-government conservative would never support such a project.

I see the Wasilla sports complex as a similar sort of project. I generally love these sorts of major civic projects. Yeah, they’re expensive. But they are great places for the entire community to come together.

But they are hardly the stuff of small-government conservatism. And more importantly, they better be executed right. In our case, the Arts Center could have been completely derailed when the County pulled out. But creative leadership from the project directors allowed the Center to go on with relatively little changes (a somewhat smaller auditorium). It’s almost impossible to imagine the city failing to secure a title over the land; it would be a massive scandal.

And yet, that seems to be what happened in Wasilla. In the signature accomplishment of Mayor Palin’s tenure, she botched the purchase of land for a major sports complex. Her loyalists on the council there say “litigation happens.”

Is that the kind of executive leadership we could expect from Palin in Washington? Is she going to botch a similarly gigantic project and say, “stuff happens?”

Normally, these kinds of things wouldn’t be so important. But she’s holding up her executive leadership as an example of what she’ll bring to Washington.
How that impressed McCain is beyond me…unless he didn’t bother to check.

  • Rudi
    It's not like the Barracuda, or the RNC, would do anything illegal or without permission. Seems the Wilson sisters weren't happy with Palin and the RNC.
    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/05...
    Heart condemns McCain-Palin use of 'Barracuda'
    Posted: 08:41 AM ET
    Ann and Nancy Wilson of Heart.
    Ann and Nancy Wilson of Heart.

    ST. PAUL, Minnesota (CNN) — Blasting through the Republican convention hall is the 1977 hit "Barracuda" by rock band Heart.

    It's a shout-out to Sarah Palin. When she played basketball in high school, the soon-to-be Republican vice presidential nominee earned the nickname "Sarah barracuda" for her fierce competitiveness.
    ...
    UPDATE: Ann and Nancy Wilson of Heart said Thursday night that Universal Music Publishing and Sony BMG have sent a cease and desist notice to the McCain-Palin campaign over their use of 'Barracuda.'

    "We have asked the Republican campaign publicly not to use our music. We
    hope our wishes will be honored," the group said in a statement that said they "condemn" the use of the song at the Republican convention.

    A KOSsak diarist has a more damning statement from the Wilsons.
    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/5/8102...
    Ann and Nancy have released the following statement:

    "Sarah Palin's views and values in NO WAY represent us as American women. We ask that our song 'Barracuda' no longer be used to promote her image. The song 'Barracuda' was written in the late 70s as a scathing rant against the soulless, corporate nature of the music business, particularly for women. (The 'barracuda' represented the business.) While Heart did not and would not authorize the use of their song at the RNC, there's irony in Republican strategists' choice to make use of it there."

    What would happen if Obama used a Nuggent or Big and Rich...
  • Leonidas
    A valid criticism for once,

    BTW anyone seen what Grove Parc is like these days after Obama's was their representative for 8 years?

    http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=pYMVHwmPQSM

    http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008...

    <snip>

    But a Globe review found that thousands of apartments across Chicago that had been built with local, state, and federal subsidies - including several hundred in Obama's former district - deteriorated so completely that they were no longer habitable.

    Grove Parc and several other prominent failures were developed and managed by Obama's close friends and political supporters. Those people profited from the subsidies even as many of Obama's constituents suffered. Tenants lost their homes; surrounding neighborhoods were blighted.

    Some of the residents of Grove Parc say they are angry that Obama did not notice their plight. The development straddles the boundary of Obama's state Senate district. Many of the tenants have been his constituents for more than a decade.

    "No one should have to live like this, and no one did anything about it," said Cynthia Ashley, who has lived at Grove Parc since 1994.
  • elrod
    Leonidas,
    No doubt many of these public-private partnership housing developments are in shambles. But look what they are replacing: the infamous Robert Taylor Homes and Cabrini-Green. I think it's entirely fair to push Obama on this, though I don't think there's anything he can actually do about it. One of the most visible changes in Chicago the last few years is the disappearance of large-scale public housing complexes. Lots of people wonder where the former tenants went. It's hardly surprising that they've gone off and been exploited elsewhere.
  • AustinRoth
    I agree in part with Leo (a valid, and fair-minded) article, and disagree with the need to try and counterbalance.

    The only point I would quibble with is whether it was a 'boondoggle'. An indoor sports complex in Alaska seems like the ONLY type I would think would be worth building up there, given the weather.
  • elrod
    AR,
    Like I said, I would totally support building a sports complex. I'm a sucker for these big public projects. I even support taxpayer-funded stadiums for sports teams.

    The problem is that they screwed it up and failed to secure title to the property before going ahead with road construction. As a result she put the city in more debt. It was just incompetence.

    Again, this is small town stuff, and foolish administrators make these kinds of mistakes all the time. But not very often do these foolish administrators get plucked for the VP. That's why these decisions deserve attention.
  • AustinRoth
    Fine, then call it that - incompetence or mismanagement.

    But you choose to use the word 'boondoggle' in your title, which means "a project funded by the federal government out of political favoritism that is of no real value to the community or the nation."

    As I said, I objected to the use of the word 'boondoggle', because I don't think it fits that definition. Words have meanings.
  • Silhouette
    All politicians do illegal stuff.

    To set the Obama campaign apart dems need to quickly shift the tabloid focus to substantive ones.

    It is the area where the GOP is weakest. Playing into the tabloid game is a strategy the GOP is hoping for..and part of the reason they picked this candidate...to divert attention from issues they are weakest on. The more you attack Palin, the more you popularize her. The more you attack her, the more you risk alienating significant numbers of angry women who know their candidate Hillary was passed over for a less-qualified man. The GOP is tapping that anger, tapping that popularity boost. And in the end, in the Fall, behind the curtains, that anger will be expressed. That popularity will sway just enough voters to tip the scales pro-GOP.

    Quit it already!

    Palin will be protected, she is teflon. You'd best invest your time attacking an illegal war in Iraq, specifics in economic reform, job-creation, alternative energy, healthcare etc. The GOP has no tangible remedies for any of these major concerns of voters. In fact, several of them they are pitching to exacerbate, instead of remedy, with typical republican nonsensical "trickle-down" policies.

    Again, the weakness, the spot of blood, the achilles heel of the GOP is NOT SARAH PALIN. It is the issues, any of them. Just pick one. Their 8-year track record and their lack of concrete plans that the voters will buy is the rice paper shack that they live in while diverting you to continually ram your head against the reinforced concrete bunker that is Sarah Palin..

    I offered to focus on BigOil because it is the root of the foul dandelion that chokes our American vitality. Eliminate that monopoly and institute alternatives, then watch the jobs bloom, the economy follow suit, our money stay home instead of going to the Middle East or more fat cats in Texas...then with the new stimulus, implement affordable government regulated health care.

    They stepped in for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The GOP cannot whine when subsidized health care is proposed. Call them on their hypocrisy. Call them on their slop. Call them on their corporate pandering. Tell them to shove their cries of "socialist-liberal-left" up their kiesters.
  • CAbear
    I agree, its the failing to aquire the title to the land that is the real negative issue here. Although, I believe that the majority of the money that was to be used to build the complex came from a Ted Stevens earmark...
    As a point of comparison, if the amount of debt that Sarah Palin left in Wasilla (population 5000 at the time) was for the entire US it would be 1.3 trillion.
  • Silhouette
    And compare that to Obama's financial issues in Chicago, and his relationship with the slum-lord and you have what we call "an even slate".

    Match for match you will find this in the Palin attacks. And the net result is, more popularity for Palin, less for Obama. More anger stirred in seeing yet another woman raked over the coals while Obama's identical sins remain buried...

    You're just not getting it...

    Though admittedly there just might be GOP moles on websites like this wholly dedicated to keeping the fires lit under dead-end issues and wet blankets on the areas that the GOP are most vulnerable..

    Ya think?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC