<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain&#8217;s Next Task: Win Undecideds And Moderates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/22471/mccains-next-task-win-undecideds-and-moderates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22471/mccains-next-task-win-undecideds-and-moderates/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:16:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jwest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22471/mccains-next-task-win-undecideds-and-moderates/comment-page-1/#comment-133594</link>
		<dc:creator>jwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/independent-voters/independents/22471/mccains-next-task-win-undecideds-and-moderates/#comment-133594</guid>
		<description>Jacobs ignores the past presidential elections and reaches back to pre-Palin voter enthusiasm statistics to extrapolate the needed independents and democrats the republicans need to win.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And who believes this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess it’s becoming easier and easier to be published if you just advocate the right conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacobs ignores the past presidential elections and reaches back to pre-Palin voter enthusiasm statistics to extrapolate the needed independents and democrats the republicans need to win.</p>
<p>And who believes this?</p>
<p>I guess it’s becoming easier and easier to be published if you just advocate the right conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
