An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Sarah Palin Cone of Silence

01aaamccain_palin.jpgRumors are slowly crystallizing into confirmed reports when it comes to the dating phase of America’s relationship with Sarah Palin. Following our brief introductions, this particular shiddach will apparently be overseen by Team McCain adhering to ancient traditions – there will be no future dates without strict chaperones in attendance and the conversations will be passed through the mothers. Should we wish to know anything further about the Alaska Governor, the campaign team will define what it is we should know and when we will find out about it.

According to Nicole Wallace of the McCain campaign, the American people don’t care whether Sarah Palin can answer specific questions about foreign and domestic policy. According to Wallace — in an appearance I did with her this morning on Joe Scarborough’s show — the American people will learn all they need to know (and all they deserve to know) from Palin’s scripted speeches and choreographed appearances on the campaign trail and in campaign ads.

No unscripted questions. No one-on-one interviews. Rick Davis was being interviewed on Morning Joe this morning and was asked, “Can you really afford not to have her do these interviews?” His response? “We can afford to do anything we want to.”

Can they really get away with this? A decade ago, when I was more of an optimist and perhaps a tad less cynical, I would have said absolutely not. This should pretty much end the chances of any campaign. But today I feel a bit older, wiser and more jaded. The two parties still hold the rights to the only game in town, and there is virtually nothing they might not attempt and perhaps even prevail with. But what is it that could drive such a drastic decision?

Are they perhaps worried that George Stephanopoulos might ask her some specific questions about her political history which the team is simply not prepared to have her answer? What if they ask questions about a city librarian whom then Mayor Palin attempted to fire because she wouldn’t remove certain objectionable books from the shelves? (She later back-pedaled and claimed it wasn’t a “serious proposal.”) Might the host pick at the scabs of speeches she made giving full throated support for the “Bridge to Nowhere” before later retreating from that position and claiming that opposition as a badge of honor during her first speech to us? Will reporters question this “fiscal conservative” about the hamlet of Wasilla which had zero fiscal debt when she arrived, but was more than $20M in debt when she departed? (Most of this was spent on a “sports complex” which later turned into a financial boondoggle and was prioritized in a town which lacked a sewage treatment plant.) Will her long reach for generous helpings of pork be brought up, even after her claims to oppose it? Of course, all such questions would likely be lumped into a category of “unfair attacks on her family.”

Or are her handlers worried that the conversation might turn to international affairs? What if she were asked her opinion of Mikheil Saakashvili and his handling of relations with his neighbors? Do they fear she might be caught with a “deer in the headlights” frozen stare at the camera? Will she be able to pronounce the name of the puppet leader of Iran? (To this day I still think of him as “President I’m a dinner jacket” so I can relate to that one.)

I’ll slip on my prognosticator’s hat for a moment and give you a prediction. Sarah Palin will eventually show up for such questioning, but she’s going to look much more tired and haggard. It won’t be from the rigors of the campaign trail, though. Word will leak out from the McCain campaign that Palin is spending 14 hour sessions with a series of wonks drilling her on matters around the globe like a high school student cramming the week before the S.A.T exams. This is a challenging task because it’s a big world and there’s a lot of material to cover. And even if she doesn’t show up to talk to reporters, they will still need to get her ready for her debate with Joe Biden. That’s one date which the parents won’t be able to cancel and no chaperones will be allowed on the stage.

  • Among the many questions I would like to have answered by both Sarah Palin and Joe Biden, chief amongst those is, "What do you want to achieve as Vice President?" Second on that list is, "Have you discussed with <running partner> what your duties will be?"

    Keep in mind, I understand that there are constitutional roles for the Vice President. I'm not talking about those duties, but rather the extended roles that each President has decided to grant their VP.
  • shaun
    A modest prediction: Palin will be forced out of the cone of silence as the questions about her pile up. Her failure to answer even the simplest questions will be manna for the loquacious Obama and Biden.
  • Marlowecan
    One could replace "Sarah Palin" with "Barack Obama" and this post by Jazz would be almost as accurate.

    It was Obama, of famous memory, who when pressed by several reporters about Rezko (reporters from Chicago...the MSM being totally in the Obama tank at the time) pleaded: "Come on guys, I've answered eight questions already" before being whisked off by handlers.

    "Are they perhaps worried that George Stephanopoulos might ask her some specific questions about her political history which the team is simply not prepared to have her answer?"

    Hmmm...I also recall how Stephanopoulos was damned across the blogosphere for asking questions of Obama which Obama supporters considered outrageous.

    A "Cone of Silence" is nothing new for a political candidate.
    McCain is now in total lockdown; in sharp contrast to his Straight Talk Express. Kerry was derided as "Bubble Boy". Most of Obama's primary performances were in scripted performances where his oratory shone, but no questions were permitted.

    Why shouldn't the McCain team protect Palin?
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Why shouldn't the McCain team protect Palin?


    She compared herself to a pitbull at the Republican convention.

    But it turns out she's just a poodle.
  • Rudi
    Hmmm...I also recall how Stephanopoulos was damned across the blogosphere for asking questions of Obama which Obama supporters considered outrageous.
    But Obama did answer the questions, Palin is going into hiding with an occasional lovefest with Hannity. Let her copy the Cheeney model, with out the extensive experience(bad) of Chenney.
  • jchem
    "Why shouldn't the McCain team protect Palin?"

    I don't think its a matter of "protecting" her. I think they should let her off the leash and do what VP candidates are supposed to. She has shown herself quite capable of tossing out the red meat. By not going out there unscripted, she gives me (and I assume many others) the impression that she is either hiding something or just avoiding having to answer difficult questions. Put her on O'Reilly for all I care; if Obama can go there, surely so can she. Besides, how are the Repubs going to protect her when she steps in the ring with Biden?
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Besides, how are the Repubs going to protect her when she steps in the ring with Biden?


    Option A) Oh, that awful Joe Biden was a meanie to our nice Sarah Pallin!

    Option B) I don't care what anybody says, she just kicked his ass!!!1!!!!!
  • Marlowecan,
    You do realize that O'Reilly recently interviewed Obama and started airing portions of that interview last night?
  • Marlowecan
    ChrisWWW...you are quite right.

    Obama has developed impressively in terms of his interview abilities.

    In fact, one wonders why his team sheltered him the way they did. Look at Obama's performance when he finally sat down with Chicago newspapers - after avoiding their questions about Rezko for months - Obama knocked it out of the ballpark.

    Personally, I doubt Palin has anywhere near Obama's abilities or intelligence in this regard.

    But . . . Obama was sheltered from the press corps.
    McCain is even more sheltered now than Obama ever was (and, for some reason, seems to be getting away with this . . . while Palin is being criticized for being in a bubble).

    I vaguely recall Dan Quayle being a bubble as well. It is nothing new for campaigns to shelter candidates when they feel there might be a weakness.

    jchem said: "By not going out there unscripted, she gives me (and I assume many others) the impression that she is either hiding something or just avoiding having to answer difficult questions."

    This was precisely the Clinton attack line against Obama.

    For the reasons you note, I believe Obama's team adopted the wrong strategy in avoiding reporters during the primary . . .after all, Obama has since shown his true metal repeatedly in this campaign when he confronted tough questioning (he only seemed off-balance in the last debate with Clinton, under that withering barrage - but he held his own, as one must admit). . . and Obama has shown his strength.

    It may also be the wrong strategy with Palin. . .she has to learn to walk the walk sometime. But it is not unusual for this to happen. Nor even surprising.
  • Marlowe,
    I would add, that it would be a big plus for the GOP if they had video of interviewers actually verbally abusing Palin. It would lend some reality to their complaints about the media.
  • CStanley
    I wouldn't doubt that this is another wily strategy, to hint at a protective shield around Palin (even though all that's really been said is that there's going to be an element of cutting through the media BS and talking directly to the American people) and giving her critics enough rope to hang themselves.

    If I'm right, this is brilliant- they get to stall a bit in rolling her out, so that she can be briefed and brought up to speed on policy- and then after critics are worked up into a lather they bring her onto the interview circuit and everyone who was screaming about the 'bubble' begins to look like they were grasping at straws yet again in attempts to deflate Palin's image.
  • CStanley,
    It might be brilliant, but as someone concerned with Palin's qualifications, it's not exactly comforting.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    So, CStanley, you're saying the poodle's not trained yet? ; )
  • jchem
    "they get to stall a bit in rolling her out, so that she can be briefed and brought up to speed on policy"

    Shouldn't this have been done already CStanley? One of Hillary's arguments against Obama was that he would have to learn while on the job (Biden said the same). I would agree with Marlowe that as soon as Obama went out there and started talking he did extremely well. Maybe Palin could go out their and do the same? It's just a guess, but it seems to me that it would be worth trying.
  • Marlowecan
    Chris said: "I would add, that it would be a big plus for the GOP if they had video of interviewers actually verbally abusing Palin. It would lend some reality to their complaints about the media."

    True. Nothing arouses the GOP like the press being meanies (yes, Dems get upset at this too...but Republicans have Anti-Media chromosones in their DNA).

    I think CStanley predicts this right: They will get Palin up to speed with briefing book after briefing book. Then she will smoke in the interviews (only without the "Uhm" of thought that Obama tends to show).

    Chris, you are hardly alone in not being comfortable about Palin's qualifications . . . but if she can memorize enough data fast enough, she might pull it off.

    Then the media will be happy. They will have a new narrative.

    Then, in a few years, President Palin and her briefing books will be in the Oval Office.
  • So here's my working hypothesis. She's a pretty face and good at delivering a speech written by Bush speech writers. She will be "acting VP." She's just an actress playing the part, and so can't be expected to do interviews in character. OK Sarah. Prove me wrong. Or not. Right now, she appears to need the likes of Rick Davis to protect her from explaining herself. That is weakness.
  • GreenDreams,
    Let me recast something I said about McCain this weekend...
    "If Sarah Palin can't face Larry King, how is she going to face Bin Laden?"
  • Rambie
    GreenDreams, I don't think Palin is just "an actress" I think they're prepping her to run in 2012. NPR was interviewing a GOP strategist yesterday, while I was driving home from work, who pretty much said just that. Also, he was hoping that Palin would pull a McCain presidency back toward the right.
  • CStanley
    I think CStanley predicts this right: They will get Palin up to speed with briefing book after briefing book. Then she will smoke in the interviews (only without the "Uhm" of thought that Obama tends to show).

    Exactly. And from what I've seen of her so far, she's a terrific debater. Even when she flubs an answer a bit, she bounces back up quicker than Misty May and Kerri Walsh in a beach volleyball tournament.

    Chris: if she's as sharp as she seems, I don't care all that much whether she's learned things recently or in the past. I'll reserve final judgement, because I really don't know if she'll be able to get up to speed or not- but generally I'm not convinced that a lot of the guys who've been around a long time are any more knowledgeable than a newbie could be in a fairly short time, if he/she is a quick study.
  • CStanley,
    I just don't get how you can support the pick in the present.

    Palin may be okay. She may have great policy proposals. She may be more intellectually curious than she seems. But there is little evidence of that now, otherwise the McCain camp would have told us about it. And again, that brings up the big point, that McCain didn't know these things either, and he picked her anyways.
  • CStanley
    I guess honestly, I don't vote for the bottom of the ticket- unless I'm concerned that they're completely incompetent, then the person at the top of the ticket is my main concern. I know people will say that it should be higher priority due to McCain's age, but from what I see of him he's just as healthy as people who are 20 years younger and if I were an actuary I'd look at his 96 year old mom springing up from her seat and think, "he's probably got at least another 20 good years on him."
  • CStanley,
    I hope you won't accuse liberals of being starry-eyed idealists :-)
  • CStanley
    Hey, no one is rational 100% of the time...

    And from where I sit, there's a great leap of faith being taken by those who feel Obama is ready right now. You mention 'intellectual curiosity', a quality that seems to be highly prized by his supporters and I agree that he has that, and intelligence too. Palin may or may not be his equal in that, but those things alone aren't sufficient to be successful in the presidency. She may rank somewhat below him in those qualities, but not necessarily very far below- and then may make up for that with other positive qualities that he may lack.

    I guess to better understand my POV there, it's helpful to know that in my family, my dad was fairly intellectual and my mom has common sense smarts. I've seen the positive and negative sides of both, and I think they complement each other (of course, I'd like to think I inherited a fair amount of both...heh.)

    I think that what I see so far in Palin is that "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" vibe, where the common sense and decency of the common man (woman) can sometimes be preferrable to high intellect.
  • I think that what I see so far in Palin is that "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" vibe, where the common sense and decency of the common man (woman) can sometimes be preferrable to high intellect.

    But you have to admit, even that story is suspect.

    Check out this post from Andrew Sullivan: http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily...
  • CStanley
    Oh, sure, I reserve judgment on all of it. I can't really imagine that there would be anything that would come out that would drive me to vote Obama, but if for some reason I felt that Palin was a complete fraud or dud I'd consider abstention.

    And one result of all of the rumormongering is that it's had a 'boy who cried wolf' effect on me, so that nothing I hear about Palin (or any other candidates) right now is believable until there's incontrovertible evidence.
  • Please see the update near the top of the main TMV page. Apparently the plan is already in effect and the secret "Education of Sarah Palin" is beginning in private.
  • CStanley
    I honestly find nothing unusual about that, Jazz. I imagine that all candidates go through the same thing, and though I'll concede that we're pretty late into the process, in past elections the campaign season didn't get started till around the time of the conventions. It's only now that we expect candidates to be vetted and well versed on every issue two years before the election. Governors in particular are likely to need quite an education on world leaders and other world affairs. I mean c'mon, you have to admit that even if Sarah Palin is already fairly knowledgeable, that someone's going to have a real gotcha moment if they trip her up on who the second in command in Uzbekistan is.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC