An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

‘U.S. Republicans: The Reawakening of Moral Intolerance’ - Le Figaro, France

From what we can gather so far from central Europe, there is little love for Sarah Palin or the McCain campaign’s apparent embrace of the Karl Rove election strategy.

Author, historian and political scientist Nicole Bacharan finds irony in the tactics used by the Republican Party, and fears that the more tolerant America that appeared to be emerging may once again be submerged under the out-sized influence of the Christian right.

Bacharan writes in part:

“Up to now, John McCain, not much liked by his party, was trying to attract independents and moderates. The arrival of Sarah Palin radically alters this pattern: it greatly polarizes the election and has triggered an outbreak of moral intolerance in the campaign.

“There is cause to protest this equation in which a particular group - the Christian right - has a monopoly on morality, while all others are presumed to be living in debauchery. What a paradox for the Republican Party, always hostile to the encroachment of the state, to have become the champion of religious values imposed by public force!”

By Nicole Bacharan

Translated By Sandrine Ageorges

September 2, 2008

France - French - Original Article (French)

Nicole Bacharan, a specialist on American society, a historian and a political scientist, reacts to the decision of John McCain to select Sarah Palin as his running mate on the Republican ticket. She also published this week ‘The Little Book of the American Elections’ and in October, “Black Americans, from the Cotton Fields to the White House.”

In choosing Sarah Palin, Governor of Alaska, as a candidate for the vice-presidency, John McCain has suddenly returned the well-known dispute over moral values to the heart of the election battle, after eight years of the Bush Administration had given way to real priorities (recession, terrorism, two wars and increasing tensions in the world). Up to now, John McCain, not much liked by his party, was trying to attract independents and moderates. The arrival of Sarah Palin radically alters this pattern: it greatly polarizes the electorate and has triggered an outbreak of moral intolerance in the campaign.

Why has John McCain, 72-years-old, designated as his successor in the event something should befall him if he were elected, this new comer who has little domestic policy experience and none in terms of international policy? Of course, Sarah Palin is a woman (thumb to Hillary Clinton’s nose), young (thumb to Obama’s nose), who can bring modernity and glamour to the Republican ticket. Most important for McCain is that Sarah Palin is an ultra-conservative Christian, a supporter of teaching “creationism” (which refutes the theory of evolution), a fierce anti-abortion activist; and supporter of programs that exclusively promote abstinence among adolescents and ignores contraception (a hypocrisy that her daughter is now a primary victim of). The role of this Lady of Ice is clear: to win the ultra Christian right for John McCain, which up to now has tended to shun him.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated and English-language foreign press coverage of the U.S. election.

  • vwcat
    However, judging from reports Today is that she has chased the fence sitters to Obama. So McCain is losing his original support base and losing the needed indies.
  • DLS
    Fools. Hyping, overreacting, bigoted fools..."Lady of Ice" [snicker]

    There is no great polarization, just a greater distinction now between McCain-Palin and Obama-Biden.

    The numbers of TV viewers nearly matching Obama's sky-high figures, for someone making her _first_ prime time nation-wide speech of importance, illustrate the breadth of her appeal to so many.

    If McCain and Palin offer _real_ change, reform, in Washington, they should win.
  • Leonidas
    VW Cat

    The reports I've seen suggest otherwise:

    http://www.mediacurves.com./Politics/J6992-Palin/

    Among the study findings:

    After viewing Palin’s speech, a greater number of respondents across all parties believe that selecting Governor Sarah Palin for vice president will help John McCain’s campaign. Republicans were especially positive about the implications of this pick, nearly three-quarters of whom suggest that this nomination will “definitely help” his campaign. After viewing the speech, 70% Republicans say they will “definitely” vote for the McCain/Palin ticket after viewing Palin’s speech.

    There is a positive change in how independents anticipate voting in the Presidential election after viewing Palin’s speech, with a 9% increase among independents indicating that they will probably or definitely vote for the McCain/Palin ticket after watching the speech.

    Palin’s speech proved to be equally effective in swaying votes for both men and women. Among the independents who watched her speech, respondents who report that they will “probably” or “definitely” vote for McCain increased by 10% across both genders, around 38% of female independents and 36% of their male counterparts
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/Enxit Group, LLC