
Well we’ve been wondering if the GOP would match the Democrats in terms of the keynote address, and now the question has been answered with a solid yes.
Rudy Giuliani has fired up the crowd with an energetic and often eloquent address. I am sure that some of our readers did not agree with the sentiments expressed but I don’t think anyone can deny that the speech was a home run in terms of energizing the crowd, more than matching the equally-impressive address last week by Mark Warner.
In a strong 25 minute address he laid out the case for John McCain and offered some fairly sharp criticisms for Senator Obama.
He began by looking back at his own Presidential campaign and commented:
Almost exactly one year ago during a Republican presidential debate in Durham, New Hampshire, I said that if I weren’t running for President myself, I’d be supporting John McCain. Well, I’m not, and I do.
Every four years, we are told that this Presidential election is the most important election of our lifetime. This year – 2008 – IS the most important.
He then launched into the experience issue but did so in an interesting way, asking voters to consider their vote for President as if they were hiring someone for a job (which if you think about it is exactly what we are doing).
You’re hiring someone to do a job – an important job that involves the safety and security of your family. Imagine that you have two job applications in your hand – with the names and party affiliations taken off the top. They’re both good and patriotic men – with very different life experiences that have led them to this moment in history.
You’ve got to make this decision right. Who would you hire?
He then compared the two records, pointing out that Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience and a long record of dedication to his country.
On the one hand, you’ve got a man who has dedicated his life to the service of his country. He’s been tested time and again by crisis. He’s passed every test. Even his adversaries acknowledge that he is a true American hero. He loves America as we all do – but he’s sacrificed for it as few do. As a young man, he joined the military…and being a “Top Gun” kind of guy, he became a fighter pilot. He was on a mission over Hanoi when his plane was shot down.
He discussed the long years that McCain spent in prison camps in Vietnam as well as the incredible suffering he endured before moving on to cite McCain’s years of experience in Congress and his willingness to work across party lines. He compared this with the record of Senator Obama, pointing out his service in the Illinois legislature was largely that of a typical Chicago machine politician. He then cited his record in the Senate, pointing out that (as even some Democrats have admitted) he was basically running for President from the moment he arrived in DC, serving as a ‘celebrity Senator’
On the other hand, you have a resume from a gifted man with an Ivy League education. He worked as a community organizer, and immersed himself in Chicago machine politics. Then he ran for the state legislature – where nearly 130 times he was unable to make a decision yes or no. He simply voted “present.”
As Mayor of New York City, I never got a chance to vote “present.” And you know, when you’re President of the United States, you can’t just vote “present.” You must make decisions.
A few years later, he ran for the U.S. Senate. He won and has spent most of his time as a “celebrity senator.” No leadership or major legislation to speak of. His rise is remarkable in its own right – it’s the kind of thing that could happen only in America. But he’s never run a city, never run a state, never run a business.
He’s never had to lead people in crisis.
This is not a personal attack….it’s a statement of fact – Barack Obama has never led anything.
Taking on the issue of change in this election, Rudy delivered what I suspect will become a theme line of the McCain campaign, pointing out “change” is not a destination … just as “hope” is not a strategy. He continued by citing how Senator McCain’s policies will help to deliver the needed changes while also delivering leadership and experience.
Perhaps recognizing that Iraq remains a major issue, Rudy took things right on by pointing out that while today most people acknowledge that the surge has been helpful in improving the situation in Iraq that it was McCain who helped to push the issue when it was unpopular
Look at just one example in a lifetime of principled stands — John McCain’s support for the troop surge in Iraq. The Democratic Party had given up on Iraq. And I believe, ladies and gentlemen, that when they gave up on Iraq they were giving up on America. The Democratic leader in the Senate said so: “America has lost.”
Well, if America lost, who won? Al Qaida? Bin Laden? In the single biggest policy decision of this election, John McCain got it right and Barack Obama got it wrong.
If Barack Obama had been President, there would have been no troop surge and our troops would have been withdrawn in defeat.
He compared this to Obama who has recently had some difficulties with what even many of his supporters saw as flip-flops on issues like campaign financing and wiretapping. He gave a great line when he suggested that Biden ‘get that VP thing in writing’.
Seeking to re-enforce the image of Obama as not having the proper experience on foreign policy he discussed the situation in Georgia, comparing the responses of Obama and McCain.
Having been to that part of the world many times and having developed a clear worldview over many years, John knew where he stood. Within hours, he established a very strong, informed position that let the world know exactly how he’ll respond as President. At exactly the right time, John McCain said, “We’re all Georgians.”
Obama’s first instinct was to create a moral equivalency – that “both sides” should “show restraint.” The same moral equivalency that he has displayed in discussing the Palestinian Authority and the State of Israel.
Later, after discussing it with his 300 foreign policy advisers, he changed his position and suggested that the “the UN Security Council,” could find a solution. Apparently, none of his 300 advisers told him that Russia has a veto on any UN action. Finally Obama put out a statement that looked …well, it looked a lot like John McCain’s.
He also took time to quote Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton when they called Obama as unqualified to be President, something that I think will be an undercurrent of the campaign even with Biden and Clinton on the ticket.
All things considered it was a good solid rally the troops kind of speech. Obviously I don’t expect Obama supporters to be excited about the content any more than I expected McCain supporters to be excited about speeches last week from Clinton, Warner or Gore.
But it was a well-delivered speech that did what was needed.
It was a very angry speech, reminiscent of 2004. Of course, that year there were about a dozen speeches of this sort.
And he spoke too long so they couldn't run the Palin bio video.
It might have fired up the base. But it meandered too long and blew the transition.
Once again, they have so little to offer (unless you count glittering generalities and endless repitition of the McCain bio) , they concentrate on mischaracterizing their opposition (which Giuliani is good at). It's enough for the whipped into a frenzy crowd but will America buy it?
[...] Rudy Fires Up The Crowd [...]
Well as I said I didn't expect those who support Obama and/or dislike McCain to be inspired by the speech, I said it was well delivered and fired up the crowd as it was supposed to.
Similarly there were well done speeches last week that appealed to pro Obama/anti-McCain people but didn't appeal to those who are inspired this week.
You can approve of the delivery of a speech without approving of the content.
[...] Rudy Fires Up The Crowd [...]
I agree, the speech accomplished it's intended purpose – within the confines of the convention. I'm not sure how well it's going to sell in the real world. No matter how they try and spin it, they are still trying to make a pitch for 4 more years of GOP rule. Does the GOP deserve this – based not on their rhetoric, but on their 8 yr record? I should think the answer to that question would be obvious.
The lefties continue to be desperately “creative” — there was nothing angry or superficial about it.
Huckabee and Guiliani both gave surprisingly _good_ speeches, followed by a splendid performance by Palin. That is the truth, accept and like it or not.
* * *
“Does the GOP deserve this – based not on their rhetoric, but on their 8 yr record?”
McCain-Palin have _never_ represented a continuation, much less a duplication, of the past eight years. 2006 was about dissatisfaction of the GOP, not only the Bush administration, a Congressional GOP acting too much like Dems when it comes to poor, insular behavior and corruption, and McCain-Palin (yes, even with Keating Five baggage) offers Americans a true chance at real reform, the _real_ kind of Change [tm] in Washington we have wanted for ages (along with sound energy and foreign policies, safer and saner than anything offered by the other side!).
With Palin, McCain's campaign for the Presidency may be successful. Perhaps that explains the agitation driving the frequent fiction we're currently seeing on the Left about the GOP's surprisingly _good_ convention speeches.
And yet you never have been able to explain how they would differ. Fancy that.
Of course a McCain/Palin ticket will provide a continuation of the last 8 years. It's what he ran his entire primary campaign on and the videos of him explaining how he's voted with Bush over 90% of the time are rather telling, aren't they? And a careful perusal of Palin's stated policies shows that she's even more like Bush. Heck, she's even more radical on being anti-choice than Bush and has sued the federal government for daring to declare an endangered species endangered.