
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can This Get Any Weirder?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 21:51:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141203</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141203</guid>
		<description>jwest has made my point for me, again. The GOP must trick voters into voting against their interests with emotional issues and &quot;identity politics&quot; rather than relying on the strength or in this case, weakness, of their positions. So, the GOP is praying for &quot;low information voters&quot; to hand them the victory that they can&#039;t earn with their policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jwest has made my point for me, again. The GOP must trick voters into voting against their interests with emotional issues and &#8220;identity politics&#8221; rather than relying on the strength or in this case, weakness, of their positions. So, the GOP is praying for &#8220;low information voters&#8221; to hand them the victory that they can&#39;t earn with their policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricorun</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141198</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricorun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141198</guid>
		<description>jwest, I understand your point about identity politics and low information voters. But the fact is that some issues oriented stuff does filter through -- especially in battleground states. The real question is how it will play. And it&#039;s not just about pro-choice vs pro-life. If you ask me, the big elephant in the room is corruption. Right now the GOP is playing up her maverick status in bucking her own party to clean up the swamp they had up there. And that&#039;s what&#039;s playing best right now. But closer to the election Ted Stevens will be standing trial. And I suspect that will mean her ties to him will become clearer to the average voter. Additionally, the investigation (one of them anyway) is supposed to come out with their findings just days before the election. If that doesn&#039;t go well McCain is in big trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jwest, I understand your point about identity politics and low information voters. But the fact is that some issues oriented stuff does filter through &#8212; especially in battleground states. The real question is how it will play. And it&#39;s not just about pro-choice vs pro-life. If you ask me, the big elephant in the room is corruption. Right now the GOP is playing up her maverick status in bucking her own party to clean up the swamp they had up there. And that&#39;s what&#39;s playing best right now. But closer to the election Ted Stevens will be standing trial. And I suspect that will mean her ties to him will become clearer to the average voter. Additionally, the investigation (one of them anyway) is supposed to come out with their findings just days before the election. If that doesn&#39;t go well McCain is in big trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141195</link>
		<dc:creator>jwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141195</guid>
		<description>Jackie,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact that you read this website places you outside of the group Palin is meant to target.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She will appeal to swing voters who don’t really pay attention to politics.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, for every pro-choice voter there is a pro-lifer canceling them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackie,</p>
<p>The fact that you read this website places you outside of the group Palin is meant to target.</p>
<p>She will appeal to swing voters who don’t really pay attention to politics.  </p>
<p>Of course, for every pro-choice voter there is a pro-lifer canceling them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackie2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141194</link>
		<dc:creator>jackie2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141194</guid>
		<description>jw&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m been a single mother, a working mom, blue collar to boot, for 24 years, and Palin is NOT a woman I identify with at all.  Her values aren&#039;t my values.  Being radically Anti-Choice for ALL Americans is completely opposite of how I raised my children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jw</p>
<p>I&#39;m been a single mother, a working mom, blue collar to boot, for 24 years, and Palin is NOT a woman I identify with at all.  Her values aren&#39;t my values.  Being radically Anti-Choice for ALL Americans is completely opposite of how I raised my children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141189</link>
		<dc:creator>jwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141189</guid>
		<description>Ricorun,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You missed my point about identity politics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It doesn’t matter what her positions are to the group of voters we are talking about.  They wouldn’t know how to interpret the policies nor would they care.  These people don’t pay attention to politics, but they vote in Presidential elections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barak will get basically the entire black vote due to identity politics.  The African American community identifies with Obama.  Guilt-ridden high income liberals will vote for Obama due to identity politics.  They knew Hillary was the more experienced and ready, but they identified with the cause of electing a black candidate to help cleanse their ancestral shame.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Single mothers, working moms, blue collar men and a few other groups will identify with Palin – she is one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricorun,</p>
<p>You missed my point about identity politics.</p>
<p>It doesn’t matter what her positions are to the group of voters we are talking about.  They wouldn’t know how to interpret the policies nor would they care.  These people don’t pay attention to politics, but they vote in Presidential elections.</p>
<p>Barak will get basically the entire black vote due to identity politics.  The African American community identifies with Obama.  Guilt-ridden high income liberals will vote for Obama due to identity politics.  They knew Hillary was the more experienced and ready, but they identified with the cause of electing a black candidate to help cleanse their ancestral shame.</p>
<p>Single mothers, working moms, blue collar men and a few other groups will identify with Palin – she is one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AustinRoth</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141186</link>
		<dc:creator>AustinRoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141186</guid>
		<description>rico - OK, saw your Corsi question this time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree, it is not horribly different, and to McCain&#039;s detriment, he has not addressed it in an honorable way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rico &#8211; OK, saw your Corsi question this time. </p>
<p>I agree, it is not horribly different, and to McCain&#39;s detriment, he has not addressed it in an honorable way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141185</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141185</guid>
		<description>Jim S (and CStanley):  you&#039;re right.  Though my comments are more about Palin being able to balance work and home life, something we all struggle with, especially single parents.  I&#039;ve said enough.  Sorry for my rants.  Once was more than enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim S (and CStanley):  you&#39;re right.  Though my comments are more about Palin being able to balance work and home life, something we all struggle with, especially single parents.  I&#39;ve said enough.  Sorry for my rants.  Once was more than enough.</p>
<p>Thanks-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JillyDybka</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141180</link>
		<dc:creator>JillyDybka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141180</guid>
		<description>Poor women have often worked while raising families -- textile mills in my Appalachian ancestors cases, etc. Working as maids etc. I don&#039;t know why this is such a big freaking deal now that middle-class women have done it in great numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor women have often worked while raising families &#8212; textile mills in my Appalachian ancestors cases, etc. Working as maids etc. I don&#39;t know why this is such a big freaking deal now that middle-class women have done it in great numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricorun</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricorun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141179</guid>
		<description>AR: &lt;i&gt;rico - again, I overestimated your ability to read. I DID answer your &#039;questions&#039; to me, by trying to tell you I MADE UP THE CRACK WHORE STUFF!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I apologize for confusing you with jwest. But now that I have you all worked up, answer the Jerome Corsi question I asked you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AR: <i>rico &#8211; again, I overestimated your ability to read. I DID answer your &#39;questions&#39; to me, by trying to tell you I MADE UP THE CRACK WHORE STUFF!</i></p>
<p>I apologize for confusing you with jwest. But now that I have you all worked up, answer the Jerome Corsi question I asked you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elrod</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141178</link>
		<dc:creator>elrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141178</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t work for Obama. And this post is not presenting anything that isn&#039;t in the public record.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like it or not, the family stuff is part of politics. Its important to respect their privacy. But this could be the First Family and the nation can expect to have a window into it (as they do with the Obamas and Bidens).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t work for Obama. And this post is not presenting anything that isn&#39;t in the public record.  </p>
<p>Like it or not, the family stuff is part of politics. Its important to respect their privacy. But this could be the First Family and the nation can expect to have a window into it (as they do with the Obamas and Bidens).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AustinRoth</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141177</link>
		<dc:creator>AustinRoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141177</guid>
		<description>lurxst - How cynical. And how likely to be true. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hadn&#039;t thought of that perspective, because I haven&#039;t thought of any logical reason she would have been selected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lurxst &#8211; How cynical. And how likely to be true. </p>
<p>I hadn&#39;t thought of that perspective, because I haven&#39;t thought of any logical reason she would have been selected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AustinRoth</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141176</link>
		<dc:creator>AustinRoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141176</guid>
		<description>rico - again, I overestimated your ability to read.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I DID answer your &#039;questions&#039; to me, by trying to tell you I MADE UP THE CRACK WHORE STUFF!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why? I appreciate (now) you trouble understanding that. It was that big word &#039;hyperbole&#039; again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jazz (and others) have been making a big deal that &#039;we have to investigate if Palin is really Trig&#039;s Grandma&#039;, because even though there are pictures of her being pregnant at the time, well, that wasn&#039;t good enough. Sliming her daughter seemed so much more fun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then, when it turns out that Bristol is currently pregnant, and has been for long enough to exclude her (yet again) as the the mother of Trig, then we get an unbelievable accusation that either the new pregnancy is faked, or as i said, the stuffed a new baby inside her to protect her Mom.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the Left is willing to believe that BS, then why shouldn&#039;t I start my own set of completely facetious, implausible, and offensive rumors? I have been waiting for Jazz or one of the other illuminated lights that do the front page postings to run with it. After all, my rumor is as equally soured, and relevant, as all this crap and Palin, Trig and Bristol has been.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you STILL can&#039;t understand what is going on, then there is nothing more I can do to help you overcome your comprehension shortcomings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rico &#8211; again, I overestimated your ability to read.</p>
<p>I DID answer your &#39;questions&#39; to me, by trying to tell you I MADE UP THE CRACK WHORE STUFF!</p>
<p>Why? I appreciate (now) you trouble understanding that. It was that big word &#39;hyperbole&#39; again.</p>
<p>Jazz (and others) have been making a big deal that &#39;we have to investigate if Palin is really Trig&#39;s Grandma&#39;, because even though there are pictures of her being pregnant at the time, well, that wasn&#39;t good enough. Sliming her daughter seemed so much more fun.</p>
<p>Then, when it turns out that Bristol is currently pregnant, and has been for long enough to exclude her (yet again) as the the mother of Trig, then we get an unbelievable accusation that either the new pregnancy is faked, or as i said, the stuffed a new baby inside her to protect her Mom.</p>
<p>If the Left is willing to believe that BS, then why shouldn&#39;t I start my own set of completely facetious, implausible, and offensive rumors? I have been waiting for Jazz or one of the other illuminated lights that do the front page postings to run with it. After all, my rumor is as equally soured, and relevant, as all this crap and Palin, Trig and Bristol has been.</p>
<p>If you STILL can&#39;t understand what is going on, then there is nothing more I can do to help you overcome your comprehension shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lurxst</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141175</link>
		<dc:creator>lurxst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141175</guid>
		<description>A lot of the debate regarding Palin&#039;s motherhood and grandmotherhood illustrates the theory behind McCain&#039;s &quot;Hail Hary&quot; move. Her relative anonymity, now suddenly cast into the glare of the nation was supposed to be the needed distraction from the real issues of this campaign. As long as we follow the sideshow we don&#039;t get any substantive focus on what McCain really intends to do granted the presidency.  I already hear the cable news trying to set up Biden that he will have to reign himself in and be nice to her in the debates, etc.  If Obama and Biden maintain their discipline regarding staying issue focused they have it in the bag. Any criticism will still be directed at McCain himself, his running mate being such an unknown that it doesn&#039;t matter what she thinks, she has no policies to attack.  The GOP are praying to hear criticism regarding her mothering abilities in some effort to fire up all these supposed disaffected women voters out there.  That Palin is unprepared for the job  has little to do with her parenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of the debate regarding Palin&#39;s motherhood and grandmotherhood illustrates the theory behind McCain&#39;s &#8220;Hail Hary&#8221; move. Her relative anonymity, now suddenly cast into the glare of the nation was supposed to be the needed distraction from the real issues of this campaign. As long as we follow the sideshow we don&#39;t get any substantive focus on what McCain really intends to do granted the presidency.  I already hear the cable news trying to set up Biden that he will have to reign himself in and be nice to her in the debates, etc.  If Obama and Biden maintain their discipline regarding staying issue focused they have it in the bag. Any criticism will still be directed at McCain himself, his running mate being such an unknown that it doesn&#39;t matter what she thinks, she has no policies to attack.  The GOP are praying to hear criticism regarding her mothering abilities in some effort to fire up all these supposed disaffected women voters out there.  That Palin is unprepared for the job  has little to do with her parenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricorun</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricorun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141174</guid>
		<description>AR: &lt;i&gt;I will try to use smaller words when I direct a post to you, or add definitions like I did this time, in the hope that you might be able to keep up.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I appreciate the thought. But don&#039;t bend over backwards on my account. Use as many complicated words you want. I&#039;m pretty sure I can keep up. In fact, I&#039;m so sure that I find your implication laughable (especially about the lobotomy thing -- if you only knew). But that&#039;s neither here nor there. The fact is, your attack on me is nothing more than an ad hominem one. And frankly, I doubt  you are capable of much more. At least you have never exhibited such. You never even answered your own questions!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, I will rather respond to jwest, who at least has responded in detail, although he has changed the questions. What a surprise. Anyway...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If you’re a working woman – Palin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What legislation can Palin point to in that regard? More importantly perhaps, what legislation can McCain point to which he has supported in that regard?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If you’re a single mom – Palin’s daughter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ditto.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If you’re a blue collar working guy – Palin’s husband&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that&#039;s downright funny. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If you’re a real American family – The Palin family&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And somehow neither the Obama family or the Biden family is. Good luck selling that. Especially now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If you don’t hang out with terrorists – Anyone but Obama. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beware of McCain&#039;s lobbyist connections. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If you want more drilling – Palin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More to the point, if you want ONLY more drilling - Palin. It&#039;s going to be interesting to see how that plays out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If your church doesn’t preach “God Damn America – Palin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmmm... I suspect her connections may complicate this meme as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• If you like winning wars as opposed to surrendering/cutting/running – McCain&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want a coherent foreign policy -- Obama/Biden. If you want an incoherent foreign policy (or one that doesn&#039;t have a clue) -- McCain/Palin. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So... do I get to offer my own points now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AR: <i>I will try to use smaller words when I direct a post to you, or add definitions like I did this time, in the hope that you might be able to keep up.</i></p>
<p>I appreciate the thought. But don&#39;t bend over backwards on my account. Use as many complicated words you want. I&#39;m pretty sure I can keep up. In fact, I&#39;m so sure that I find your implication laughable (especially about the lobotomy thing &#8212; if you only knew). But that&#39;s neither here nor there. The fact is, your attack on me is nothing more than an ad hominem one. And frankly, I doubt  you are capable of much more. At least you have never exhibited such. You never even answered your own questions!</p>
<p>So, I will rather respond to jwest, who at least has responded in detail, although he has changed the questions. What a surprise. Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>• If you’re a working woman – Palin</p>
<p>What legislation can Palin point to in that regard? More importantly perhaps, what legislation can McCain point to which he has supported in that regard?</p>
<p>• If you’re a single mom – Palin’s daughter</p>
<p>Ditto.</p>
<p>• If you’re a blue collar working guy – Palin’s husband</p>
<p>Now that&#39;s downright funny. </p>
<p>• If you’re a real American family – The Palin family</p>
<p>And somehow neither the Obama family or the Biden family is. Good luck selling that. Especially now.</p>
<p>• If you don’t hang out with terrorists – Anyone but Obama. </p>
<p>Beware of McCain&#39;s lobbyist connections. </p>
<p>• If you want more drilling – Palin</p>
<p>More to the point, if you want ONLY more drilling &#8211; Palin. It&#39;s going to be interesting to see how that plays out.</p>
<p>• If your church doesn’t preach “God Damn America – Palin</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; I suspect her connections may complicate this meme as well. </p>
<p>• If you like winning wars as opposed to surrendering/cutting/running – McCain</p>
<p>If you want a coherent foreign policy &#8212; Obama/Biden. If you want an incoherent foreign policy (or one that doesn&#39;t have a clue) &#8212; McCain/Palin. </p>
<p>So&#8230; do I get to offer my own points now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141173</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141173</guid>
		<description>Aside from all that anyway, GD, what we&#039;re actually defending in this thread is the general concept that families deserve privacy and that candidates presumably have worked out their families abilities to handle the challenges of office should they win the election. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I&#039;m an &#039;agent&#039;? Cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from all that anyway, GD, what we&#39;re actually defending in this thread is the general concept that families deserve privacy and that candidates presumably have worked out their families abilities to handle the challenges of office should they win the election. </p>
<p>And I&#39;m an &#39;agent&#39;? Cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141172</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141172</guid>
		<description>GD: I believe that as much as you believe that Obama is qualified not just to step in, but actually to be president starting in January. I see Obama and Palin being a wash in terms of experience, though each brings different types of experience to the table. That&#039;s always the case with Senators vs. Governors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually think both of them will have to get up to speed if/when they take the reins as POTUS, but with Obama, if he&#039;s elected he will have to step into that immediately. Odds certainly aren&#039;t on McCain keeling over on Inauguration Day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GD: I believe that as much as you believe that Obama is qualified not just to step in, but actually to be president starting in January. I see Obama and Palin being a wash in terms of experience, though each brings different types of experience to the table. That&#39;s always the case with Senators vs. Governors.</p>
<p>I actually think both of them will have to get up to speed if/when they take the reins as POTUS, but with Obama, if he&#39;s elected he will have to step into that immediately. Odds certainly aren&#39;t on McCain keeling over on Inauguration Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141171</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141171</guid>
		<description>This is hilarious. The right is actually going to do, as its agents here are doing, a &quot;full throated&quot; endorsement and defense of Palin as being the best choice in America to step in as president at a moment&#039;s notice. The best choice Republicans have to offer. Damn. You guys really believe that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious. The right is actually going to do, as its agents here are doing, a &#8220;full throated&#8221; endorsement and defense of Palin as being the best choice in America to step in as president at a moment&#39;s notice. The best choice Republicans have to offer. Damn. You guys really believe that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141170</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141170</guid>
		<description>For once Jim and I agree- except for the last sentence of his post, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For once Jim and I agree- except for the last sentence of his post, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattonGuy</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141169</link>
		<dc:creator>PattonGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141169</guid>
		<description>Obama, no offense, doesn&#039;t have a newborn with Down&#039;s syndrome and a pregnant 17-year-old.  That is actually a slight difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama, no offense, doesn&#39;t have a newborn with Down&#39;s syndrome and a pregnant 17-year-old.  That is actually a slight difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-141168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/22305/can-this-get-any-weirder/#comment-141168</guid>
		<description>StockBoy,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    You really ought to drop the line of commentary about them being unable to control their daughter. I don&#039;t know how serious you are about it, but it has nothing to do with her qualifications for VP or lack of same. And this comes from someone who thinks she is completely lacking in qualifications and really doesn&#039;t care for her ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StockBoy,</p>
<p>    You really ought to drop the line of commentary about them being unable to control their daughter. I don&#39;t know how serious you are about it, but it has nothing to do with her qualifications for VP or lack of same. And this comes from someone who thinks she is completely lacking in qualifications and really doesn&#39;t care for her ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

