
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Bounce For Obama ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 21:51:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144693</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144693</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve all (at least most of us) talked about the accuracy of polls on this site over the months.  Doesn&#039;t Joe G. like to say that it&#039;s the trend that&#039;s most important?  Having said that I must admit that I groan (or swoon) depending on the results of any specific poll....  Though whether I like the poll results or not I remind myself that what&#039;s important is what happens at the polls in Nov.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At any rate, I came across this piece about the Des Moines Register poll (taken just before the Iowa caucus) showing that Obama was ahead.  Obama went ahead and won 38% (with Edwards at 30% and Clinton at 29%)...  THe piece is interesting because Obama&#039;s opponents said the Des Moines poll could not be trusted.  Apparently the Des Moines poll used a different methodology than other polls...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/01/obama-rivals-say-des-moin_n_79035.html&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/01/obama-...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#39;ve all (at least most of us) talked about the accuracy of polls on this site over the months.  Doesn&#39;t Joe G. like to say that it&#39;s the trend that&#39;s most important?  Having said that I must admit that I groan (or swoon) depending on the results of any specific poll&#8230;.  Though whether I like the poll results or not I remind myself that what&#39;s important is what happens at the polls in Nov.</p>
<p>At any rate, I came across this piece about the Des Moines Register poll (taken just before the Iowa caucus) showing that Obama was ahead.  Obama went ahead and won 38% (with Edwards at 30% and Clinton at 29%)&#8230;  THe piece is interesting because Obama&#39;s opponents said the Des Moines poll could not be trusted.  Apparently the Des Moines poll used a different methodology than other polls&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/01/obama-rivals-say-des-moin_n_79035.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/01/obama-&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144692</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144692</guid>
		<description>The professional polls use a sample size of at least 3000 and a multiple days average, the cable news polls use a sample size of only 1000. The larger sample size is more accurate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-pres-ge-mvo.php&quot;&gt;http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-pres-ge-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/general_election_match_up_history&quot;&gt;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/109900/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Continues-Lead-49-41.aspx&quot;&gt;http://www.gallup.com/poll/109900/Gallup-Daily-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/24/election.2008.poll/index.html&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/24/election...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From Rasmussen:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 1,000 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. The margin of sampling error—for the full sample of 3,000 Likely Voters--is +/- 2 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for the full-week results are available for Premium Members.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From Fox:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Polling was conducted by telephone August 19-20, 2008, in the evenings. The&lt;br&gt;total sample is 900 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of ±3&lt;br&gt;percentage points. Results are of registered voters, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br&gt;LV = likely voters&lt;br&gt;Democrats n=378, ±5 percentage points; Republicans n=315, ±5.5 percentage points;&lt;br&gt;independents n=180, ±7 percentage points&lt;br&gt;Obama supporters n=379, ±5 percentage points; McCain supporters n=353, ±5 percentage points&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The professional polls use a sample size of at least 3000 and a multiple days average, the cable news polls use a sample size of only 1000. The larger sample size is more accurate.<br /><a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-pres-ge-mvo.php">http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-pres-ge-&#8230;</a><br /><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/general_election_match_up_history">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/&#8230;</a><br /><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/109900/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Continues-Lead-49-41.aspx">http://www.gallup.com/poll/109900/Gallup-Daily-&#8230;</a><br /><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/24/election.2008.poll/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/24/election&#8230;</a></p>
<p>From Rasmussen:<br />
<blockquote>Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 1,000 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. The margin of sampling error—for the full sample of 3,000 Likely Voters&#8211;is +/- 2 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for the full-week results are available for Premium Members.</p></blockquote>
<p>From Fox:<br />
<blockquote>Polling was conducted by telephone August 19-20, 2008, in the evenings. The<br />total sample is 900 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of ±3<br />percentage points. Results are of registered voters, unless otherwise noted.<br />LV = likely voters<br />Democrats n=378, ±5 percentage points; Republicans n=315, ±5.5 percentage points;<br />independents n=180, ±7 percentage points<br />Obama supporters n=379, ±5 percentage points; McCain supporters n=353, ±5 percentage points</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeSorwell</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144691</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeSorwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144691</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s your reputation, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s your reputation, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pico13</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144690</link>
		<dc:creator>pico13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144690</guid>
		<description>The gallup poll showed the DNC to give Obama a 10 point bounce overall. He was up by 8 yesterday and the day before in that poll, and he lost 2 points today to lead by 6.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rasmussen showed that the DNC gave Obama about a 4 point bounce and lead. He lost one point today to lead by 3.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just latch onto whatever poll currently validates your political leanings and go with it. Everyone&#039;s happy that way! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gallup poll showed the DNC to give Obama a 10 point bounce overall. He was up by 8 yesterday and the day before in that poll, and he lost 2 points today to lead by 6.</p>
<p>Rasmussen showed that the DNC gave Obama about a 4 point bounce and lead. He lost one point today to lead by 3.</p>
<p>Just latch onto whatever poll currently validates your political leanings and go with it. Everyone&#39;s happy that way! <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick E</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144689</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144689</guid>
		<description>Actually I merely reported the new CNN poll since it was just announced.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, the issue is not the amount of a lead but the amount of a bounce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I merely reported the new CNN poll since it was just announced.</p>
<p>Also, the issue is not the amount of a lead but the amount of a bounce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeSorwell</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144688</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeSorwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144688</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So at least with that poll&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cherry-picking is rather dishonest. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll&quot;&gt;Rasmussen has Obama up by three. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/109903/Gallup-Daily-ObamaBiden-Ticket-Leads-Points.aspx&quot;&gt;Gallup has Obama up by six.&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, it could be you&#039;re too concerned with Gustav for due diligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So at least with that poll</p></blockquote>
<p>Cherry-picking is rather dishonest. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll">Rasmussen has Obama up by three. </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/109903/Gallup-Daily-ObamaBiden-Ticket-Leads-Points.aspx">Gallup has Obama up by six.</a>   </p>
<p>Of course, it could be you&#39;re too concerned with Gustav for due diligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T_Steel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144687</link>
		<dc:creator>T_Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144687</guid>
		<description>Bounces are overblown and manufactured.  They don&#039;t mean anything to the presidential race.  How many people are being polled anyhow?  100?  1000?  Whatever.  Until they can poll at least 15 million people, then I&#039;m not listening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah I&#039;m being simplistic but so what...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bounces are overblown and manufactured.  They don&#39;t mean anything to the presidential race.  How many people are being polled anyhow?  100?  1000?  Whatever.  Until they can poll at least 15 million people, then I&#39;m not listening.</p>
<p>Yeah I&#39;m being simplistic but so what&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vwcat</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144686</link>
		<dc:creator>vwcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144686</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s CNN.  &lt;br&gt;What do you expect?  One poll.  uh huh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Silhouette, I wonder what your excuse is for spending the whole summer throwing little tantrums because you did not get your way.&lt;br&gt;I see you feel that everything should be about you rather then the country.  Typical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s CNN.  <br />What do you expect?  One poll.  uh huh.</p>
<p>Silhouette, I wonder what your excuse is for spending the whole summer throwing little tantrums because you did not get your way.<br />I see you feel that everything should be about you rather then the country.  Typical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silhouette</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144685</link>
		<dc:creator>Silhouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144685</guid>
		<description>I wonder what next week&#039;s &quot;explanation&quot; is going to be..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what next week&#39;s &#8220;explanation&#8221; is going to be..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elrod</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-144684</link>
		<dc:creator>elrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/elections/22285/no-bounce-for-obama/#comment-144684</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to measure a true bounce now because of the Palin pick and the bizarre circumstances surrounding the GOP convention.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well have to wait until next week to see how things really stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s hard to measure a true bounce now because of the Palin pick and the bizarre circumstances surrounding the GOP convention.</p>
<p>Well have to wait until next week to see how things really stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

