An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Russia ‘Dying’ to Be What it Hates Most: A New America – Le Monde


The Sign Says: ‘Russian Sphere of Influence’
NATO Representatives Tell Georgia: ‘They Are Withdrawing’


Why has Russia gone on a rampage in Georgia? Thornike Gordadze of the Caucuses Observatory at the French Institute of Anatolian Studies has an interesting and compelling take:

“Russia is dying with desire to be what it hates most – a new America. An America which goes to war in Iraq without U.N. backing; An America that punishes Serbia; and an America that is godfather of the new state – Kosovo. ‘Europe is part of the periphery’ said a Russian MP. Russia has begun to imagine itself as a rising superpower confronting a declining America. The Russian media, entirely controlled by the Kremlin, has been feeding its readers with propaganda about new Russian grandeur.

“Russian MP Serguei Markov, a political scientist attached to the Kremlin, said that the signal to begin military operations had been given personally by Dick Cheney, and that Russia was at war against America – the only rival worthy of the new rival Russian power.”

By Thornike Gordadze*

Translated By Sandrine Agoerges

August 21, 2008

France – Le Monde – Original Article (French)

“We won’t behave like monkeys, we won’t imitate, we have our own house recipe!,” said Vladimir Putin at a press conference last February, shortly before the Western countries recognized the independence of Kosovo. This enigmatic statement has continued to haunt policy makers and analysts in Europe, who sensed that the reply would come in the Caucuses. In searching for culprits, Georgia had all the traits of an ideal sinner. For a long time, it had been accumulating negative points: fiercely pro-Western; stubbornly seeking greater Euro-Atlantic integration; and it had opened more and more of its territory to create an energy corridor that deprived Gazprom and its political offshoot – the Kremlin – of monopoly control over European supplies.

There were other candidates – the Baltic states and Ukraine – but the former had already been sheltered under the NATO umbrella, and the latter is too beg to be swallowed and digested with impunity at this stage.

The current war is not one between Georgians and their Ossetian minority, or even between Russia and Georgia for the control of South Ossetia. Between the figure of 2,000 civilian casualties in Ossetia brandished by Russian authorities and the fifty counted by investigators of Human Rights Watch, guess which is the most credible report? South Ossetia, governed for years by Russian officers, became a Russian enclave planted in the heart of an independent Georgia. Economically insignificant, demographically battered, Ossetia has become the most militarized area of the entire Soviet space: 2,500 armed men for every 35,000 residents.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the unfolding crisis in the caucuses.

  • DLS
  • DLS
    Russia wants control of oil and gas (will settle for sharing this from Iran in the case of the Caspian Sea, something nobody but the foolish in the West would accept without trying an alternative -- we're not trying to control anything here in the West, but just want to avoid total Russian or Russian-Iranian control), but it also wants military _and_ political as well as economic hegemony throughout its sphere of influence and it resents having fallen from superpower status and also iron domination of its sphere of influence (and beyond).
  • Nonsense. As I pointed out on the last Russia post, this is about control of financially lucrative resources. The US doesn't care about Georgian sovereignty or democracy as much as controlling access to oil through Georgian pipelines. Russia wants the same thing. Currently, Russia supplies much of the oil to Europe. The pipeline through Georgia was designed SPECIFICALLY to provide a non-Russian route that would put more power in our hands than Russia's. Of course, Russia intends to do the opposite, to assure they control this resource and capture maximum profit for selling it to Europe. It is true that this is about "sphere of influence" but not in the military hegemony sense, but in the sense of influence over commerce.
  • God save me from all this "Russia wants to be a superpower" crud. Of course Russia wants to be a superpower. Who wouldn't? I'll bet you even Burundi wants to be a superpower. The question is, who has the means and the ability to be a superpower? If the definition of superpower is "economic and military powerhouse," Russia would not reach it. Russia's 2007 estimated GDP in terms of dollars was 2.076 trillion. The USA's GDP was $13.86 trillion. China's GDP was $7.043 trillion. Russia's military, meanwhile, has some troops that are up to snuff, true. Those were the ones who invaded Georgia. The rest, meanwhile, are conscripts who have more skill on paper than in reality. Russia doesn't have the same ability, hypothetically, to bring conventional destruction to the U.S. that the U.S. does. We have a far bigger navy, more and better airplanes, and better trained soldiers with tanks and such far superior to the Russians' equipage. Meanwhile, NATO is further east than ever before, and stronger than ever, in terms of numbers. GET IT INTO YOUR HEADS, PEOPLE! RUSSIA IS NOT A SUPERPOWER!
  • matignon33
    Manchester2 a parfaitement raison... Comme on disait jadis à propos du père de Lyndon Johnson, il aurait pu se retirer avant qu'il ne soit trop tard. Tout comme les russes—et John McCain— négligent de faire aujourd'hui...
  • Manchester2
    As a former French teacher, I see that your caption needs correction. The sign doesn't mean "they have withdrawn." Rather, the verb is a present tense reflexive, meaning "they are withdrawing." That's an important difference, considering Russia's ongoing claim to Secretary Rice that "we're withdrawing," but their failure so far to do so.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC