An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Mark Warner Keynote: A Nominee That Should Have Been

warner.jpg

Tonight the Democrats were treated to their keynote address by the man that I wish they were nominating for President this week, former Virginia Governor Mark Warner. Warner is a former businessman who made a fortune in the early days of the cellular phone industry and went on to become Governor of his home state. He is currently a lock to become the state’s next US Senator.

As would be expected for most successful southern Democrats, Warner is a moderate who has worked well with Republicans (as he noted, during his term as governor the GOP held a 2-1 majority in the legislature). He has delivered an address which calls on the best of bipartisan cooperation.

He began his remarks by stating:

My fellow Democrats. My fellow Americans. The most important contest of our generation has begun.

Not the campaign for the presidency. Not the campaign for Congress. But the race for the future. And I believe from the bottom of my heart with the right vision, the right leadership, and the energy and creativity of the American people, there is no nation that we can’t out hustle or out compete. And no American need be left out or left behind.

Now of course, it is hardly a new thing for a speaker at a political convention to call on the future but given Warner’s past it is a good deal more compelling. Warner was one of those people who saw the future and acted on it.

His remarks show a good deal more respect for business and commerce than you might hear from some of his Democratic colleagues and also showed a sense of humor

After I graduated law school, it didn’t take long to realize that America really wouldn’t miss me as a lawyer. So I started a business. My first company failed in six weeks. My next one was much more successful. It failed in six months.

And then, a buddy of mine told me that there was this new idea. This thing called “car telephones” … “cell phones.” Friends told me: “Warner get a real job… No one’s going to want a phone in the car.” But I saw a different future. And with luck and a lot of hard work, I got in on the ground floor of the cell phone industry.

He went on to discuss the fact that it was important for everyone to recognize that it is only in a country like the United States could someone start out from humble beginnings and then move on through a series of failed businesses only to succeed in the end.

He then moved into the red meat section of the speech, talking about how important it was for everyone to have the same kind of opportunities and how problems like the inability to pay for college or the fear of losing a home or the burdens of being deployed over and over to Iraq are the fault of the Bush/McCain team. But even here he did so in a much less harsh or angry manner than some other speakers might have.

In his comments on the President he made some comments about what his biggest criticism was:

Let’s be fair, some of these challenges were inevitable. But all of them are more severe, more immediate, and more threatening because of the misguided policies and outdated thinking of this administration.

People always ask me, “What’s your biggest criticism of President Bush?” I’m sure you all have your own. Here’s mine: It’s not just the policy differences. It’s the fact that this president never tapped into our greatest resources — the character and resolve of the American people. He never asked us to step up.

Think about it: After September 11, if there was a call from the president to get us off foreign oil, to stop funding the very terrorists who had just attacked us, every American would have said, “How can I do my part?” This administration failed to believe in what we can achieve as a nation, when all of us work together.

With due respect to Mr. Warner, there were calls from both parties after 9/11 for us to get off of foreign oil and I don’t recall people rallying to the cause. He is right of course that we need to get off of our dependence but the problem is that, for one side, the only solution seems to be more drilling while, for the other side, the solution is to magically produce solutions overnight.

As you might expect his solution to the problems involves the election of Senator Obama and here I think he might be getting a tad too optimistic.

You know, America has never been afraid of the future, and we shouldn’t start now. If we choose the right path, every one of these challenges is also an opportunity. Look at energy. If we actually got ourselves off foreign oil, we can make our country safer. We’ll start to solve global warming. And with the right policies, within 24 months, we’ll be building 100 mile-per-gallon plug-in hybrid vehicles right here — with American technology and with American workers.

Look at health care. If we bring down costs and cover everyone, not only will America be healthier, we’ll be more competitive in the global economy. Just think about this: In six months, we will have an administration that actually believes in science! And then we can again lead the world in live-saving and life-changing cures.

Look at education. If we recruit an army of new teachers and actually give our schools the resources to meet our highest standards, not only will every child in America get a fair shot, the American economy will get a shot in the arm. Whether they want to be an engineer or an electrician, every kid will be trained for the jobs of the 21st Century.

Or look at America’s standing in the world. If we rebuild our military and rebuild our alliances, we can rally the world to defeat terrorism and restore America’s leadership.

Which candidate understands these opportunities, and which candidate knows we don’t have another four years to waste? Barack Obama. And Barack Obama knows this too: We need leaders who see our common ground as sacred ground. We need leaders who will appeal to us not as Republicans or Democrats, but first and foremost as Americans.

As I discussed above, here I think Senator-to-be Warner is a bit overly-optimistic in his solutions. I do think that hybrids are part of the solution of the future but if they are all plug-in cars, where is the electricity to power them going to come from? Coal plants? Oil plants ? We already have an energy problem in many places so I think there needs to be a little bit more of a solution here.

At this point in his speech, I think Warner demonstrated why, to at least some degree, the hopes of bipartisanship may be overly optimistic. Speaking to the delegates, Warner said:

I know we’re at the Democratic convention, but if an idea works, it really doesn’t matter if it has an “R” or “D” next to it. Because this election isn’t about liberal versus conservative. It’s not about left versus right. It’s about the future versus the past.

At this point the crowd reaction was mixed, while there were some cheers there were also a number of boos or at least grumblings. To me this demonstrates that there are at least some hard core Democrats who are unwilling to even consider working across the aisle (and, to be fair, an equal number of hard core Republicans). It’s part of the reason I think people like Warner and Schwarzenegger need to join together in a third party for the rest of us.

But the fact that he thinks this way is one of the reasons I have been such a fan. He went on to discuss some of the successes he had in his tenure as Governor offering them as an example for the country.

And we can do it. When I became Governor, this is what Virginia faced: a massive budget shortfall; an economy that wasn’t moving; gridlock in the capital. Sound familiar?

So what did we do? Working together — a Democratic governor with a two-to-one Republican legislature and a whole lot of good folks who didn’t see themselves as either Democrats or Republicans, but as Virginians — we closed the budget gap, and Virginia was named the best managed state in the nation.

We made record investments in education and in job training. We got 98 percent of eligible kids enrolled in our children’s health care program.

We delivered broadband to the most remote areas of our state, because if you can send a job to Bangalore, India, you sure as heck can send one to Danville, Va., and Flint, Mich., and Scranton, Pa., and Peoria, Ill. In a global economy, you should have to leave your home town to find a world-class job.

He also discussed how in towns like Lebanon Virginia they were able to take old mining communities and bring modern industry in to revitalize the community. He concluded his remarks by commenting on the somewhat awkward position he was in and the fact that he occupied a job once held by Jefferson:

As Governor of Virginia, it was humbling to occupy a position that was once held by Thomas Jefferson. Almost as daunting as delivering the keynote speech four years after Barack Obama…Or speaking before Hillary Clinton.

Towards the end of his life, Thomas Jefferson -the founder of our party- wrote one of his frequent letters to his old rival, John Adams. He complained about the aches of getting old, but what was on his mind was what life would be like for the next generation of Americans. As Jefferson was ready to go to sleep, he closed his letter by writing: “I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.”

Jefferson got it right at the dawn of the 19th century, and it’s our challenge to get it right at the dawn of the 21st. This race is all about the future. That’s why we must elect Barack Obama as our next president. Because the race for the future will be won when old partisanship gives way to new ideas. When we put solutions over stalemates, and when hope replaces fear.

Tonight, looking out at all of you, and with a deep faith in the character and resolve of the American people, I am more confident than ever that we will win that race and make the future ours.

All things considered, I was impressed by Warner and his speech. He recognized, I think, that with Clinton and Obama on the same docket that he wasn’t going to send the crowd into the same kind of frenzy as Obama did 4 years ago.

But he delivered an address that I think will find great appeal to the many, many voters who are neither hard-core Democrats or hard-core Republicans. This is what makes him so appealing to me and, sadly, what may have made it impossible for him to prevail in the Democratic primary/caucus process.

I do not know if the Obama/Biden ticket will win in November. I do not know if I will vote for them or against them. At this point those things are in the future.

But I do know that if Mr. Warner were speaking on Thursday, the election would probably be over right now.

  • Kathryn
    I just saw Brian Switzhter (sorry not sure on the spelling)do the intro for Hillary, wow. As Brooks noted, fun just entered the convention.
  • I agree, check out my posting on his address.

    Warner/Schweitzer 20**
  • APR
    The MSNBC panel (Maddow, Buchanan and co) went off on Warner's speech, basically saying it was terrible because it wasn't negative enough. Buchanan said it was entirely self-serving. I can sort of see their point, that at some point the Dems have to attack a bit. That being said though, this speech was classic Warner. He has been one of my favorites for a long time because he can very clearly and eloquently talk about specific policies and bipartisanship. He doesn't do the attack-dog thing though. My only guess then is that Maddow and Buchanan don't really know anything about Warner, since that seemed to be what they were expecting.
  • mikkel
    "only in a country like the United States could someone start out from humble beginnings and then move on through a series of failed businesses only to succeed in the end."

    People like Warner (and Libertarian leaning Republicans) need to stress this very strongly and try to get the bankruptcy bill of '05 repealed. When it was passed, I remember hearing on Marketplace how economists were studying why Europe had so little entreprenurial spirit compared to the US and they realized that a lot of it was that once you fail once over there it's nearly impossible to recover. It takes a person on average two (or is it three?) failed businesses before one succeeds and the bankruptcy bill is going to stifle small business creation for a long time.

    Not to mention that looking at bankruptcy stats a gigantic portion are from medical bills...

    In any case, the open secret is that Obama is actively acting on expanding the Democratic apparatus immensely and moving the power base away from the old timers, and more towards the Warner description of what types of leaders the US needs. It's no coincidence that he's the keynote.
  • elrod
    I loved Warner's speech.
  • kritt11
    Warner was probably passed over for the same reason he withdrew from the presidency-- whoever was vetting him found some info that would hurt the campaign. I remember when he withdrew reading that there was some infidelity in his past. Not everyone who looks great on paper passes muster in background checks. As a Democrat, I'm perfectly content with Biden.
  • Maybe it's because my general discontent with politics in this country is much less than it was four years ago, but he didn't inspire me as much as I'd have liked.

    And the last time I saw a speech of his, it was in person four years ago at my school. I thought that one was better.

    I liked a lot of what he said, but something about his speech tonight was off-putting to me.
  • superdestroyer
    The only way that a Mark Warner will ever be President is that ias the Repubican party completes its collapse that all of the former Republican voters start voting in the Democratic Primary and create enough moderate voters to gie a moderate white male a chance of winning the Democratic primary.

    What wil keep moderates from ever winnng the Democratic nomination is the need to move to the left to win the pirmary Moderate, southern white males have little crediblity when they try to do it.
  • kritt11
    The only way that a Mark Warner will ever be President is that ias the Repubican party completes its collapse

    Well, Superdestroyer, Isn't that what you've been predicting for the last 12 months? LOL
  • superdestroyer
    kritt,

    It depends of whether the estabishment Democartic Prty leader tries to limit the impact of former Repubicans in the coming one party America. The leadership in the Democratic Party has hinted at the desire to close the Democratic Party nomination system to limit the effects of Repubicans and independents (more caucuses and closed primaries, fewer open primaries). Also, the Democratic party could separate voting for state and local offices from the presidential voting.

    I have commented for some time that people should think about the impacts of the collapse of the Republican party and the coming one party state. At least you acknowledge that it could be good for moderate Democrats.
  • DLS
    Obama won the packaging contest this year. Sorry, no Warner (and no Romney).
  • DLS
    The end of Brian Schweitzer's speech represents what should have been the standard level of rallying throughout last night's presentation. He was great. Everything else was a failure. Note that Sibelius, the play-pen crowd's darling, was flat and predictable and made Nanci Pelosi look great by comparison (!). What a dud. Not only Sibelius but the entire evening at the convention but for Schweitzer, who again, should have been the model for everyone as the _base_ level of rallying.
  • DLS
    Pretty boy -- yep, all about superficiality and Feeling Good. Go, Dems, go.
  • kritt11
    SD--Uh- yes it probably would. But what would be even better is if conservatives would stop lumping the Bill Clintons in with the Michael Moores----if I listen to conservative talk radio--- all Democrats except Zell Miller (who isn't even in politics anymore) and Joe Lieberman (who isn't even a Democrat anymore --- he's got his lips too puckered up against McCain's rear for that) are said to be socialists.

    I happen to live in a one-party state, Maryland, and believe it or not, we are not in the midst of a moral or economic collapse. Professionals still make more than hamburger flippers at McDonald's, and there are still a good number of folks who have no health care. We have conservative Democrats., moderate Democrats and liberal ones too.
  • If you think Obama's speeches are full of fluff, I present to you, Mark Warner, the fluffmaster general.
  • DLS
    Warner-Romney, Romney-Warner 20xx. ("Does It Matter?")
  • superdestroyer
    kritt,

    there is no conservative Demcrats in Maryland. Of course, I doubt if you will be saying that O'malley is fiscally irresponsible for running up a $1.7 billion dollar budget shortfall or that the total number of whites in Maryland is decreasng, or that even the top school district, Montgomery is beginning to slip due to immigration and gangs.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC