This article was produced by Obamabots that are BITTER that Hillary has made it to the nominating process.

Who knew they had internet access at insane asylums?

Thank you.

I read through you torture posts at Kiko's House, excellent reporting, straight forward presentation of facts with conclusions and opinions added for clarity and framing. (do you know most people have no idea who David Addington is and his opinion of the constitution)

Writing and reporting like that is what I wish more of our press was doing unfortunately we know that won't happen.

This article was produced by Obamabots that are BITTER that Hillary has made it to the nominating process.

Look she WON the right to be voted on at the convention. GET OVER IT!

(LOL…sucks when the shoe's on the other foot eh?)
******
“Both women worshiped at the altar of political prominence and power, so much so that they overlooked clear evidence of their husbands’ violation of their wedding vows. They contributed to their husbands’ phony public personas as straight arrows and then circled their own wagons when confronted with the truth.”

*****

Yes, they're damned if they do and damned if they don't. This article's twin in its parallel universe where both women instead lambasted their husbands, spoke openly and bitterly about their affairs etc. would be entitled:

“Two Bitter Divorcees think they have a shot at politics”..

Yeah, that's right…

*******

So the haters, the Obama-droids are so mad that Hillary got the chance to be voted on at the convention that they have to print a smear article like this in retaliation.

They're so BITTER!

lol……

It really does suck to have your legitimate feelings about supporting a candidate reduced to petty persecution and belittling..

http://kikoshouse.blogspot.com/2008/04/index-of…

Torture, you're right I forgot you do write about that, I apologize.

I've also forgotten, are you one of those who rationalize and disemble about our usage of torture or do you actually present this subject in a straight forward manner?

Its been awhile you know, its been all Edwards all the time recently,

oops sorry, mentioned it again.

How sad that you don't consider torture a substantial issue.

I responding to you and Marlowecan on your comments about the press/expertise not the Edwards affair.

oops i just did it. sorrrrry

Ahhh that explains a lot.

So your expertise is not on Foreign Affairs, the Economy, the Environment or any other substantial issue that matter to people in this election year. It instead is on catching political figures in compromising situations and riding that until you've destroyed their ability to say anything of substance going forward.

Thanks for clearing that up.

And it took what, less than an hour for you to break your pledge?

Wait until you read my post on Edwards tomorrow.

For what it is worth, I haven't posted on Georgia, offshore oil drilling and a host of other current hot topics because I have neither the expertise nor believe I can add anything of substance to the coverage of those stories.

Contrast that with the 20-plus posts that I have done on the Bush torture regime, which you conveniently ignore and while they draw far fewer comments than my Edwards posts, do meet my own test: Which is to know what I'm talking about and being able to add something of substance.

And no, this won't be your last comment on Edwards because you can't help yourself.

I was tempted not to respond to your comment, but as I've learned from the Clinton impeachment and the lead up to the Iraq war leaving crap out there, even easily mocked and refuted crap seems to “some” as agreement or acknowledgment of rightness.

So on to mocking your easily refuted comment:

Shaun is a reporter he is one of the main conduits of information for you and I. What he chooses to cover or not cover, the way he covers a subject and his opinion of the subject is very important. Why? because our opinions and decisions on that subject is then shaped by the information he has or has not provided us.

My comparison of Shaun's John Edwards fixation to the MSM and their coverage of Bush's rise to the presidency is dead on. Tell me:

How could a former drunk, possible drug user, with a reputation as an intellectual lightweight and a past history of multiple brushes with the law and failed business become president of the United States.

The MSM decision to highlight Bush's “regular” guy persona while focusing on his opponents “stiff” manner all the time ignoring their actual qualifications for the job had a lot to do with it. The MSM framing of the candidates in this case skewed and slanted the information presented to you and I. While some of us took the time to research both candidates before making our decision, we had to watch in horror as the easily led lemmings of the populace (I wonder who you voted for, probably twice) took what was fed to them by the MSM and elected a man with absolutely no qualifications for the job.

For me, there is no wonder at what has entailed over the past 7+ years, I expected it, we got what we deserved.

Our press matters, particularly in this day and age when most people don't take the time to research the truth about the candidates. The information given to us should be truthful and just as important be of consequence, not just titillating (leave that to the National Enquirer).

Hahahahahaha….

What I have long suspected IS true . . . it IS all ALL SHAUN MULLEN's fault!

Some folks blame Bush, some Rove . . . but in reality, it was Mullen all along.

Time to break out the torches and the pitchforks . . . .

Since the John Edwards story broke how many posts has he made on it?
– 3, 5, 7, Its probably more than 9 in just a weeks time. And this does not include his comments, which are probably approaching 50.

As a contrast lets look at his posting on a substantial story that broke about the same time.

Since the Russian / Georgian war story broke how many posts has he made on it?
- 9, 7, 5, Its probably less than 2 in a weeks time. And his comments, they're probably approaching 0.

Reporters like him are why we have George Bush as a President.
Reporters like him are why 4100 Americans and countless Iraqis have died in a war of choice.
Reporters like him are why the US economy is in a recession.

Please, please God give us reporters who can and more important will differentiate between an issue that is important to the country's wellbeing and one thats important to their personal wellbeing.

This will be my last comment on this subject.

Both women worshiped at the altar of political prominence and power, so much so that they overlooked clear evidence of their husbands’ violation of their wedding vows. They contributed to their husbands’ phony public personas as straight arrows and then circled their own wagons when confronted with the truth.

Bill Clinton has a public persona as a straight arrow?

And wasn't Edwards public persona (thanks to Limbaugh, Coulter and Dowd) that he was gay?

I don't play God and I didn't stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night. Elizabeth Edwards made a series of choices that I will not second guess, only point out in the context of my post.

This article was produced by Obamabots that are BITTER that Hillary has made it to the nominating process.

Who knew they had internet access at insane asylums?

This article was produced by Obamabots that are BITTER that Hillary has made it to the nominating process.

Who knew they had internet access at insane asylums?

Thank you.

Thank you.