An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Questioning Elizabeth Edwards’ ‘Excruciating Anguish’

I have to admit being gullible enough to have accepted John Edwards story as I watched the first telling. That didn’t last long. But what about Elizabeth?

Mickey Kaus notes that both the People Magazine cover story and the National Enquirer agree that she is the victim. Not Kaus:

Elizabeth Edwards, rather than being its victim, is in on it up to her eyeballs! Why do I think this is a real possibility? First, Elizabeth was in on the first coverup, allowing her husband to go out and deny the initial Enquirer reports of his affair. (He admits to Woodruff that she knew these denials were false,) Second, she might see her legacy as bound up with her husband’s–and also want her children to have a father with a political future.** Third, Elizabeth Edwards is famously smart, and a lawyer. Does still she really think the Enquirer is just making up the part about how Edwards’ affair with Hunter restarted around the time Hunter got pregnant? She can’t possibly be as dumb as People thinks its readers are.

Meanwhile, Ted Frank looks into the real estate genius of paternity-claimer Andrew Young:

Andrew Young, who publicly claims to be the father of Rielle Hunter’s baby (though he hasn’t been heard from since John Edwards’s confession of an affair), was moved to Santa Barbara by the generosity of John Edwards’s campaign chairman, trial lawyer Fred Baron. He was paid $3,500/month to work for the Edwards campaign. Yet the Raleigh News & Observer reports that Andrew Young and his wife sold their Chapel Hill house to Carolyn Grissom for a jaw-dropping $1.2 million on February 14, 2007, and moved into the Chapel Hill Governors Club country-club gated community, where they rented a few doors down from Hunter. (Rentals there are available for as low as $1700/month, and home prices range from $289,000 to $2.3 million, so nothing necessarily unusual about that.)

What’s more unusual is that North Carolina real-estate records on the web show that Andrew and Cheri Young purchased the 5000-square-foot house for $300,000 on September 28, 2005. (The home was built in 1989, so they weren’t buying a vacant lot and building.) So either Andrew Young is a secret real-estate genius on a level not seen since Hillary Clinton’s commodities trading, and was able to flip a house for a 300% and $900,000 return in under eighteen months, or something else is going on. [READ ON]

  • Silhouette
    Glad to see you all focusing on the Edwards extramarital activities.

    It did take a really long time for this story to surface; but then again, Edwards was getting a little close to making the Obama ticket look like a win as its VP. The GOP, via proxies, chose this timing (even though the Edwards scandal was "in play" for quite some time but not being surfaced mainstream) to make sure Edwards didn't get on the Obama ticket.

    There's another, nearly identical, but far more seedy story "in play" that hasn't been allowed to surface yet.

    Just after Denver, look for that to happen.

    I said before that Obama getting ahead in this race will be his undoing, precisely and identically like it was Edwards'. If he does, they'll take him down. If he doesn't, he'll lose anyway, predictably.

    Everyone get behind Obama!

    I'm going to call the Obama campaign from now on "The Lemming Syndrome"...
  • Sil,
    Vincent Foster.
  • Rudi
    Kaus was/is tainted by his fling with Coulter. The woman has terminal cancer and is staying with her husband for their children's sake, whats so strange about this? Will Kaus wonder like the Limpbaugh about the reason for Edwards...
  • Yeah, not to pick on you Joe, but I don't see any particular public value in this story.
  • shaun
    This is a tough one because we want Elizabeth Edwards to fit our stereotype of the poor besmirched cancer-stricken wife.

    I do in fact feel badly for her, but as I have written and believe even more strongly with every new revelation, she shared her husband's lust for political prominence and power and she allowed this to get the best of her. Hillary Clinton, minus the cancer, was the same way.
  • AustinRoth
    Chris - yeah, no need to even think about this story, huh? I mean, really, if you can't figure out an angle to blame and beat up Bush and the Republicans (Sil's likely drug-induced conspiracy rambling aside), then why cover ANY story, right?
  • AR,
    Dog bites man... or man bites dog...

    It shouldn't surprise you in the least that:
    A) A man cheated on his wife
    B) That man and his wife lied about it to protect their reputations

    Moreover, it has no effect on my life, or on yours. We're talking about two people that aren't holding or seeking a public office.
  • DLS
    "We're talking about two people that aren't holding or seeking a public office."

    Not a VP possibility, not a Cabinet possibility, nothing?

    Has he not held public office in the past? And sought to be VP?

    If he engages in misconduct and dishonesty now, why should we trust him in office?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/Enxit Group, LLC