An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

On Prejudice and Waste by the Pentagon

This from the August 5, Christian Science Monitor, in an article titled “U.S. Army hopes to keep native Arabic speakers”

The Army may begin paying a retention bonus of as much as $150,000 to Arabic speaking soldiers in reflection of how critical it has become for the US military to retain native language and cultural know-how in its ranks. Only one other job in the Army, Special Forces, rates such a super-sized retention bonus. Now, as the military makes a fundamental shift toward rewarding the linguistic expertise it needs the most, it is expanding a program to train and retain native Arabic and other speakers from the same regions in which it is fighting.

Nowhere in the article is there mention of how the same U.S. Army has been discharging expensively trained Arabic linguists by the dozens…because they are gay.

As of May 2007, the military had kicked out at least 58 Arabic linguists because of their sexual orientation, and because of “Don’t ask, Don’t Tell,” a policy that prohibits openly gay individuals from serving in the military.

A couple of weeks ago, on the occasion of the House of Representatives’ first hearing in 15 years on the policy, I commented on the absurdity, shame, and cost of this policy.

Specifically referring to the waste in skills, talent, money and, most importantly, human resources and dignity that this policy is costing our nation, I wrote:

Never mind that the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy cost taxpayers nearly $191 million in lost training and personnel and skills replacement costs during the policy’s first 10 years, according to a GAO report.

Never mind that the policy has resulted in the release of 12,000 good troops for reasons of sexual orientation, including dozens of Arabic speakers whose skills are of immense value to the military in the war on terrorism.

Yes, we frivolously kicked out dozens of these “capable, highly skilled Arabic linguists…[a loss that] continues to compromise our national security during time of war,” as stated in a letter from the House of Representatives to the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee after three more gay linguistic specialists were fired a year ago.

In continuing to stress the importance of having Arabic linguistic experts in the war on terror, the Christian Science Monitor shares with us:

After the invasion of Iraq and the insurgency that followed, the US military recognized its dearth of linguistic competence in the country it had just toppled, and it scrambled to identify Arabic and other linguists. The military’s conventional language training program, the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, Calif., could not churn out enough American soldiers proficient in Arabic, Kurdish, Dari, Pashtu, and Farsi, and the military quickly turned to private contractors to fill the gap.

Yet, not a word about those linguists the U.S. Army has shown the door because of their sexual orientation.

Why are we paying $150,000 bonuses when a little tolerance might have sufficed?

  • superdestroyer
    Since I have read post that are nearly identical to this on other blogs with the same references and the same pull quotes, I assume that there is some homosexual activist mailing list that is pushing this.

    I have always wonder why so many allegedly gay men decided to study Arabic when the Arab culture is so anti-homosexual. I suspect that many of the 58 just used a claim of homosexuality to get out of their obligation and make more money in a safer environment in the private sector.
  • DLS
    [sigh] Don't overreact to this or to the gays-in-the-military issue as if it's some kind of crusade. Nobody wants this shoved down our throats -- it's a milder form of the screaming AIDS activists in the 1980s who demanded instant solutions to their predicaments and were always dissatisfied and scummily shrill, no matter how much of a miracle it was that we progressed with more speed on AIDS research than on practically anything else attempted.

    Believe it ot not, even when the South was still racist and wrong, they were subjected to unwarranted abuse by people whose comportment was in no way honorable. (The same goes for the Viet Cong and USSR-sympathetic Vietnam War opponents.)

    Can't goals be pursued in an intelligent and patiently progressive rather than in a neurotic, childish, or worse manner? Can't you face reality today and wait until January? (Some _civilized_ questioning of Obama and McCain and involvement with Democratic Party platform expected and understood, naturally.)

    Look beyond your noses!
  • DLS
    "even when the South was still racist and wrong, they were subjected to unwarranted abuse by people whose comportment was in no way honorable"

    (Which continues to this day -- white Southerners are a PC target for negative stereotyping to outright hatred, same as with Religious Right members; Obama, where is your outreach)
  • DLS
    "I assume that there is some homosexual activist mailing list that is pushing this"

    This could well be, but that would be coincidental -- it also involves Bush Administration-style politicizing of things and ineptitude by those people. Not that Dems have not done that; if anything they have been much worse, in government, media (obviously), and academia (notoriously, too). But this was similar to the Bush people wanting to act against, say, providing birth control as part of health care assistance to the Third World. Not merely abortion, but contraception.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC