An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Mojave experiment: is Windows Vista as bad as we think it is?

Farhad Manjoo, now at Slate, reports on Microsoft’s “strange Mojave experiment”:

In mid-July, representatives of Microsoft traveled to San Francisco in search of people who hated Windows Vista. The company recruited 140 Mac and PC users who thought Microsoft’s latest operating system was slow, that it crashed constantly, that it was incompatible with various devices, and that installing it would be a pain. None of these people had ever used Vista; they’d only heard from others that it sucked. When they were asked to watch a short demonstration of a brand-new Microsoft operating system called Windows Mojave, the Vista-haters were blown away. The new OS was quick and pretty, it handled photos and videos and music with aplomb, and it never crashed. “Why didn’t you guys release this instead of that Vista crap?” many wondered.

You know what’s coming…”Windows “Mojave” was really Windows Vista.” Farhad isn’t buying. He says the Windows Vista isn’t a terrible operating system. But that they put videos of the experiment online and turned it into an ad campaign, at best, conveys a mixed message. What’s more:

Participants in the Mojave Experiment were selected based on an obviously irrational aversion to Vista. They were silly to have hated Vista without ever trying it. And that’s what the experiment proved—that people who blindly believe that Vista is a nightmare are happy to learn that it’s not.

But it’s also important to point out what Microsoft’s test doesn’t prove: that you should buy Windows Vista. Participants in the Mojave Experiment handled the software for just a few minutes, and they were helped along by a technician who showed them the ins and outs (a service that Apple offers for new Mac buyers but which you’d be hard-pressed to find for a Windows machine). The test subjects didn’t have to suffer through the frustration of installing the OS, setting it up to work with a printer or home network, starting it up, shutting it down, or seeing it drag during a fast-paced game.

Microsoft says it did the campaign because “perceptions [of the improved Windows Vista] have not necessarily kept pace with reality” and that people who harbored “a negative perception hadn’t actually seen or used the product.”

My experience with college students suggests that Microsoft is correct; they’ve got a big perception problem. If Farhad is correct — “if you’ve got to fool them, haven’t you already lost?” — this campaign won’t do much to help out.

  • Neocon
    I installed windows vista on top of my xp the minute it was available. It was a pain. It crashed. In the first 6 months I had to reinstall vista 3 times. It would download its own updates and crash trying to install them. I would download the same update, fail and then constantly annoy you about updates that needed installing.

    In short the first 6 months I had vista on this machine it was extremely annoying. About 6 months ago I reinstalled vista for the last time and installed sp1. Since then its been practically flawless and is very quick and is a good system.

    Like anything else in the computer world when you have millions of lines of code its gonna take awhile to work out the bugs.

    Windows Vista is the last windows OS. Microsoft has announced they are giving up on windows for good with Vista.
  • Marlowecan
    Earlier this year, as part of a lawsuit, reams of internal MS e-mails were released. Among them were hilarious complaints - by people such as Microsoft's CEO Ballmer - that he couldn't install Vista on his home computer.

    See: "Microsoft execs saw problems with early Vista"
    with links to the e-mails themselves
    http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/352993_m...

    Hahahahaha....

    Yes, Vista's first Service Pack helped immensely, but early adopters decreed the code was half-baked when RTMed. And they were right.

    (Yes, there are obvious analogues here to politics - and defining images of candidates "Obama the Celebrity" "McCain the Cranky Old Man" for "early adopters" before the public really looks at them in September.)

    Granted the driver problems weren't Microsoft's responsibility. But innumerable other issues were:
    (1) the long delay when copying files, the resources issue.
    (2) UAC going off continually.
    (3) Indexing thrashing the hard drive non-stop for Windows Search.

    Plus, Microsoft is still spending more time on bloody marketing than on fixing issues with the OS.

    Consider that almost all the updates - except for those big reliability updates last year - are security updates. Not improving the usability of the OS.

    Vista still, even when sp1, regularly forgets the locations and sizes of common windows. The reason: it looks to the place in the Registry where XP stored the value for the number of windows to remember. Thing is. . . this location has shifted in the Vista registry.

    One part of the Vista development team didn't tell the other part what they were doing.

    This issue is widely known . . . and can be corrected with a simple script . . . thus making Vista user happiness a little bit better.

    But Microsoft has never released an update for this. They just don't care about annoyances - and User Friendliness - with the OS, even when they can be easily fixed. Instead, they launch this absurd marketing project.
  • RyanS
    Windows Vista is the last windows OS. Microsoft has announced they are giving up on windows for good with Vista.
    reply


    Ahem.. Windows 7
  • superdestroyer
    Ii would not trust Microsoft to make an operating system that is machine independent. One of the early complaints about Vista is that it used too much power when installed on a notebook computer. Once again, it was probably due to each group in development wanting to do things while the notebook was on without thought to energy consumption.
  • Rambie
    Just like XP, Vista didn't get usable until SP1 and should be good by SP2. Every version of Windows has needed more resources and vista isn't new in that regard.

    I use Vista and I'm not a fan, I wouldn't say I HATE it but dislike it.

    I use Ubuntu on my older laptop and it runs so much better than even XP did on the same hardware.
  • christoofar
    Too many driver issues ( maybe not their fault, but it is the OS that they want you to use & enjoy)
    Too much security crap you have to turn off just to open a file, etc.
    Too much DRM crap. Period.
    For what I use a PC for, it offers no improvement over XP that I can find worth all the hassle.
    Costs too much. Linux is not a viable option. XP works just fine.
  • As someone that does technical support for a living I can honestly say I'd rather troubleshoot a machine running Windows 95, ME, or NT than a machine running Vista.
  • Neocon
    It's true: Microsoft has confirmed that it's abandoning Windows as we know it. Cagey as ever, the Microsofties won't say when it'll happen, but they have talked a little bit about what the next OS is going to look like--or not look like.

    Incidently word on the street is that Windows 7 is going to be much like Windows Millenium......just another way to get cash while they make the transition to the new windows cloud computing.
  • RememberNovember
    I think most of the problems with Windows Vista stem from the upgrade process rather than a clean install. What happens is you get new coded slapped on top of old code that may not sync with the new.
    There were a lot of issues when it came out- a radio jock documented his own troubles upgrading ( took him like 8 hours to get everything working) to Vista- in the end he downgraded. It is not a mythical issue. M$ is just playing gotcha PR with perceptions, that's all.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC