An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Political Ad Watch – The Hypocrisy of Celebrity

">/0.jpg" alt="YouTube Preview Image" />

Can someone get John McCain’s video production staff on the line for me? I think they owe me a byline on their latest ad attacking Barack Obama. Last week, in the aftermath of Obama’s German speech, I wrote a column entitled “The Political Pop Star” whose last line made a connection to the current negative connotation of celebrity in our society and it reads:

“Initially, pop stars are interesting to watch and attract a lot of media attention. Unfortunately, some of them go crazy and act a bit strange. Wasn’t Michael Jackson called the ‘King of Pop’ in the 1990s…does anyone want him to run the country?”

The McCain campaign took the idea and ran away with it in linking Obama’s political celebrity with the antics of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. While this was not an unexpected turn of events, there are two very serious problems with the argument the McCain campaign is trying to communicate: the message and the messenger.

As far as the message, the key line in the campaign ad is the following: “He’s the biggest celebrity in the world, but is he ready to lead?” Excuse me, but when is the President of the United States not the biggest celebrity in the world? The President, as “The Leader of the Free World,” is on television infinitely more often than any Hollywood or Pop music star. Another relevant point that connects with Obama’s speech in Berlin is the connection with the other two men who were celebrities before they became President; Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy.

Ronald Reagan was a successful movie star and served as the President of the Screen Actors Guild before he ran for his political office. John F. Kennedy held celebrity status by his Naval service aboard PT-109 in 1943 and his Pulitzer Prize winning book, “Profiles in Courage” in 1956. Most Americans consider that these men, regardless of their ideological differences, were two of the best Presidents of the twentieth century.

As far as the messenger, I find McCain’s arguments to be hypocritical at best. McCain’s own political career is owed to his celebrity status as a war hero in his time as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. His national celebrity allowed him the opportunity to work on Capitol Hill and win his first run for elective office in 1982 for the U.S. House of Representatives from Arizona nine years after being released from the Hanoi Hilton and less than two years from retiring from the Navy in Washington, D.C.

One would think that McCain’s staff would have done a bit of fact-finding on their boss before putting out this ad. Sometimes the need to make political points overrules common sense…or the bothersome facts of reality.

  • Neocon
    Nothing wrong with this message at all. Nothing.

    Everything in this add is the truth. Subjective to him being the most popular in the world but man I can't get over how thin skinned the Obama people are.

    Did he not say no to drilling?
    Did he not say he was going to raise taxes on the rich?

    Truth hurts I guess when your trying to hide your real agenda.
  • DLS
    The message in that ad is 100% valid, as would be any depiction of young, impressionistic group-cultist Obama voters voting for Obama, looking to him with tears in their eyes, etc. 100% valid.

    The problem is that the ad was run too late to be effective, and the poor (late) timing is what is remarkable here, showing more campaign ineptitude. The term "pathetic" may strike some as too strong for this, but it fits here, clearly.
  • The message in that ad is 100% valid, as would be any depiction of young, impressionistic group-cultist Obama voters voting for Obama, looking to him with tears in their eyes, etc. 100% valid.


    When you can't win on issues, just use personality based attacks. Let's try one on DLS: "DLS is a jerk. Do we really want a jerk in White House?"
  • DLS
    Another McCain screw-up -- not exposing Obama's tax plan for Social Security and addressing details not included (beginning with demand them from Obama).

    Will those subject to the additional taxes have their benefits raised appropriately? If there is no rise in benefits at all for these people, Obama is merely a low-life thief and typical left-wing seizer and redistributor of money for vote-buying among those whose votes are bought (and cheaply as well as easily). An extension of the regression in the "replacement ratios" is understandable and if it is consistent with current replacement-ratio skewing, fine, but no change for those hit by the tax is simple theft.

    And why does he leave a donut hole open in the tax scheme? He wants to raise the tax on $250,000 and above, but what is left alone is the current limit in the low-mid $100s. Why the gap? Is this a sop and a payoff to his affluent white so-called "Progressive" supporters, deliberately letting them be free riders while those at higher incomes are deliberately and cynically targeted for an appeal to class envy?

    And is McCain silent because he is inept, once again?

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121745962594698...
  • RememberNovember
    This ad makes about as much sense as South Park's Chewbacca defense in the OJ parody.

    Somebody call Mythbusters to see if it's possible to jump the shark for such a long distance....
  • RememberNovember
    nothing wrong if you appreciate ad hominem attacks and whisper campaigning, nope nothing wrong at all. Stock in trade for neocons who love to spin the tail on the donkey.
  • DLS
    "When you can't win on issues, just use personality based attacks."

    You fail again, Chris. You're wrong about this as well as your lousy alternative.
  • DLS
    "Truth hurts I guess when your trying to hide your real agenda."

    Or when the public rejects it, in the case of the no-drilling reptilian position. It adds to the children's irritation, I suppose, when the child-like appeal of Obama is addressed. Their response lately has been quite low-quality-level. Pathetic as well as irritating.
  • Marlowecan
    Tony C said: "Excuse me, but when is the President of the United States not the biggest celebrity in the world? The President, as “The Leader of the Free World,” is on television infinitely more often than any Hollywood or Pop music star."

    When that President name is "Bush". Both Bush's were anathema to America's fascination with celebrity. Will "W" be on Entertainment Tonight? Make it to Defamer online? Nope.

    Thus, the President is not necessarily a celebrity.

    This was a good attack strategy . . . especially given the media explosion over Obama in Europe. America celebrates . . . then turns on its celebrities!

    I know the Obama folks here totally disagree . . . but regardless of what you say, Obama's campaign is not ignoring the significance of this attack strategy.

    Look for Obama in small-town USA for the next while. Obama and Michelle as "Just Folks" . . . not globe-trotting like Brangelina.

    Obama will not . . . NOT . . . be seen at Hollywood fundraising bashes with Oprah for the next while. Count on it!
  • DLS
    "Truth hurts I guess when your trying to hide your real agenda."

    Or when the evangalical-as-well-as-charismatic nature of Obama 2008 is revealed. Man, the kids are in an ugly mood.

    And why hasn't McCain worked on issues like this?

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121728762442091...
  • DLS,
    More personal attacks eh? How about this:
    You're the one in a child-like trance, blindly following each and every conservative/MSM talking point about Obama.
  • DLS
    "Obama will not . . . NOT . . . be seen at Hollywood fundraising bashes with Oprah for the next while. Count on it!"

    You're a racist!
  • mlhradio
    The responses to this silly ad (as well as the last silly McCain ad) are entirely predictable. Pro-Obama people condemn it with a passion, while pro-McCain people hem and haw and say "What's the fuss?" No surprises there.

    What I'm more interested in, is how this latest onslaught of negative campaigning from McCain is playing among that thin sliver of undecided or middle-of-the-road voters. It really doesn't matter how well these ads play with the hardcore supporters on both sides -- 80% of America has already made up its mind. How the ad affects the non-committed is infinitely more important.
  • DLS
    You fail again, Chris. And can you please learn, in addition to logic, the proper definitions of terms you wish to use? Thanks in advance.

    My, you're touchy about the facts and aggressive about alternatives to them today.
  • DLS
    "What I'm more interested in, is how this latest onslaught of negative campaigning from McCain is playing among that thin sliver of undecided or middle-of-the-road voters."

    Badly, because McCain is being inept. He only now addresses Obama's celebrity? He does not push his superior energy positions? He does not dig into other issues such as I've posted links to, to help start to part the Wizard's curtain?

    No.
  • DLS,
    I just think it's sickening and stupid to focus on things like whether or not Obama's supporters like him too much. We've got bigger problems to worry about, and McCain (and apparently you) isn't focused on them.
  • JSpencer
    "RememberNovember: "Stock in trade for neocons who love to spin the tail on the donkey."

    Sad but true. Fortunately most folks will see this ad for the absurd portrayal it is. Methinks some folks are suffering from a serious maturity deficit.
  • Marlowecan
    Mlhradio said: "What I'm more interested in, is how this latest onslaught of negative campaigning from McCain is playing among that thin sliver of undecided or middle-of-the-road voters. "

    Actually, I don't think most Americans will pay much attention until holidays are over in September. Seriously!

    I consider these ads sort of previews to Test Audiences (i.e. us). The GOP is trying to see what will stick to Obama. There has been some speculation in GOP circles for a while about exploiting the Obama/elitist/arrogant meme . . . the celebrity attack line may be a useful way of doing this (particularly given how Hollywood has gone gaga over Obama).

    Thus, I doubt the non-committed really care much yet. Most non-political people I know have only a few scraps about either . . . and really care less. The sun is shining . . . the Iraq War is out of the news . . . the economy may be in trouble, but it is summer.

    Time to see Dark Knight in IMAX. (Nope, no reference to Obama there :)
  • pacatrue
    This ad, especially following the last couple from the campaign, screams to me a couple things:

    1) "We are so uninspired with our own candidate and any ideas the Republican party has that we are just going to attack, attack, attack!"

    2) "We're going to bet that Americans are really stupid!"

    Seriously, first you get an ad that Obama won't visit troops without cameras when you know full well he's done precisely that several times. Then you get: people actually like him, especially our allies! There's no way someone people like should be President!

    There is no relationship between Obama and Paris Hilton or Britney Spears. It's just stupid slander. Hilton stands against pretty much every personal value that Obama has campaigned for -- responsibility, thinking beyond yourself, accomplishment. Oh, that's right. Harvard degrees, successful law practice, community organizing, years in your state Senate. He just inherited all of those things as the diva heiress he is.

    Seriously, Republicans are showing a gigantic zenophobic streak here. It's actually considered a dangerous and negative thing if your own allies support you. It's idiotic. Would someone like to tell the McCain campaign that Hitler's not in control of Germany anymore?

    I'll repeat what I've said before. McCain has strengths as a candidate. Conservative philosophy has merits. And they all appeal to real American voters. But apparently his campaign only sees Obama everywhere they turn. They must bring him down because apparently they don't think they can build McCain up. I humbly disagree. McCain's a better candidate than he or his campaign seems to think.
  • pacatrue
    Actually, I agree with Marlowecan's last comment. The McCain campaign is mudslinging right now to see what plays. However, I hate mudslinging.
  • Neocon
    Sad but true. Fortunately most folks will see this ad for the absurd portrayal it is. Methinks some folks are suffering from a serious maturity deficit.

    Honestly Jspencer if you believe this then why even be upset with it. When I see funny stuff slamming Bush, Cheney, Obama, McCain, Pelosi............I laugh.

    When are you guys going to learn to laugh. Perhaps your too uptight about loosing a 3rd election in a row.

    In 2000 Al Gore tried to stay more moderate and lost. In 2004 the Democrats just up and elected a lefty in John Kerry and Lost. This time around You have rejected the heir apparent in Hillary for a far lefty in Obama who is now pretending to be a moderate when he is not unveiling socialist programs while hes campaigning on ending the war but escalating the war..............whew....

    I can see why you guys are sweating the fact hes only a few points up on Zombie McCain. If Obama hired me Id have him up by 20 in a week.
  • JSpencer
    Rest assured Neocon, your own comedic contributions are not going unappreciated.
  • pacatrue
    Sorry, i had a post here about inconsistency in neocon's comments. But I now realize I misread him and where he was quoting. Therefore my comment was inaccurate and unfair. In case anyone read it in the last 5 minutes before I discovered the error, it's now gone.
  • Ricorun
    Fortunately most folks will see this ad for the absurd portrayal it is. Methinks some folks are suffering from a serious maturity deficit.

    Would this deficit apply only to the prospective consumers? Or should the producers be similarly accused as well? I guess that's the question -- how big is the "gullible vote"? Conversely, how big is the faction that is tired of the same old kind of politics?

    At any rate, McCain said today that he's proud of the campaign he's running.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq9Z16B8Cwk
  • pacatrue
    I do find many Obama jokes quite funny. I love takes in both JibJab and Jon Stewart at times with Obama riding on unicorns as flowers fly from his butt or whatever. They take genuine aspects of Obama's message of hope and improvement and make fun of them by taking them to absurd heights. This ad, however, is about ridiculing people who think Obama has better policies by implying they are all celebrity worshippers without a brain. Not as funny unless you are already convinced that everyone who disagrees with you is a child.
  • JSpencer
    Ricorun, let's hope the "gullible vote" is in less evidence in 08 than it was in 00 or 04. As for McCain being proud of his campaign? It's disappointing to see a man I once respected and indeed voted for choose the mud-slinging route as his main M.O.
  • Rambie
    Another McCain flip-flop. These types of attacks were bad in 2000 when used against him, but now it's OK because he is USING them.
  • timr
    and I see the ad as giving a subtle but still racist message. The ad itself is not about clebs, or "pop stars" as I see it-from the perspective of a 60 year old white man-is that the ad is all about the juxtaposition of Obama(an AA) with 2 "hot" young white women who are well known for being rather promiscuous(hilton and her sex tape, which made her famous). As I understand it, this ad was made by the same person who brought us the Harold Ford "call me" ad., which some say cost Ford the election. Like I said. Racist, but subtle.
  • DLS
    "We've got bigger problems to worry about, and McCain (and apparently you) isn't focused on them."

    Appearances are deceiving to some -- and it's a vision problem with you today.

    * * *

    "I see the ad as giving a subtle but still racist message."

    This is what extremists and extremism-fad-followers (the equivalent of bandwagon riders seeing Commies under every bed) are saying. Note that on all the lefty talk shows that expressed this position today -- and some never did -- many lefty callers called in to correct the host and argue with him or her about it.

    The broader context is that this ad, exploiting Obama the rock star, along with other negative ads, is seen by other, mainstream, lefties as indicating McCain has no definition of himself he can or chooses to offer Americans but instead just says he is "not Obama." Stressing one word in particular (by more than one person), numerous lefties I heard later today said McCain's problem is he doesn't offer an _affirmative_ presentation of what he offers Americans. That's true for the GOP overall, too, these days.
  • DLS
    "Another McCain flip-flop."

    I don't like that term, but it's well understood now. Critics on the right are now saying he's committed at least one that isn't merely that, but a sex-change operation.
  • fakemichelle
    I just read this blog entry and could not believe that I posted virtually the same response last night, http://www.notmichelleobama.blogspot.com. I completely agree that McCain's making a big deal out of Barack's celebrity status is a reach. But it is completely in line with the Rove strategy of trying to turn someone's positive's into negatives. The McCain camp's objective is to negate all of the positive that Barack created in the overseas visit. That was a big blow to McCain with Barack looking presidential and practically getting endorsed worldwide. They have done a great job of changing the conversation to something trivial and petty. I think the purpose of adding Britany and Paris to the video was to manipulate the media. They are not so much targeting Barack as they are targeting the media. They want the media talking about petty foolishness like a comparison of Barack to Britany, the race card adn other junk and not talking about Barack looking presidential.

    Unfortunately the media swallowed the bait and look at what is dominating the airwaves. They are wrapping the manipulating the media and not trashing Barack directly...they are leaving it to the media to discredit Barack by throwing out Britany and Paris bait for you guys to feed on.
  • etaner
    With regard to the CELEBRITY AD about Senator OBAMA, I can't help but think that something else is wrong with the ad: The Europeans' applause and jubilation about him is actually irrelevant to the American people. If OBAMA had achieved this applause in the US, then I would have said that Senator McCain was right in using and APPROVING THIS MESSAGE. The international aspect is wrong for the whole idea. WRONG!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC