An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Woes Befall A GOP Whore & Her Pimp

01aaaalberto_dick.jpg

GONZO AND MONICA: GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN

When George Bush heads back to his Texas ranch to search among the scrub brush for his squandered legacy, he will leave behind a Justice Department that resembles a Superfund site and the legacy of two attorneys general who willingly relinquished the office’s most precious asset — independence — in the service of partisan politics and helping enable the president’s historic power grab.

01aaagoodling.jpgSo inured have we become to Bush administration scandal that the latest of a long-running series of revelations this week by no less than Justice’s own Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility that the department was an adjunct of the Executive Branch and Republican National Committee barely caused a ripple.

To no one’s surprise, the IG and OPE concluded that Monica Goodling, a rabid Regent University soldier of God was a partisan whore who violated federal law by screening job applicants for career positions based on their political and ideological affiliations.

Jonathan Turley calls Goodling “a perfect political commissar.” If job applicants were not Republican enough, conservative enough and enamored enough of the president and his policies, as well as red-blood heterosexuals, they were shown the door.

In yet another instance of the mockery that Justice has made of its role in the so-called Global War on Terror, Goodling put the kibosh on hiring an experienced career terrorism prosecutor because of his wife’s politically incorrect affiliations. The job defaulted to a much more junior attorney who lacked any experience in counterterrorism and was not qualified for the position.

Perhaps the greatest barometer of the toxicity that has coursed through the halls of Justice is that nearly one year after he resigned, Goodling’s gigolo finds that he has something in common with many Americans: He can’t find a job.

Former attorneys general are highly sought-after, but Alberto Gonzales apparently hasn’t gotten so much as a nibble. His principal income has been giving a few talks before business groups and at colleges, including one where he was interrupted by protesters dressed as Guantánamo Bay detainees. Might this state of affairs have something to do with the fact that his greatest skill as the nation’s top lawyer was perjuring himself?

Gonzales may yet skate in the latest scandal because about all he can be blamed for is lousy oversight, but Goodling is looking like jail bait because of the detailed record of how she commandeered the department’s hiring process and forced out people who were not politically or sexually correct.

There would be a certain . . . er, justice in this because she rejected out of hand at least one applicant who was rumored to be a lesbian, and prison would be an excellent opportunity for her to learn first hand about sexual preferences.

Meanwhile, history will be a lot kinder to John Ashcroft, Bush’s first AG, than his enemies on the left have been.

While Ashcroft could be a conservative scold, he spoke out (privately) against some of the administration’s excesses and famously arose from his hospital sickbed to banish Gonzales and White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card when they tried to strong-arm him into agreeing to an extension of the Terrorist Surveillance Act.

Gonzales, of course, played dumb because he was, while Michael Mukasey is clever like a fox. The former federal judge rode to confirmation nine months ago promising to clean up the scandal-plagued department while deferring on whether he would confront the torture monster head on. He has, of course, been busily feeding the monster ever since.

Mukasey asserts that Justice already has adopted the recommendations of the IG and OPR in their Goodling report, and while that may be so, it misses the larger point — that it is his responsibility to root out the perps who remain on the payroll and not merely say it won’t happen again.

That is not likely to happen given that Bush’s third AG has been resistant to efforts to force Karl Rove and Harriet Miers to testify under oath on their roles in this and other partisan disgraces and already has squandered that most precious asset in proving himself to be yet another handmaiden to the president.

  • Neocon
    * According to our best information, 40 government officials were indicted or convicted in the wake of Watergate. There was a total of 31 Reagan era convictions, including 14 because of Iran-Contra and 16 in the Department of Housing & Urban Development scandal. 47 individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes with 33 of these occurring during the Clinton administration itself. There were in addition 61 indictments or misdemeanor charges. 14 persons were imprisoned. A key difference between the Clinton story and earlier ones was the number of criminals with whom he was associated before entering the White House.

    - Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47 - Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33 - Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61 - Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122

    Shuan give us a number on the current administration??
  • superdestroyer
    I wonder if anyone will call out Shaun for his endorsement of prison rape. Given how leftist most of the posters on a "moderate voice" blog are, I doubt that anyone will let political correctness stand in the way of partisan politics.

    At least Shaun has given every conservative posters at The Moderate Voice something to use to prove that liberals do not really mean what they say.

    Of course, I doubt Shaun will see the irony of the left's endorsement of affirmative action, racial preferences, racial set asides, and racial quotas as being in conflict with the complaints about the hiring practices at the Department of Justice. The left has long said that qualifications do not mean as much as political correctness. I also doubt that Shaun will see the irony of Democratic lawyers being treated the same way as Republican graduate students and post docs are treated in academia.
  • christoofar
    Unfortunately the number of individuals in the Bush Administration who deserve criminal trials seem to be able to leave the country, refuse to testify, or plead "Executive Privilege", or their buddy W pardons them (after scapegoating them first, of course) . Not to mention a Congress with no backbone to do anything about it. The Teflon Administration will be Bush's legacy.
    Sorry, I missed the part where Shaun "endorses prison rape", but then some here have very deft interpretive skills.
  • superdestroyer
    CTF,

    That would be the quote

    "There would be a certain . . . er, justice in this because she rejected out of hand at least one applicant who was rumored to be a lesbian, and prison would be an excellent opportunity for her to learn first hand about sexual preferences.

    I find it odd that Democrats always seem to be able to interpret Republican short hand (Good American = republicans) but never able to interpret their own short hand.
  • shaun
    EDITOR'S NOTE: A reader far more savvy about the Oldest Profession than I points out in a private email to me that Gonzalez was Goodling's pimp and not his gigolo, so the head has been charged. The reader further points out Gonzalez is Bush's gigolo.
  • Of course, I doubt Shaun will see the irony of the left's endorsement of affirmative action, racial preferences, racial set asides, and racial quotas as being in conflict with the complaints about the hiring practices at the Department of Justice.

    "What is it about George Bush that makes you want to serve him?"

    And if your wife/husband is a Democrat, consider yourself out of the running for the job.
  • JSpencer
    Frankly I'd be more than a little embarrassed to select sad examples like Cheney and Gonzales as being worthy of my defense. Afterall, there are so many good Americans out there who really give a crap about the country, and not just about power grabbing and subverting the spirit of the USC. Nothing destroys objectivity like blind faith in ideology.
  • jwest
    When people want to know what a democrat is like, I point them to Shaun.
  • shaun
    jwest:

    Who would have to point them to someone else since I reliably vote for more Republicans than Democrats.
  • superdestroyer
    Chris,

    How is asking about serving George Bush really different than first tier universities forcing students to write students about how they overcame being a poor black child or forcing high schools to perform politically correct "volunteer work" in order to be considered for admission.

    How is what the Republicans did different than the politically correct brain washing that the University of Delware attempted.

    I agree that political tests are wrong and should never be used. I just wished that those on the left agreed instead of saying that they are OK for colleges, universities, and government contractors but not OK for lawyers at the justice department.
  • jwest
    Shaun,

    I’m sorry, my mistake.

    I thought I saw you at the campaign headquarters while I was going door to door for Kucinich For President.
  • shaun
    jwest:

    In fairness, my reply should be a little more detailed: I generally vote for Democrats for Congress and president, although I have not done so in two of the last six presidential elections and three of the last five elections for my senators and congressfolk. I generally vote for Republicans for state and local offices for the same reason I generally vote for Democrats for Congress and president -- the party fields a better grade of candidate.
  • RememberNovember
    GWB has his very own Monica. How about that.
  • How is asking about serving George Bush really different than first tier universities forcing students to write students about how they overcame being a poor black child or forcing high schools to perform politically correct "volunteer work" in order to be considered for admission.

    My white friends and I (also white) had no trouble getting into first class universities. The vast majority of my classes and friend's classes were white.
  • superdestroyer
    ChrisWWW,

    Since your liberal, I would assume that your fit the politically correct model for white students. The real question is whether a white kid with strong religious, conservative, or libertarian leanings has a chance of being accepted at most universities. I would guess they would only if they hide the fact. I doubt that an college admission essay about being a Republican volunteer would help getting into any top tier university. However, I would bet that the Ivy leagues will be overloaded with essays about volunteering for the Obama campaign.

    also, whites at the Ivy leagues are admitted at about their percentage of the overall population of high school students. Asians are massively overrepresented, blacks (due to affirmative action) seem to be slightly less than their percentage and Hispanics are underrepresented.
  • SD,
    For the record, I would ban legacy admissions at all universities that get public funds or tax breaks. Second, I would put more money into need based scholarships. That is all ;-)
  • DLS
    Shaun, what are you going to do when your excuse(s) for overreaction (to say the very least and to be extremely accomodating here) are no longer in or near the White House?

    Chris -- good education policy (provided the money is state and local, not federal and also that you'd consider ending nepotism in all-privately-funded schools, too).
  • kritt11
    "Unfortunately the number of individuals in the Bush Administration who deserve criminal trials seem to be able to leave the country, refuse to testify, or plead "Executive Privilege", or their buddy W pardons them (after scapegoating them first, of course) . Not to mention a Congress with no backbone to do anything about it. The Teflon Administration will be Bush's legacy."

    Yes this is true-- they may have been inept at governing, but they excelled at stonewalling-- and skirting the law. Reagan was also known as the "teflon president" because he remained untouched by Iran-Contra even after he admitted he knew what was going on. There are many in both administrations who learned from Watergate how to seize unlawful executive power and avoid prison time. (Cheney in particular)
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC