An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Why Is John McCain Acting So Desperate?

01aaamccain_german.jpg

Obama spoke to 200,000 Germans, McCain spoke at a German restaurant

The desperation of John McCain — ranging from character attacks to outright lies to repeated shifts on the issues — is symptomatic of a candidate scrambling to keep his head above water a few days before an election, not 15 weeks out.

Speaking of 15 weeks, it has been about that long since McCain sewed up the Republican nomination. And yet that all-important turning of the corner — the moment when everything falls into place and a campaign is running on all cylinders — remains elusive. In fact, last week was easily the worst for McCain since his last primary challenger dropped out.

This sad state of affairs is the result of two realities: McCain would be a weak candidate in any election year, but he has been rendered weaker still because of the albatross of George Bush and a cascade of bad news at home and abroad that is beyond his control. Meanwhile, Barack Obama is a strong if not fully rounded candidate who has the wind at his back because that news plays to his advantage. .

* * * * *

McCain’s attempts to put lipstick on his pig of a campaign have been so inadequate that they border on the pathetic, and a consequence has been an inextricable slide into the only alternative he and his advisers believe to be available — Rovian smear politics.

What else to call McCain’s TV ad claiming that Obama “made time to go to the gym, but canceled a visit with wounded troops”? The truth, of course, is that the Pentagon would not allow such visits because it viewed them as campaign appearances, while the ad actually shows him meeting with troops. In a gym.

What else to call other swipes saying that Obama would commit treason to win the election? Or linking him to everyone from Hamas to Castro to Ahmadinejad? Or that he is responsible for high gas prices?

As it is, McCain’s extensive media buys have not resulted in even a tiny bump in the polls, which leads me to believe that while many people are not focused on the campaign, those who are have pretty much made up their minds.

* * * * *

When all is said and done, this election is about the future and about change, and McCain fails on both accounts.

McCain’s call for a new round of tax cuts is laughable in the face of a record federal deficit. His cure for America’s energy woes is a regurgitated version of the president’s. His prescription for health-care reform borders on the draconian, while his positions on Iraq and Afghanistan have morphed into pretty fair imitations of Obama’s in key respects.

The election is Obama’s to lose. He still could do so and certainly has a way to go to convince me that he would be a credible president. But while the upstart from Illinois barnstormed Middle Eastern and European capitals looking presidential, the septuagenarian was busily popping sour grapes and acting like a grouchy grandfather who can’t get the grandkids to obey him while his posse of neocon and big-business advisers busily whispered in his ear about what to say and do next.

Saddest of all, he has abandoned any pretense of occupying the high ground with an increasingly dignity-free campaign that is a reminder that a McCain presidency would be the same old same old.

  • Neocon
    Its all perception. Actually last week was one of McCains best and yesterday was the coup de gra.

    Barak Obama and his wife Michelle unveiled their "Lets turn America socialist" platform and once this hits the streets the moderates and the GOP will get in gear. What a bad move on the part of a senator that continues to astound me by the stupidity of his handlers who are incoherent when it comes to a presidential election.

    They just gave the GOP and the moderates and independents the ammo they needed to get off their duffs and become involved in defeating an obviously far left and darn near socialist candidate.

    The budget deficit is going to be 500 billion in the hole and the day that comes out he introduces 250 billion dollars of new spending............good job.
  • superdestroyer
    Neocon,

    Not only is the programs an additional $250 billion in spending but they are job killers. The only groups that will benefit from the Michelle Obama must be obeyed program are small,minority owned businesses who employ only extended family members. They will be able to dodge most of the required of She Who Must Be Obeyed but it will give them a huge competitive advantage relative to businesses that follow the rules.

    However, since there no real comeback for the McCain disaster, a safer prediction will be that corruption will increase at a rapid pace. With one party controlling all levels of the government and elections being pointless, people will have to take issues into their own hands. Look at the $56 Billion business have not paid the IRS in the last ten years. Thus number is increase quickly under the new regulatory requirements of the coming Obama Administration.

    As I keep asking, what business would a bright, eager young entrepreneur want to go into when looking at the coming regulations of the Obama. Administration. Looking the proposed regulations for employment, it would have to be something with no employees. Looking at the coming greenhouse gas regulations, it can use no energy. Unless a young businessman is a minority and can qualify for a government contract, I cannot see any place where growth will happen in the private sector for small businesses.
  • Manchester2
    Yesterday, polls showed McCain in the lead. Your post makes no mention of this inconvenient fact.
  • shaun
    Manchester2:

    That poll is widely viewed as an outlier. Obama is ahead by 3-10 points in other polls.
  • Marlowecan
    Shaun said: "As it is, McCain’s extensive media buys have not resulted in even a tiny bump in the polls..."

    As Manchester notes, McCain was leading among "likely voters" yesterday...and Obama's "bounce" from Europe totally disappeared. Shaun takes no notice of this. Clearly, the majority of Americans do not swoon for Europeans' approval as do American liberals and the MSM.

    SD: Hahahahaha...man, you seem pretty depressed about the future. Hey, even if Obama is a Super-Carter, it will do wonders for American conservatism.

    That said: I must agree with Shaun however that the McCain campaign has been disastrous. I have lost count of the number of conservatives I have heard who agree on that point. Is McCain too egotistical to accept advice?

    Thus, I think that while Obama might lose...as things look today...it won't be because McCain won. It will be because Obama makes people uneasy.

    I would argue the Obama campaign recognizes this. Obama is going out of his way to stress strength and security: Look at the FISA vote...the Israel speech...Obama's tough talk with the Germans about their contributing to fighting terrorism (THAT did not go over well in Germany at all...they liked Obama's image, but not his words).
  • daveinboca
    Shaun has quaffed lotsa the Obamanable Showman's Kool-Aid, it seems. I am counting on "likely" voters & the mysterious Bradley Effect to narrow the gap even more or actually give McCain the edge.

    Noisy bloggers & delusional Dems think this one's in the bag, but that is always their Achilles heel. They actually believe their own hype.
  • dave,
    Feel comfortable in the company of all those racist a**holes?
  • timr
    Neocon, just what reality do you live in, Second Life? Your idea of what is going on in the US is ....... Repubs in jail, going to jail, or just getting out of jail. repubs being investigated for the Abramoff affair-Remember him? It is still-slowly, oh so slowly(but the bush doj is coming to an end, so that investigation is going to pick up steam) going forward, then there is corruption in Ak-stevens and young. 30 some repubs "retiring", and a pick up in 3 special elections by the dems as the repubs could not even keep hasterts seat. No, the current repub party is bankrupt, morally and fiscally-someone absconded with mondo $$ from what was supposed to be campaign funds, no?. And then there is that really great fundraising company that raises money for repubs in dem districts that they can't possibly win. Hundreds of thousands collected, then 95% goes to the company that set it up. This is a big repub scam, one that keeps draining the pockets of the rush ditto head nation-keep it up I say. Yep, the repub party is totally bankrupt, putting up a 72 year old man for pres. The only thing he has going for him is the fact that his real base is the MSM. They cover up his lies and gaffes, never report on the numbers of lobbyists that actually run his campaign. If a bad story does leak out, his buds on the strait talk bus will kill it before the start of the next news cycle. And yet, and yet, in spite of all this, you really believe that the repubs will stage some kind of a comeback in 08. What are you ingesting? What possible worldview can you have that simply ignores all the things that are scaring the crap out of most americans about st. john? The mind simply boggles.
  • Silhouette
    One thing people conveniently keep forgetting is that McCain isn't some lonely entity acting randomly this way and that...seemingly looking weak. McCain has BigOil strategists working with him 24/7.

    The german restaurant while Obama was in Germany was no misstep, it was planned. It was planned. Think about why sharp and "we will not lose" BigOil strategists would PLAN a misstep?

    When you plug in the Obama trap and the pitfall they have waiting for him just after the convention, ensuring that he looks electable next to McCain is a MUST.

    Clinton is a wildcard BigOil will not tolerate. They know precisely what another Clinton administration will mean. With what they have on Obama, he'll never make it to the Oval Office. They know full well that if the democrats nominate Hillary Clinton, her defeat against McCain (them) would be one of the largest landslides in US history.

    BigOil is McCain and BigOil has been craftily carving politics since before most of you were born.

    Misstep my hiney.
  • Manchester2
    Silhouette, why do you keep posting as if Senator Clinton is the presumptive nominee, and not Senator Obama? Do you honestly think that delegates committed to him will switch at the convention?
  • vwcat
    the one thing that has hurt McCain the most is his abandoning of his 2000 self as a maverick who is ready to buck the establishment for what is right.
    He is so desperate to be president and his personal dislike of Obama is apparent. But, he is letting these and his temper control him and his campaign.
    On the other hand, Obama has an excellent and disciplined campaign staff and Obama is running a smart and effective campaign.
    You may not be convinced but, you look at the way the two candidates run their campaigns and you see what kind of presidents they will be and how their white house would be run.
    Frankly, Obama is a very impressive candidate.
  • I'm very disappointed at how McCain has changed. In the first Republican debate, I thought he was a refreshing change from all of those other white guys up on the stage. But once he clinched the nomination, he started cozying up to the conservatives, and his whole "maverick" image started ringing a little hollow. Admittedly, despite what some Democrats are saying, a McCain administration wouldn't be the third term of Georgie Boy, but I'm disturbed by how much he's changed from earlier in the election.
  • vwcat
    Silhouette, you are indeed nuts.
    Hillary is in the senate and will stay there. She lost, if you have not noticed. She is not the nominee and will not be.
    Grow up.
  • vwcat
    Pattonguy, he would not be like Bush, but, McCain is disturbing in many ways.
    He use to be acceptable to democrats way back when but, after his makeover this election, he is like Bush in one important way: He is showing himself to be incompetent.
  • DLS
    "What a bad move on the part of a senator that continues to astound me by the stupidity of his handlers who are incoherent when it comes to a presidential election."

    He'll say it was a mistake, or overreach, and we won't hear any more about it until after the election. Obama's team learns from its blunders.

    * * *

    "Shaun has quaffed lotsa the Obamanable Showman's Kool-Aid, it seems."

    It's more like an extension of Bush-bashing (although McCain is not another Bush; only fools believe this) and Move On-style anti-war neurosis (which is why he long ago adopted Obama and was among the most vicious Clinton-bashing Obamaniacs).
  • Neocon
    * According to our best information, 40 government officials were indicted or convicted in the wake of Watergate. There was a total of 31 Reagan era convictions, including 14 because of Iran-Contra and 16 in the Department of Housing & Urban Development scandal. 47 individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes with 33 of these occurring during the Clinton administration itself. There were in addition 61 indictments or misdemeanor charges. 14 persons were imprisoned. A key difference between the Clinton story and earlier ones was the number of criminals with whom he was associated before entering the White House.

    - Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47 - Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33 - Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61 - Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122

    It was no differernt the predeeding 8 years under Clinton then during this 8 years under Bush. This time however we are going to elect an American or a German endorsed Socialist.

    The choice is ours. Now if we can just find out how much foreign money Obama is accepting just like the amount Bill Clinton Accepted then we will know who pulls Obama's strings.
  • runasim
    McCain used to be someone I respected, even though I disagreed more than agreed with him.
    Already in his debates with Romney, he showed signs of hitting below the belt, but this is something new altogether.

    The worst of it is that I suspect this is the real Mccain coming out, giving a preview of what a Pres. McCain would be.
    It's a big disappointment and a big turn-off.
  • Rambie
    SD, "The only groups that will benefit from the Michelle Obama must be obeyed program are ..."

    Wow, going after the wife already there SD? You must be getting desperate. Your doom-and-gloom for the republican party predictions are getting as old as Sil's.

    McCain has slowly slid from the maverick into just another republican clone by reversing himself on multiple issues. He's backtracked on so many issues including running a clean campaign with his new attitude of character assassination ads that I'm finding it hard to trust what he says.

    Would he be as bad as Bush? Probably not, but he seems headed in that direction.

    I'm not saying he can't win, this looks to be another tight election.
  • HappySurge
    You know, a lot of times, I read the posts here, and I think 'well, this is gonna get hit with bias', and with Shaun, we always know where he stands. The thing is, he has the benefit of being correct on the facts. When I see the posters respond to this, particularly neocon and superdestroyer and DLS in a way that I could write up on their behalf, I can't help but think they might be trolls. Because, I can't imagine that anyone can look at America now and see the failures of the Bush administration as just a mass media creation. Our country, its dollar, its military, and a lot of its future has been destroyed by this President, and his policies, and John McCain wants to further those policies.

    The only hope with John McCain was that while he agreed with these policies, he might be more competent at carrying them out. That's it. That's damage control, essentially. What I'm asking is, if you're not trolls, how can you deal with supporting and being apologists for the people and policies that have spent, and will continue to spend, years destroying our country in their actions. I mean, I just can't imagine having a Democratic President who put their principles and plans in place, and it all collapsed, and the country was clearly rotting out from itself because of it, and me going 'no, no, see, this is why this guy is awesome!' And that's essentially what you're doing. I don't understand it.

    So, I'm honestly asking: are you guys just trolls or do you mean it? And if you mean it, where have you been living? I live in a town that is disproportionately Republican because it's got more elderly middle class whites than most. But it's been a long time since I've seen anyone say how great this country is doing, or how we're headed to the right place or how easy it is to heat their homes, or get to and from work, or live their lives with the gambit thrown on them.

    I just don't understand it. I get how you could not like liberal policies, but I don't have a remote understanding of how you can support policies and people that have done this much damage to the country. I mean, when you look at your fellow citizens, don't you see any pain in them, aren't you shaken at all by it? I don't understand, unless you spent your life with blinders on, how you could think the way you do, and support the policies you support in the face of such clear and absolute failure.
  • Neocon
    So now its simply down to two things.........A moderate McCain who does not really have much support from the GOP or a Socialist Obama who has the full weight and support of the Democratic machine behind his back waiting for their turn in the cookie jar.

    The choice is becoming more and more easy to make. Socialism or Capitalism.

    The Democrats have had decades to fix the poor. They have NOT........WHY? Because if YOU FIX IT THEY DONT NEED YOU ANYMORE.

    Haven't you guys figured this out yet? They are not going to fix the poor. They will get in office and then pretend to try and blame it on the GOP and then after 8 years they will be back on the streets and then convince everyone that because the poor are still poor that its the GOP's fault.

    The difference is that the GOP does not pander to the poor. They pander to the rich and corporations which give jobs and healthcare. They make no bones about it. They want free enterprise to give jobs and healthcare.

    The GOP takes care of their constituents............The Democrats DO NOT. They just complain and whine and bellyache and then get thrown out because they know fixing the poor is putting them out of a job.

    The democrats scream foul and demand welfare for all. Yet then when given the chance............they dont do it. They fail.

    Simply because fixing the poor would put them out of a job.

    And just Think how close this election is with McCain bumbling around as you put it. Wait till the RNC gets energized and gets behind him and gets it rolling and nothing energizes the left more then a far left candidate unveiling once again "socialist America programs" like Obama just did.
  • DLS
    Happy[ ]Surge. Get your facts correct next time. Thanks in advance. Shaun is an incessent Bush-basher and blatant Obama campaigner and McCain copycat basher.

    This is an anti-GOP year and everyone who is awake and aware knows it.

    Ted Stevens (senior GOP Senator) has been indicted on federal corruption charges. Don Young is also under investigation. At least one Senate seat (for Alaska) may end up going Democratic this year, to add to the GOP carnage.
  • daveinboca
    Neocon, excellent diagnosis of the fatal illness with which the Dems are infecting the American way of life.

    Socialism, even the benevolent EU-nuch variety, has never worked except in countries of less than 10 million people with a strong work ethic [Scandanavia]. I laughed when Ted Koppel was told by a PRC businessman that China is the most capitalist country in the world---and one might notice that millions of jobs are being created each year in the PRC.

    You're right. Read "The Forgotten Man" by Amity Schlaes & see how the Dems went off the rails in the thirties. All the usual narrative is largely agitprop about recent American history, and now we are being told that Obama will fix it.

    "Change" isn't always good & the EU-nuchs like Obama because he will destroy American paramountcy in the world economy [still 27% of the planet's GNP according to The Economist]
  • DLS
    "Ted Stevens (senior GOP Senator)"

    * * *

    "the Dems went off the rails in the thirties"

    Tax and tax, spend and spend, elect and elect.

    They went even farther off the rails in the Sixties.

    By the Seventies this nation was in terrible shape. Not Hartmann's lefty heaven.

    Wanting to take us back to that is sheer idiocy.

    But at least in the Thirties we didn't get European totalitarianism because, fortunately, we're not Europeans. We (or at least many of us, still) aren't used to being treated simply as a herd of livestock and we don't willingly submit to an elite with unquestioned acceptance of authority and power. Not all of us, at least.
  • DLS
    "I get how you could not like liberal policies, but I don't have a remote understanding of how you can support policies and people that have done this much damage to the country."

    If you read and understood what some of us have written, you would notice that we're critical of Bush. It doesn't follow from legitimate, sensible criticism of liberal excesses that have failed in the past, that those of us doing that must necessarily be pro-Republican (you definitely have not been reading what I post) or pro-Bush.
  • Socialism versus Capitalism

    How neatly you summarize a choice that is not before us. Where has socialism worked? Who cares? Where has unfettered capitalism worked? Who knows? But the countries in which it has been tried have very well demonstrated the effects of so-called "free market" capitalism. Indonesia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, South Africa, Korea, China, Russia, Iran, Bolivia and others. All received economic "makeovers" according to the prescriptions of the very "free-market" gurus worshiped by the neocon right: Milton Friedman, Ronald Reagan, Margret Thatcher and the so-called "Chicago boys" of the Chicago School of Economics. The result has been consistent. Massive increases in poverty with the removal of the social safety net, and massive increases of wealth for those at the top.

    This is the universal and unwavering result from a shift of public resources into private hands and the transfer of private debt to the public. We have seen this in the last eight years in this country: privatization of war making and disaster relief has enriched cronies of the GOP including Halliburton, Blackwater, Bechtel and the other 20,000 contractors who are nursing at the public teat. Now the bad economic policies of the GOP has hammered our economy and the dollar, and we are acquiring the private debt through bailouts. That's the GOP "free-market" plan.

    It's especially interesting that you raised China as an example. After Tiananmen Square, "free-market" policies made billionaires of the former Communist leaders, who are currently 90% of Chinese billionaires. They're called the "princelings." For Chinese workers, it is the embodiment of the conservative economic dream: no unions, no time off, no job security and no minimum wage. They work for slave wages at dangerous jobs to support the "princelings." Environmental regulations? Zero, just what the neocons want for America. Yes, China is a perfect example of what the neocons want for America: most of us living in abject poverty while the powerful and moneyed few wallow in wealth.

    As for the claims being made here about what would happen under "socialist" Obama? It all sounds so familiar. During Clinton's presidency, Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey made exactly the same predictions: that Clinton's economic policies would massively increase unemployment, deficit and debt. They were totally, completely and absolutely WRONG. No, it has been the Republican "free market" reforms that have decimated jobs, ballooned the federal budget, destroyed the American dollar and compromised the future of our children.

    I believe your view of "capitalism" is nothing more than Neo-feudalism, and I assume that those of you so enamored of it expect to be the "princelings" of America and not its huddled masses.
  • runasim
    "I believe your view of "capitalism" is nothing more than Neo-feudalism, and I assume that those of you so enamored of it expect to be the "princelings" of America and not its huddled masses."

    That's exactly it. Fantasy vs facts and reality.
    Slogans vs understanding.

    That's how poor working class Americans elected Bush, and some still believe his pseudo economics in spite of the evidnece in their own pocketbooks.
    .
    It's aother form of the 9/11 conspiracy maniacs. Delusions.
  • Neocon
    I will only say again. LBJ embarked upon unfettered social programs to banish poverty and what happened?

    The democrats continue to believe that there is nirvana if they just had the right amount of money. The problem is that if you solve the poors problems what happens to them?

    They become Republicans. Man wants to be upwardly mobile. The Democrats do not want that. Thus it is they who are equally at fault for keeping them in their poor economic chains.

    Secondly if you must embark upon a college thesis to out line why Capitalism vs Socialism is not relevant in this circumstance then you have lost about 90 percent of the people who you would try to convince, because you know what?

    They don't care. Only You care. You and your textbook definitions of social theory does not get policies in place to turn the poor into productive Republicans.
  • Neocon
    That's how poor working class Americans elected Bush, and some still believe his pseudo economics in spite of the evidnece in their own pocketbooks.

    Do you really believe that the GOP cares about the poor? They care about their constituents. The GOP cares about those who vote them in office. Just as the democrats care about those that vote them in office.

    However have you ever wondered why the democrats agree to tax cuts for the RICH? Might it be because they ARE ALL MILLIONAIRES. But hey they love the poor and are going to cure their ailments if they can.

    Right. Delusions? Not I but perhaps you guys or gals.

    The democrats dont care about the poor. They just use them to get elected. If you have problems with poverty you should really look at the party who is dedicated to irradicating poverty instead of at the party whose goal is to provide jobs and a consumer driven free market system that benefits almost all.

    You direct your wrath at the wrong party Runasim. Why you and yours continue to rail against the GOP for not giving you more food stamps is beyond me.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC