An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

(Updated) An Unhappy McCain Discovers That The Law of Gravity Has Not Been Repealed

01aaaobama_petreus.jpg

Some pundits are referring to events this week in Iraq as John McCain’s “Waterloo.” That may or may not be true, but it misses a larger point: While the Bush administration has done plenty of end runs around the Constitution, it was unable to repeal the law of gravity and the consequences of its excesses were bound to come crashing down sooner or later. As the president’s handmaiden, McCain was going to get bonked.

Mind you, Barack Obama was nothing if not clever in looking ahead and toward McCain even while he was still battling it out with Whatshername. The agility of he and his staff has enabled him to run circles around a septuagenarian who is stumbling from crisis to crisis and still can’t get his own house in order nearly five months after he secured the Republican nomination.

Among all of the lousy decisions that McCain’s campaign has made, challenging Obama to a game of mano-a-mano by visiting Afghanistan and Iraq surely is the worst.

It is obvious that no one in the McCain camp considered what might happen if Obama accepted his challenge, let alone that the situation on the ground in both hot spots was trending toward validating the Democrat’s policy positions and away from the artifice of the Bush administration and by extension McCain himself.

That situation is made worse by the very whining, much of it directed at the media, from McCain and his surrogates that Phil Gramm decried before he was cashiered. But when he does get coverage — most recently his latest vacillations on Iraq and over-the-top claim that Obama would rather win the election than the war — he suddenly cancels his press availability.

As it is, McCain caught an enormous break from that selfsame media while Obama and Hillary Clinton were slugging it out, but squandered that opportunity to grow his campaign organization and fine tune his policy positions. Judging from McCain’s campaign schedule, he still seems more focused on getting money than votes.

* * * * *

The scene in the photograph above did not happen by accident and is a huge gift for Obama. It is sure to be a part of every post-Election Day media slideshow chronicling how a black junior senator from Illinois came out of nowhere, vanquished a war-hero challenger and ended the Republican hegemony in Washington.

Obama was part of an official Senate delegation for the first two stops of his overseas trip, and General Petraeus was obligated to take him for flyover of the war zone. But the photo has become an overnight classic — the handsome president in waiting and his rugged Centcom commander in waiting captured in profile. You can almost hear them conversing about the rough road ahead over the thump-thump-thump of the chopper blades.

As it is, Obama is unproven on foreign policy and national security, but Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki administered the coup d’grace to McCain in endorsing Obama’s withdrawal plan as substantially similar to his own in a major magazine interview only hours before Obama set down in the Green Zone where he was accorded a red-carpet reception.

From there it was on to Jordan, Israel and the Palestinian territories and then what from all accounts will be a tumultuous welcome in Germany, a big wet kiss from Nicholas Sarkozy, the French president and Obama’s equal as an orator, and a London flyby, where the Tories owe their ascendancy to the failings of Tony Blair, who was accurately ridiculed in the U.K. as George Bush’s poodle.

Obama is sure to get a modest bump from his most excellent overseas adventure. But it is sure to be a summer of discontent for McCain supporters if the best he can do in the interim is a lame new TV commercial blaming his opponent for record-high gas prices because he supports a congressional off-shore drilling ban while everyone with a ExxonMobil credit card knows that prices have been trending upward for a decade.

Picking a running mate should give McCain some attention, but before you can say “gas tax holiday” the Democrats will convene in Denver for Obama’s coronation in a packed football stadium and then the Republicans in Minneapolis where the big story will be how much face time that Bush the Party Pariah will be given.

* * * * *

So it may be after Labor Day before McCain can get a significant word in edgewise. Then come the presidential debates, a showdown that will give him chest pains since Obama on his worst day can eat the addled McCain’s rhetorical lunch on his best day. (Memo to McCain: Somalia is not Sudan, Iraq and Afghanistan do not share a border, Czechoslovakia went out of business 15 years ago and the Packers play in Green Bay, not the Steelers.)

And all the while Afghanistan will be hemorrhaging, the economy will continue to tank and the trickle of revelations about torture and other administration excesses will become a torrent as the countdown to the end of Bush’s reign of error begins in earnest.

Is it possible that Obama will coast to victory through a combination of luck and spunk and without really having to prove that he is up to the job? Yes, especially if McCain keeps stabbing himself in the back and getting bonked on the head with the rotten apples falling from Bush’s tree.

  • superdestroyer
    I see that Shaun is up to this SOP when posting. Talk about McCain while using a picture of Senator Obama. Nitpick Senator McCain while refusing to discuss the policy proposals of Senator Obama. The only thing that is missing are the words GITMO and Cheney.

    If Shaun wanted to really question Senator Obama, he may want to ask how Senator Obama is willing to reconcile is long desire to abandon Iraq while wanting to double down in Afghanistan. Is there anything that can be called an "Obama Doctrine" that would explain Senator Obama's position on Iraq, Afghanistan, Darfur, and Zimbabwe. I cannot see how you can apply a single doctrine and get Senator Obama's position.

    Also, I doubt that Shaun will use the term DEmocratic hegemony after January 20 when the Democrats control all parts of the government. Of course, for someone who covered politics in PHiladelphia, having the Democrats in change of everything will feel like home.
  • daveinboca
    Whew, someone has been chug-a-lugging the Kool-Aid by the gallon to write this upside-down view of things. Obama says he is still against the surge even though it worked & it's McCain's Waterloo? Wow!

    Obama can't speak without a teleprompter & when he goes ad-lib, he becomes a gasbag of hemming & hawing. McCain is better off the cuff than Obama even on Johnny Mac's bad days. Listen to the montage of uhs & hmms that Rush put together of Obama's backing & forthing to get a picture of a confused young man way over his head.

    This post is full of more cheap shots & spin-cycle nitwittery than most & McCain should remind Obama that 57 states are way too many to campaign in.

    And someone should really ask Obama what he thought about Ryan Lizza's New Yorker article & how he's going to pay back his friend Rezko.
  • While there is room for debate on some of these points, Shaun is certainly correct on one point. Obama is currently the recipient of an avalanche of gifts largely not of his own making. McCain's daring him to go overseas is turning into a monumental mistake, and it's doubtful that Maliki consulted with Barack's staff before tying John McCain's shoelaces together. If Obama doesn't get a noticable bump in the polls next week, he has a problem. Events could not conspire more effectively to push him into a good position.
  • Don Quijote
    Obama can't speak without a teleprompter & when he goes ad-lib, he becomes a gasbag of hemming & hawing.


    I don't remember Republicans & Conservatives having a problem with Shrub's language, a man who can't put a sentence together to save his life.
  • superdestroyer
    Don_Quijote, Everytime a conservative poster ever uses the term "Clinton did it too" the left of center bloggers attack the person as an apologist for the Bush Admnistration. some I doubt if anyone if going to point out that you are acting as an apologist for the Obama Administration six months before it starts.

    If Senator Obama is not every good answering question, then the left should not feel the need to excuse his poor performance. They should have realize that this is how Senator Obama actually is when he said that he is not a detail guy.
  • Neocon
    –To recognize, accept and cater to the reality (as Rudy Giuliani would say) that most Americans care more about the price at the pump, their mortgages, and their food and health care costs then about McCain’s life story, prescience on the surge, or total number of trips made to Iraq.

    Why is it the Democats have painted McCain as Bush's handmaiden, heir to the throne, Bush Jr. When in fact these two people hate each other and McCain hardly has worked lockstep with Bush on anything.

    Talk about a nice talking point.
  • DLS
    "Why is it the Democats have painted McCain as Bush's handmaiden, heir to the throne, Bush Jr. When in fact these two people hate each other and McCain hardly has worked lockstep with Bush on anything.

    Talk about a nice talking point."


    It's the Big Lie and there are plenty of suckers (Dem votes) who will believe whatever they're told. Plus it's another excuse to bash Bush along with be obscessed in a Move-On anti-war and hypocritical manner with Obama.
  • DLS
    "I see that Shaun is up to this SOP when posting"

    He's been foolish again, but you should have heard the fools on lefty talk radio yesterday evening gushing about what class and mastery of foreign policy and ability to walk on water and perform other miracles the Messiah Obama has.
  • DLS
    "chug-a-lugging the Kool-Aid by the gallon"

    Obama is not just their Messiah. He is the anti-Bush!
  • daveinboca
    The DNC affiiliate called the MSM [Fox & WSJ excepted] has moved lockstep to cover Obama's wrong-footed misstatements on the surge & his illogical misspeaking on how he was against the surge & it only worked because of some Sunni dudes in Anbar---notice how the lefty cream puff leaves out any credit for the US forces in-country? It's called magical thinking and is the basis of Dem foreign policy since James Earl Carter embraced symbolism over diplomacy.

    This guy is NOT ready for prime time. Give him a pass in '08 & maybe he'll grow up by 2012.
  • I see that Shaun is up to this SOP when posting. Talk about McCain while using a picture of Senator Obama.

    Could you even come up with a lamer criticism than that?

    If Shaun wanted to really question Senator Obama, he may want to ask how Senator Obama is willing to reconcile is long desire to abandon Iraq while wanting to double down in Afghanistan.

    I'll take a stab at it. Afghanistan & Pakistan is where Al Qaeda is (remember 9/11?). Iraq is not.

    . Obama says he is still against the surge even though it worked & it's McCain's Waterloo? Wow!

    Is Obama *still* against the Surge? Did it actually work given its stated goals? And if it did work, why is McCain still insisting that withdrawal equals defeat? McCain's Iraq position is full of simplifications and contradictions.

    On the other hand, Obama's Iraq position is now supported by the US public, the Iraqi public and the Iraqi government.

    Obama can't speak without a teleprompter & when he goes ad-lib, he becomes a gasbag of hemming & hawing. McCain is better off the cuff than Obama even on Johnny Mac's bad days.

    And McCain can't even manage to crack a genuine smile without looking like Frankenstein. None of that really matters does it? What does matter is that more people support the policies of Obama than McCain.

    If we put any stock in the idea that running a successful campaign is akin to running the government, then Obama is lightyears ahead of McCain by that criteria.

    Obama is currently the recipient of an avalanche of gifts largely not of his own making.

    The Iraqi government's endorsement of Obama's withdrawal plan was inevitable if the Iraqi government was at all concerned about their own public's opinion. It's not luck that Obama has chosen the position supported by a majority of Iraqis and Americans. He's made his own luck.

    If Senator Obama is not every good answering question, then the left should not feel the need to excuse his poor performance. They should have realize that this is how Senator Obama actually is when he said that he is not a detail guy.

    If he "ummms" and "ermmms" sometimes, that's not the end of the world. In the end he still has more of a grasp on policy than John McCain who admitted he doesn't know anything about the economy and who repeatedly says he'll leave the decisions about Iraq up to General Petraeus.

    Why is it the Democats have painted McCain as Bush's handmaiden, heir to the throne, Bush Jr. When in fact these two people hate each other and McCain hardly has worked lockstep with Bush on anything.

    Because they have the same position on Iraq, tax cuts, torture, warrantless wiretapping, executive power, energy, etc. And they also employ the same people to do their campaign dirty work. Like Karl Rove.
  • runasim
    I'm glad Shaun noticed the whining character of McCain's reaction to Obama's trip.

    The word 'fair' has even been resurrected. This is peculiar, because for the Rght, the concept of fairness has traditionally and vocifefoursly been the encapsulation of everything evil. it's socialism, it's anti free marekts, it's anti- democratic.

    The media haven't been fair since they became corporate HQs. For at leat 8 years, the media have been the mouthpieces for Bush's WH and the GOP.

    Suddenly, McCain disovers that the media aren't fair. He has to cut down on his napping times. .
  • joegandelman
    It'd really be more interesting and relevant on blogs if people commented on the actual issues people raise in their writing rather than going after the writers. It gets tiresome. Also, to give you a hint: someone in comments making an argument you didn't quite consider before can influence a writer in a future post or article. If people just decide to hurl insults at writers then the person who wrote the post or article doesn't bother reading the entire comment. I had several instances where people wrote comments that were so impressive I ran them as updates UNDER my original post -- and we have several people on TMV as cobloggers who actually wrote comments that were so thoughtful they were invited to coblog. If people could simply edit out their anger that someone sees something differently and comment on what the disagree with in a post and make their best counter argument a real debate could take place and some minds might actually be changed.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/Enxit Group, LLC