An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

When Good Things Have Bad Effects

It has often been said that you should be careful of what you wish for because often there will be very unexpected consequences. Looking at the current situation of international politics I have been thinking of this a lot lately.

To offer a more local example, I live near the community of Lodi, California. For many years Lodi was known by police across the country as being one of the safest places to live, virtually crime free. While the local police did a good job that was not the main reason for the lack of crime.

The safety of Lodi was due to the fact that it was where the leaders of the west coast branch of organized crime sent their families to live.  

As you might imagine once this became well known few criminals wanted to operate in the area. The chance that the little old lady you mugged might be the grandmother of a mob boss tended to convince you to avoid being within 20 miles of the community. At the same time the mob considered Lodi neutral ground and did nothing to harm anyone there.

Then the law did just what it was supposed to do, it brought down the mob and sent many of the leaders to prison. As a result the protection that Lodi had was no longer in place. Now I am obviously glad that they got rid of the mob but the fact is that it had unintended consequences.

Although on a different level, the same thing happened to crime in a lot of areas of the country. I am no fan of crime but at least the mob did keep it ‘organized’. Activities were restricted to certain parts of town and things like drug dealing were generally frowned upon.

Today the gangs run the crime world and it is pretty much anything goes. Obviously I’d love to have a world without crime, but since that is unlikely, I sometimes find myself nostalgic for the ‘good old days’.

The point of the story is that the same thing has been happening in the international community and in some ways we may be similarly nostalgic for something we never really liked.

Growing up as a child of the 1980’s I shared something with my parents and my grandparents, the fear of the Soviet Union. They were the bad guys and we worried about what they might do. It wasn’t just something from a James Bond movie, there was a real concern about them. Living in a primary target city I knew that if the worse thing came to pass then I was doomed.

But at the same time there was a certain level of security. While there were still terrorists out there they were frequently kept in check by the US and the USSR. In short we had ‘our bad guys’ and ‘their bad guys’ and neither side let them go too far.

Even the fear of war was more of a theory than anything else. Deep down we knew it could happen but wa also knew that both sides were reasonably rational. As Dr. Falken pointed out in the classic 80’s film War Games ‘It just doesn’t make sense’.

Today we no longer have to fear the Soviets but we do have to worry about dozens of other threats, often from people who are far less rational than the most unstable Soviet or American leader from the Cold War.

It kind of makes you wonder what will happen if we manage to win the war on terror.

  • onleyone
    and how will we know when we've "won"? there have been terrorists as long as there have been nation-states.
  • archangel
    very interesting PE. the peace from fear of might. very interesting

    dr.e
  • Neocon
    Im not sure how old any of you are but i grew up diving under my desks in elementary school as we practiced nuke bomb drills. I for one grew up wanting to WIN the cold war. That made me angry that People could blow me up from 12,000 miles away while I sat peacefully at school learning the three R's.

    I think to many different generations with many different backgrounds the war on terror and winning it mean something different to each one of them. A new generation who has grown up with the ability to reach out and touch someone 12,000 miles away is not that uncommon. Being international is who we are now and its clearly affected how we perceive threats. GWB is of my Generation and his perceptions are a bit different then the younger people who grew up in different times.

    My daughter the other day asked me. We were at war with Russia? She was like flabberghasted at the thought. She is 30 but when the Wall came down she was only 12 and not having to dive under desks like her parents did. Makes a big difference in how the world is viewed.
  • Don Quijote
    It kind of makes you wonder what will happen if we manage to win the war on terror.


    We are not suppose the win the war on terror, it's the never ending war, the Energizer Bunny of wars, it goes on and on and on or at least long enough to get some new replacement enemy (China, India, Brazil, Russia, EU take your pick). How else can you justify a half trillion dollar military, a unitary executive and the trashing of the constitution.

    Besides it easier to shear the sheep if they are afraid of the wolf.
  • DLS
    To correct leftist misstatements, what we have to do is to be a sheepdog to protect the sheep from the wolves.

    The areas with terrorism are developmental and cultural wastelands for which we are obviously not responsible, and as a practical matter it is not necessary to get them to Understand and love us (or to try to sweet talk them or give them money to buy their good will -- note to presidential candidates and voters) when they evilly and irrationally hate us. It is sufficient in lieu of their loving us that they fear us or face harsh consequences when they attack us. We have the right and even the duty to teach them harsh lessons when they attack or threaten to attack even if they may never learn.
  • DLS
    "I for one grew up wanting to WIN the cold war."

    Shame on you for being so politically incorrect. Warmonger! On the wrong side!
  • mikkel
    Patrick, I sympathize with your thoughts but I do feel it's important to point out that tens of millions of people died in proxy wars. To them the struggle was far from just a theory.

    I also take issue with the idea that our main enemies aren't rational. They are frightenly so. Bin Laden's stated goal has always been to have spectacular attacks that draw us into intractable wars and eventually lead to bankruptcy, knowing that we would then lose most of our influence in the world. His inner circle is comprised of many that are highly educated in a wide variety of things like engineering and finance (in fact many of his inner circle has PhDs).

    Their tactics might seem unfair and even evil, but they are all done with very directed reasons. Except for some insane renegades such as Zarqawi (who was opposed by leadership for a very long time due to his bloodlust and was only embraced because he had won popular admiration amongst the "troops") the terrorist groups act with great deliberation. It is a mistake to overlook this. Their value system might be completely different and seem irrational, but their methods definitely are.

    The difference is that they have no central location we can threaten to retaliate, and no people that they must rule. This is why they threaten us directly rather than through geopolitical chess.
  • runasim
    Winning the war on terror is as nebulous as winning the war on crime, so it's an apt analogy, particularly so as winning either war would require a complete revamping of human nature.

    Crime is as old as human history and binLaden didn't invent terrorism. As recently as WWII, tens of thousands of civilians in both Japan and Germany were the victims of terrorism via the bombing into rubble of thir cities. That's without even mentioning use of the A bomb. We say that's okay, and I agree, because in the end, more lives may have been saved by ending the war more quickly , but terrorism is terorism nevertheless. We are judging ends, not means.when we talk about the war on terror, and we should be clear about that.

    Consequences are always unpredictable, and not only in Lodi. By defeating one evil (Hitler), the Allies enabled another (Stalin).The victims of the SSR are understnadably not grateful At best, they are forgiving.

    As terrorism changes hands and means of delivery. crime morphs as well. Some global crime networks are now so rich and powerful as to rival that of many sovereign states.

    Another of our wars, the one on drugs, is having terrible consequences all over the globe. Even today the BBC reports on corruption in Colombia reaching into their Justice system up to the hgihest levels. Eradication of poppy crops in Afghanistan has been counterproductive from the start.

    Our problem is that we keep dreamng about paradise on earth, where the dark side of human nature will no longer exist,. More important is our falure to adapt and change tactics while crime, terrorism and the narcotics business do so with great innovation.



    .
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC