An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Through the Long Lens of Time

It’s not often that I dedicate any virtual ink in this space to the editorial work of Nicholas Kristof, but this week he attempted to address an uncomfortable yet important subject in his column, The Truth Commission. The subject matter, unfortunately, is one where we are unlikely to find any fertile ground for an open, honest discussion between opposing sides. The reason? The author leaps directly, with no hint of subtlety, to the phrase “war crimes” as employed by Antonio Taguba in his recent report on American torture. The phrase alone is radioactive and tends to shut down any and all discussion faster than you can say whodunit. Upon its utterance, the eyes of most of my conservative friends begin to glaze over. Comments are then made which include phrases such as “moonbats” or “Code Pink” and “support our troops“, whereupon we march merrily on to the next topic.

Our more liberal colleagues share the blame in equal portion for this breakdown in communications. Since the very first missles began to rain down on Baghdad they have co-opted the phrase, crying out that “Bush is a war criminal!” and “Bush lied, people died!” until the charges became a cacophony of self-parody. Still, Kristol garners an E for effort in trying to wrap his arms around the subject.

There is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes,” Antonio Taguba, the retired major general who investigated abuses in Iraq, declares in a powerful new report on American torture from Physicians for Human Rights. “The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account.”

Next, he bravely moves on to suggest a corrective course of action.

The first step of accountability isn’t prosecutions. Rather, we need a national Truth Commission to lead a process of soul searching and national cleansing.

That was what South Africa did after apartheid, with its Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and it is what the United States did with the Kerner Commission on race and the 1980s commission that examined the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

Today, we need a similar Truth Commission, with subpoena power, to investigate the abuses in the aftermath of 9/11.

This will be far too bitter a pill to swallow for many – at least for the present. There has been a temptation in our post-9/11 thinking to put aside traditional lofty goals and ideals for the sake of expediency as we confront fears – both real and imagined – of a global threat to our future. Facing the prospect of a shadowy, barely understood enemy from foreign lands, some of us have felt entitled to treat “the other” as somehow less human and less deserving of the same rights and dignities which Americans enjoy. We even fall back on the writings of our founding fathers to find comfort in the fact that such priveleges were never meant for “non-citizens” and particularly so during a crisis such as this. I have, to my regret, been guilty of these same charges on occasion.

Kristol’s proposed solution – this “truth commision” – is a tempting offer, but it comes at the wrong time. America has long excelled at self-examintion, finding the flaws, faults and errors in our own behavior and seeking redress of same. But it’s not something we have historically been able to achieve in the moment. As with our attempts at reparations for slavery, mistreatment of indigenous natives and the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War Two, we’re far more comfortable addressing our failures long after the principal actors are dead and buried. Like a bad vaudeville director, we are unable to break out the hook while the villians are still on the stage.

The time may – and should – come when we will take ourselves to task for some of the activities detailed in General Taguba’s report, but I find it unlikely in the extreme that many of us will live to see the day. For now, external threats are trumping higher purpose, and while many of us may feel a periodic twinge of guilt or regret, the threat of “the other” lurking near every parked minivan will provide cover for our consciences. We want to continue seeing America as that shining city upon the hill, and we don’t care to think that dark, scurrying sounds are coming up from the cellars after the lights have been shuttered. But they are.

e-mail the author: jazzshaw@gmail.com

  • Neocon
    “There is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes,”

    “The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account.”

    And this cry. This mantra. This single unity of purpose by the left is exactly why the right is going after Obama with such fervor.

    The Obama supporter whether they be left, center or right, cannont understand why anyone does not want to consider Obama for what he says as opposed to what he is.

    What is he? He is the representation of the far left who HATE BUSH. HATE the WAR. HATE the Telecoms. Hate all things moderate. Obama represents this. True or not is irrelevant.

    It will be his tag going forth and it will ensure that the day he steps in office that those who feel castrated by the left will want his head on a platter just as those who want Bush's head on a platter have not relented in their unmerciful attacks on Bush and company.

    So your right. I do not believe a rational discussion can be had because those that take part in it are so polarized as to be incapable of seeing the other sides point of view and even if they are able to manage that they will not act upon it in a coherent manner.
  • Neocon
    I am all for Impeaching Bush.

    IF we impeach every politician who voted for permission to go to war. Dodd, Biden, Clinton, HARRY FREAKIN REID.

    Impeach them all and Im all for it. AFter all we elected them to oversee our government and they failed us, let us down.

    How did we reward them? Harry Reid is in charge of the senate. Biden and Dodd are the top prospects for Obama's running mate and Hillary Clinton almost, ever so closely became the Democrats nominee for president.

    And the left continues to be puzzled at how the right can support their own......Lord have mercy
  • runasim
    I'm afraid you're right, Jazz, about Anerica's inability to face up to its dark side.
    That scares me. Sometimes, the right time never comes, or it comes too late.
    I think that is happening with the legacy of slavery and racism in America.

    Don't be negative. Look at the bright side. If you talk about it, you hate America.
    In silence, we condone and allow unacknowledged guilt turn into hate.

    Not a good prophesy for our future.
  • TheNewCentrist
    Yeah, I read the article and I know a bit about the Kerner Commission (TKC) as well. I bring it up every semester in my introductory seminar on American History. Both are way off point but I'll stick to TKC.

    TKC posited:

    "White racism is essentially responsible for the explosive mixture that has been accumulating in our cities since the end of World War II."

    The report also concluded that a massive redistribution of income had to take place to remedy this problem. It also suggested the addition of 1 million government-created jobs, the institution of a higher minimum wage, significantly increasing welfare benefits, spending more money on education and housing, and so on.

    For conservatives, both the diagnosis and the proposed remedies were highly dubious, but they established the liberal orthodoxy on racial issues for a generation. Conservatives argued that liberals created the situation that made the riots possible, the notion that the local, state, and federal government or some combination of the three would be able to solve the very real problems in low-income communities. For conservatives these problems were primarily located within the family and culture, rather than being due to capitalism. In essence, the conservatives placed the focus on liberal policy and by extension the rioters themselves. So what did conservatives propose to remedy the situation?

    Perhaps predictably for conservatives, the primary matter at hand was guaranteeing law and order. After all, for the conservatives, law and order was the foundation of society and government. Second, eliminate the minimum wage and reduce welfare to encourage people to work. Third, eliminate rent control. Forth, open up the unions to more African Americans. Fifth, support the development of minority businesses and the development of a Black middle class. Perhaps most importantly, conservatives insisted that liberals stop giving endless promises. Stop stimulating hopes that could not be instantly fulfilled.

    Conservative critiques of liberal policies were changing and developing at this time. No longer relegated to philosophical arguments they now had grounded empirical studies. Nevertheless it was easy to dismiss calls for patience, prudence and self-help as a moralistic indifference to suffering of the poor and people of color. Conservatives countered that, far from being cold or indifferent, it was they who promoting ideas and policies to actually do something about the situation. If more individuals had access to the market, it would allow greater numbers of individuals to create wealth rather. This emphasis on wealth creation, rather than redistribution is still part and parcel of conservative critiques today.

    As is well known today, the main impediment is not "institutional racism" but the collapse of the black family. TKC avoided this completely. It would not be addressed until the Moynihan Report. Kristoff is similarly off point in his op-ed. This is the same paper (NYT) that felt it was proper to disclose the identity of CIA employee who uncovered high-value information about Al Qaeda.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC