It'll be great, and I can't wait.
Thanks for making me see the light.

Do you really believe that a part whose intellectual center is in NYC, SF, and LA really care about blue collar whites in poor counties in the deep south?

As a mostly life-long Southerner, I'm under no illusion that Democratic candidates will sweep the South this year. But that doesn't mean the Party shouldn't invest and campaign heavily in the South. It wasn't that long ago that the South was as solidly Democratic as it is now Republican. The Party, and Obama in particular, are engaged in a so-called “50 state strategy,” building organization and Party ID for the long term. There are significant signs that it is having an effect. While a lot of the Republicans' recent losses are due to their own failures, as were the Democratic southern losses over the previous 3 decades, having organizations in place increases the party's ability to recruit good candidates, helps increase Democratic Party identification among voters and importantly, get out the vote efforts on election day.

It's a long-term strategy that has shown enough signs of early success that this Southerner hopes Democrats continue to work hard to earn votes here.

Of course the democrats can win the South with Clinton! That's a no brainer…

Ooops…wait a minute…oh, that's right…”we” picked the sure-loser….

I got a phone call from the democrat fundraisers yesterday. I told them to walk, that I was giving no money to my political party until they nominate the uniting candidate Clinton. Period. They listen when you talk $$. I say that each and every democrat utterly disgusted that our leaders hand-selected a losing, dividing candidate tell them to fund their own damn political party…

Because it no longer belongs to us anyway…why should we foot the bills?

Whats wrong with living in a socialist country run by Hispanics and Blacks where we have all our needs taken care of and we can reduce our military to the size of Canada's and ask someone else in the world to take care of us and protect us?

Why is that so bad. I'm kinda looking forward to your idea of the future. Free everything for everyone.

The Democratic candidates have a huge advantage is that they do not seem to effect each other the way Republican candidates do. If a Republican Controlled School Board wants to teach evolution, then all Republicans are tarred as anti-science idiots. Yet, if Democratic politicians in Chicago want to sue gun makers, pay racial reparations, or sue corporations because they profited from slavery 150 years ago, it does not affect moderate Democrats.

As the Democratic party become more dominate, it is going to easy for it to look more moderate while actually implementing more liberal policies. Someone like Jim Webb will be able to vote against gun control, reparations, racial quotas while knowing that there are at least 50 Democrats in the Senate capable of safely voting for the liberal policy.