An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

What’s Wrong with Alabama?

alabama.jpgI was watching one of the Sunday morning news shows and caught a portion of an interview with Alabama Attorney General Troy King. He was talking about a potential voter fraud investigation in the western portion of his state, which seems to tie into this report from Alabama.com from this week. There were numerous allegations, including reports of absentee voter ballots being sold for $40 each.

ALABAMA ATTORNEY General Troy King and U.S. Justice Department officials shouldn’t be fighting over who gets to investigate possible election fraud in Perry County.

There’s enough evidence of voting irregularities in that west Alabama county to keep state and federal investigators busy getting to the bottom of it.

Mr. King also thinks something may be rotten in the voting in Bullock, Jackson and Lowndes counties. He should go all-out in determining whether, as one anti-fraud activist put it, a “crime against democracy” occurred in those jurisdictions.

Mr King spoke of one of his investigators being arrested for “harassment” in Perry County when they went to collect handwriting samples and conduct interviews. What is so unusual in Perry County to warrant all of this attention? Apparently it’s the incredibly (some might say unbelievably) patriotic and civic minded attitude of the county’s residents.

Perry County tends to have remarkably high turnouts and an equally remarkable number of absentee voters. Consider the June 3 primary, which attracted about 16 percent of the state’s registered voters to the polls. In Perry County, more than 50 percent of the eligible voters cast ballots in the primary election.

A turnout that high is enough to raise eyebrows, but the most surprising thing about the primary vote totals was the number of Perry County residents who voted absentee. In a county with a population of about 11,000, 1,114 absentee votes were recorded. That’s about a fourth of the total turnout.

I went to Election Atlas to take a peek at the 2006 gubernatorial election results in the Yellowhammer State. You’ll want to follow the link and poke around, because some of these results are sure to raise eyebrows. Little old Perry County had an estimated population of roughly 11,000 and turned out 4,270 voters in an off year. Impressive! And nearly a quarter of them were absentee ballots. (Must be hard to get time off from the farm to head down to the polling places.) For a comparison, take a look at their neighbors in Bibb County. Demographically, along lines of race, income, religion, etc. the two seem nearly identical. Bibb is a bit larger, though, with an estimated population of nearly 22,500 and they only managed to turn out 5,550 voters. (Under four percent were absentee ballots. They probably have better cars there I’m guessing.)

Of course, it wasn’t just the number of voters which was notable, but also how they voted. In Bibb County it looked like a hard fought, somewhat close race for such a conservative area. Republican Bob Riley managed a win by a margin of 58% to 39%. It was a respectable victory, but hardly outside of the margins of what you would expect. But in tiny Perry County, the massive number of civic minded citizens delivered a 70% to 29% victory for Democrat Lucy Baxley. 70%? Really? And for the Democrat? I’m not sure if we could get 70% of America to agree that strangling kittens was “bad.”

Of course, none of this provides rock solid proof of wrongdoing without more evidence. I suppose it’s theoretically possible that Perry County is just a hugely politically active bastion of Democratic support. But let’s wish the A.G. the best of luck in his work. It certainly sounds like he’s got plenty of it in front of him.

Additional material from the Demopolis Times.

e-mail the author: jazzshaw@gmail.com

  • timr
    its always stories about the dems doing voter fraud isn't it? The repigs are just so totally honest that "they" would never consider doing anything like that. Rumors and innuendo, no proof, but always the snide way the "facts" are presented. And its always a repig who is so zealous in persecuting those rotten dems who despoil our pristine system. What was it ,7 DoJ AG's got fired because they would not bring cases of voter fraud against those dirty dems. and 93-7=86 who were not fired. Hmmmmmmm. Innuendo and rumors can work both ways, right? So did those other 86 DoJ lawyers make any cases against dems and voter fraud? Well they tried to in NJ, lots of leaks but no actual case, other cases have been dismissed because they were flat out stoopid-grads of liberty U law school maybe?-So what lies ahead between now and Nov, how many more federal cases of the dirty dems abusing the system thru VOTER FRAUD! (GASP)!!!
  • FYI.... registered Independent (who is not backing McCain)

    There are plenty of stories of voter fraud involving Repulicans also, each and every year. This just happens to be the latest one to hit the presses and it just happened to be about Democrats in one Alabama County. But that doesn't mean that it's not news just because it happens to (possibly) involve Democrats.
  • superdestroyer
    Considering that Perry county is about 70% black, it is amazing that the Democratic candiate only received 70% of the vote.

    Timr,

    It is actually harder to Republicans to commit fraud because there are few counties in the U.S that are as overwhelming Republican as the bluest counties are overwhelming Democratic.

    In places like St Louis where the Repubicans do not even bother to campaign and the Republicans do not field candidates for most offices, it is much easier for Democrats to cheat that in a county that is 55% Republican and 45% Democratic.
  • timr
    but what proof do the repigs have, real proof, not stats-which can be made to prove anything.? Other than the fact that a county that is 70% black, one that no repig actually bothered to campaign in, and SURPRISE, a whole bunch voted dem. Ahhhh, did anyone think that maybe just maybe that those voters are kind of feeling their oats because Obama is the dem candidate for prez? So a whole bunch of them came out to vote. Or maybe there was a local issue or person that the voters really cared about. I am really sick and tired of people seeing "conspiracies" everywhere. 99.9% of the time there is no conspiracy. Chaos rules!
  • timr
    Jazz, really, can you link to one?
    SuperD, and if the dems out number the repigs by that much, why would they bother to cheat? Hasn't it been the case in the past-LBJ-won by 52 votes comes to mind-that it is easier and much more necessary to cheat when the election is down to just a few votes? Now I can cite several districts here in Texas where that happened in the primaries(all that I have heard about-local news only-were between repigs, no dems involved, and since there were no dems involved, the Tx AG-repig nor the DoJAG-also repig, and suspect because he was not fired like the 7 others, sat on their hands and did............nothing. Big whoop there.
  • superdestroyer
    timr,

    LBJ stole votes in Duvall county that was overwhelmingly Democratic. Stealing votes in one county that affects a state election is the easiest thing to do.

    When there are few if any competative local elections, the turnout should be lower. When the turnout is well above the state average, red flags should be raised.

    There were the precients in Philly where more than 100% of the registered voters voted. since they were in black neighborhoods where the Republicans are incapable of sending observers, it is easier to steal votes.
  • timr, I really don't know what to tell you at this point. The state AG sends an investigator to gather handwriting samples and testimony, and he GETS ARRESTED? The locals certainly have a lot to answer for. The numbers are staggering, even if you got every African American out to vote every time. Is it really that impossible for you to consider that some small, local group of Democrats are humans also, and might be prone to corruption and wrongdoing if it would benefit them? Do you seriously think that it's *only* the Republicans every single time and every Democratic activist is a saint?

    If so, I can't help you. All I'm saying is that it's worth the AG's time to investigate and certainly looks suspect.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC