An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Barack Obama: From Messiah to Pariah?

01aaa_obama_halo.jpg

There is something comical but ultimately rather sad about the widespread dropping of jaws over Barack Obama’s support of the expansion of government surveillance powers and other recent actions that reveal him to be someone whom he has been all along — a hard assed and thoroughly pragmatic politician who does not walk on water but has been astute at harnessing this image to power his own ambitious path to the Democratic presidential nomination and White House.

Part of the disappointment has to do with Obama supporters having much more to lose as the scales fall from their eyes.

When John McCain does one of his routine flip flops, it is par for the course. But the howls of outrage in the blogosphere and sense of betrayal on the part of some Obamaniacs as he suddenly seems to be running against form still is surprising considering how cynical many of these bloggers have been about the presidential campaign in general.

Not that there are no flies on me.

I have bought into Obama’s hope-and-change message while expressing concern early and often as to whether he has enough experience and can surround himself with enough people who do have the experience to lead us away from the Age of Bush to the promised land of electoral and government reform. So I am disappointed that he endorsed the FISA bill after having said earlier that he would filibuster the measure, which is an atrocious piece of legislation because it legalizes illegal behavior.

I am disappointed that Obama put himself in the position of having to apologize to two Muslim women after they were barred from a campaign photo op, as well as his tap dancing in general on all things Muslim. I am disappointed that he has pandered to the ethanol crowd, which is making a further hash of energy and agriculture policy. And I am disappointed . . . well, you get the point.

Indeed, there have been several times recently when Obama has seemed more an insider than fresh upstart. I am disappointed yes, but not surprised.

Eight presidential campaigns and a snoutful of realism forces me to acknowledge that you can’t be a politician without being a member of the political class, and that even the most principled politician carries in their hip pocket an adjustable wrench known as pragmatism.

It is in this context that Obama is doing exactly what anyone in his position should do: Run to his base in the primaries and run to the center in the general election. And hope that what he says over the next five months helps bring to bear what could be a signal accomplishment of the opening months of his presidency — consensus building in an era of divide-and-conquer politics.

  • superdestroyer
    While progressives love to tout themselves as the reality based community, they keep putting their hopes into politicians who are fakes on their surface. Does anyone really believe that a politician that has develop his career by playing the race card really believe in consensus. Does anyone really believe that a politicians who would throw his grandmother under the bus his a fake story about menacing black men in Hawaii to defend a race hustler really believe in consensus. If Senator Obama really believe in consensus, he would have put some effort into appeal to blue collar whites instead of settling on winning the Democratic Primary with a 50% plus 1 strategy.
  • Holly_in_Cincinnati
    Thanks Shaun!
  • Pete Abel
    Shaun -- Thanks for this. We are exactly on the same page and I don't think anyone could have reflected this POV better than you have here.
  • mikkel
    "Run to his base in the primaries and run to the center in the general election."

    But that's the thing: FISA shouldn't be (and probably isn't) the center. Staunch conservatives should reject it because it is against their ideals as well.

    Ethanol is not the center. Again, all reasonable people agree it makes no sense.

    I'm not disappointed that Obama is primarily a centrist -- I like that and always believed he was -- I am disappointed that his "consensus" building on these issues is in the beltway power structures that have no real base of support in the general population...or at least shouldn't.

    The only silver lining is that he doesn't seem to support it much himself and just saw that it was a losing cause to fight it. Still he should have spoken out.
  • runasim
    The more everyone is disappointed, angry or autraged, the more I like Obama.
    I never expected him to walk on water. I was just betting on him to walk in the right direction, and in that I am not in the least disappointed..

    In a country as divided as ours, pragmatism is the only possible way to work. Revolution would only be followed by counter revolution, and we'd be back to square one.

    As to his working on the Beltway instead of depending on popular support, I'm glad he's not so naive as to depend on the undependable.. Popular support is a fleeting thing, while moving governance in the right direction is a long term, inch-by-inch undertaking. Juggling the centrist opinion on an issue while gauging the odds for getting it implemented demands prioritization. Prioritization and pragmatism are a good duo.
    In fact, slow and steady has a better chance of survival than fast and rash.

    I don't like all his decisions. I expect to dislike more of them.
    As long as the direction is the right direction, Obama willl have my support.

    .
    .
  • Here's the funny thing, all of the black folks in my family who support Senator Obama for the POTUS have ALWAYS said "he's a politician". It's the racial pride that's fueling their vote. In fact, Obama's change message means, to me, away from Bush and the Republicans. I've never, and you can read my blog posts here, thought that Senator Obama can bring about the "America Utopia". Only a dictator can do that and that would probably not be a utopia...
  • runasim
    Mikkel,

    I agree with you about ethanol, (which,btw, is less complicated than FISA.
    What I don't see is an easy way to tackle the problem.
    Ethanol producers , and the local ecomy around them,are constituents, and as wrong headed as they and their Congresspeople may be, they can't be ignored, especially in this economic climate.

    Like the poppy growers of Afghanistan, they need an alternate source of profits.if they are to stop growing corn to produce ethanol.
    The ideas are coming so fast and furious, I don't know what Obama has in mind in this regard. I hope, though, that he is considering this aspect, or there will be chaos instead of improvement. Encourage use of switch grass instead?

    Whatever the final decision, the local economy has to be sustained while new businesses or different business come up.
    At least, that 's the way it looks to me.
  • RememberNovember
    Does anyone really care what SuperD has to say? Seems like he got a BA in Ad Hominem writing.
  • I'm somewhat disappointed in Obama over the FISA legislation. On the other hand, it makes political sense for Obama to express qualified support on this highly emotionally charged issue, while possibly working behind-the-scenes with others, like Chris Dodd, who can fight this battle without handing McCain another talking point.

    There's a political reality about ethanol too. An enormous amount of political and financial power is concentrated in the hands of petroleum interests, and the Republican Party is the seat of that power, which to this day fights to equate patriotism with continued and increased pandering to big oil. Who can unseat this powerful and wealthy coalition? How about the corn lobby? Getting big oil out of the driver's seat is an important goal, and the coalition of agribusiness companies and farmers is an important Democratic constituency. It will be up to the new administration to move our production of alternative fuels in a more environmentally sound direction. The agribusiness companies and the farmers are capable of producing crops that take less petroleum input to grow, and it will be to their financial advantage to do so. The big shift right now is from drilling and mining for energy sources, to growing them. Decisions about what exactly we grow as feedstock for our alternative fuels will be made over the course of time, and I believe wise decisions can and will be made.
  • Cupples
    Shaun,

    We know that McCain has already supported public-unfriendly policies for political gain. Evidence of similar tendencies on Obama's part were in plain sight months ago, but it wasn't until after he clinched the nomination that we started seeing blatant evidence (FISA, NAFTA, campaign funding...).

    That said, I understand why many bloggers (esp. those who aren't as seasoned as you) feel outraged and disillusioned.

    Seven years under GWB made many bloggers ravenous for a president who would be vastly different from ordinary politicians.

    Obama came along and repeatedly said that he is non-ordinary (and new and clean and not taking lobbyist dollars and...) .

    He said those things effectively enough that many people were so thrilled with the claims that they didn't check them out before becoming emotionally invested.

    But it wasn't just the bloggers' hopes and emotions that fueled their mis-assessments. Sen. Obama's campaign diligently worked to feed their hopes and emotions -- and, perhaps more importantly, many media outlets didn't check the claims either.

    Personally, I give those bloggers a pass for overlooking evidence that would have cast doubt on some of the ad slogans and sound bites.

    I just hope that in future races, they'll do more research before emotionally investing in a candidate (and encouraging their readers to emotionally invest).

    Lastly, I think the notion that Obama is merely running "to the center" is comfortingly euphemistic but inaccurate in this case.

    The FISA bill is not a compromise and it is not a policy on which one should have even attempted to compromise. You know that: evident in your pointing out that FISA essentially legalizes illegal behavior.

    In the Obama-McCain comparison FISA doesn't mean much, though, because McCain outright supports both parts of the new FISA bill and makes no bones about it.
  • aba23
    I agree with the post and many of the comments. Actually listening to what the man says would cure a lot of the implausible expectations of certain Obama supporters. He has earned my support for his more fundamental attitudes toward party growth (broadbased, big tent, grassroots) and governing (pluralistic, pragmatic, transcending ossified ideologies) rather than a checklist of positions. I know I'll agree with some and not with others.

    The other point to remember is that he has a LOT more information than we do on the pragmatic benefits of the positions he's staking out and the path he visualizes to achieve his important goals. This does take trust, and that is the measure of the man that we all must make for ourselves.
  • CitizenKang
    Perhaps my cynicism is showing, but I expect it's a good thing that Obama is not only a left/center Democrat, but that he is a pragmatic left/center Democrat.

    I'm not overfond of ideologues on the left or right who, it seems to me, spend too much time trying to fit reality to fit their preconceived ideas than adjusting their ideas to reality.

    Obama seems to have no such problem, and to my thinking that's a very good thing.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC