<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Demise of Economic Globalization?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/comment-page-1/#comment-136653</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/science/energy/gas-prices/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/#comment-136653</guid>
		<description>Rail transport is more efficient than trucking so I&#039;d expect to see improved rail with Mexico, though I don&#039;t know if it&#039;ll go much further south. The rail companies are already doing a lot to improve the U.S. system and expect it to take over more of the freight transport from long range trucking with distribution going from rail centers via smaller, more fuel efficient trucks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The main thing that I think will hit globalization in the long run is that societies just can&#039;t stay stable in the long run with the kind of disparities that you see in China now. So when they close the income gap and you combine that with increasing transportation expenses the article has a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rail transport is more efficient than trucking so I&#39;d expect to see improved rail with Mexico, though I don&#39;t know if it&#39;ll go much further south. The rail companies are already doing a lot to improve the U.S. system and expect it to take over more of the freight transport from long range trucking with distribution going from rail centers via smaller, more fuel efficient trucks.</p>
<p>The main thing that I think will hit globalization in the long run is that societies just can&#39;t stay stable in the long run with the kind of disparities that you see in China now. So when they close the income gap and you combine that with increasing transportation expenses the article has a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/comment-page-1/#comment-136652</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/science/energy/gas-prices/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/#comment-136652</guid>
		<description>Shipping (water transport) remains very, very cheap as well as efficient.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And why don&#039;t we already have a double-tracked Pan-American Railroad?  It&#039;s not because of the howling by environmentalists and other activists.  It is much more responsibly out of concern by the ag industry of introduction of serious animal and plant diseases from South America. But more importantly, there aren&#039;t products there already that justify the railroad (not even raw materials, much less industrial and other higher-level products).  We&#039;d have been importing them from South (and Central) America already if it were possible.  What were our imports back then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shipping (water transport) remains very, very cheap as well as efficient.</p>
<p>And why don&#39;t we already have a double-tracked Pan-American Railroad?  It&#39;s not because of the howling by environmentalists and other activists.  It is much more responsibly out of concern by the ag industry of introduction of serious animal and plant diseases from South America. But more importantly, there aren&#39;t products there already that justify the railroad (not even raw materials, much less industrial and other higher-level products).  We&#39;d have been importing them from South (and Central) America already if it were possible.  What were our imports back then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Merritt</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/comment-page-1/#comment-136651</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/science/energy/gas-prices/20524/the-demise-of-economic-globalization/#comment-136651</guid>
		<description>When I start seeing either &quot;Made in _South American Country_&quot; or &quot;Made in USA&quot; on everything, then I&#039;ll start believing it.  Until then, not happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I start seeing either &#8220;Made in _South American Country_&#8221; or &#8220;Made in USA&#8221; on everything, then I&#39;ll start believing it.  Until then, not happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

