An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

John Edwards Mind Change: Yes, He Would “Seriously Consider” Vice Presidential Nod From Obama

apg_john_edwards_070424_ms.jpg

Former Senator John Edwards has signaled a change of mind: after initially throwing cold water on the idea, he now says he wouldn’t rule out saying yes to an offer of the Veepship on Democratic presumptive Presidential nominee Barack Obama’s ticket, if it were offered to him:

Former Democratic vice-presidential nominee John Edwards said on Sunday he would have to “seriously” consider another shot at the job if asked by White House hopeful Barack Obama.

But the former senator, who unsuccessfully ran for the party’s presidential nomination this year, reaffirmed that he was not actively seeking to be Obama’s running mate.

….”I’d take anything he asks me to think about seriously, but obviously this is something that I’ve done and it’s not a job I’m seeking,” Edwards told ABC News.

Edwards, who was Democrat John Kerry’s running mate in the 2004 election won by George W Bush, told Spanish newspaper Vanguardia earlier this month that “the vice-presidency is not a position that I desire”.

His comments to ABC appeared to leave open some wiggle room as Obama steps up his vetting of potential VP nominees.

Edwards has previously said he wasn’t only not interested in the Vice Presidential slot and that he wasn’t thinking about serving as Attorney General under Obama.

This seeming shift is likely due to two factors. For one thing, most Democrats (except for some former supporters of Hillary Clinton’s who are actively working to elect Republican John McCain as President) feel this is indeed a Democratic year and want to ensure the ticket wins — up and down the line. And, secondly, Edwards’ comment suggests he has concluded that Obama will indeed win.

Would Edwards help if he was invited on the ticket?

Edwards came out of his campaign this year respected for his campaign style and energy and his role as an advocate. On the other hand, he disappointed some in 2004 when he didn’t seem to live up to his advance hype as a campaigner. Even if he’s not on the ticket, his public revision of his I’m-not-interested stance reflects perceptions that the Obama ticket will come out of the convention enjoying a large degree of party unity (minus the group of Clinton supporters who want to defeat Obama who seem motivated more by anger than political policies) at a time when the Democrats could well win the White House.

  • runasim
    Reactions among Democrats are so fractious,, that''s it's hard to predict what an Obama-Edwards ticket would prouduce,
    Aside from the angry Hillary women, who seem to have no policy goals beyond wanting Hillary, the person, elected, basic ideals and goals are shared by most Democrats. There is a divergence of opinion about how to get there from here, however.

    One strand believes that a moderate approach, and a step-by-step strategy will be more effective in the long run, because it will avoid stagnation in constant battles with the GOP.
    The other strand believes that Democrats need to take hard, even extremee, positions in order to force the GOP into acceptable compromises.
    The GOP. in the meantime, is giving only lip-service to compromise of any kind.

    In the primaries, Edwards took a hard, populist postition, which appealed to the second group, but make the first group leery.
    Obama is much more centrist than the outcry from the right field labeling machine would have us believe
    We'd have to see how Edwards states his position in the context of the general election before beginning to gauge possible reactions.
    Will Edwards adapt his positions to the Obama ticket, or will he provide a counterbalance in it?
  • GeorgeSorwell
    I've never understood the appeal of John Edwards. I'm not even sure he has that much appeal. He couldn't carry his home state in 2004--if he had, John Kerry would be President. Not only that, he couldn't have gotten re-elected Senator.

    Dick Gephardt would have probably been more attractive to the voters of Ohio than Edwards.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC