An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

McCain: Four More Years of Mumbling? (Guest Voice)

_484FBF81_3624_4D54_B08A_30D4D8D65EF2_.gif

This Guest Voice column is by Michael Reagan, the son of former President Ronald Reagan who is is a popular radio talk show host. Guest Voice posts do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Moderate Voice or its writers.

McCain: Four More Years of Mumbling?
by Michael Reagan

The last thing America needs is another four years of listening to a president mumble. I don’t care how great the man is otherwise, and a quick look at the amazing progress in present day Iraq accomplished by the president reveals a greatness that offends liberals, but if he’s a mumbler that’s what he’ll be seen as.

The same is true of John McCain. His wartime heroism and whatever he’s accomplished in the United States Senate fades almost into obscurity because he is seen — and joked about — as a politician who, despite his boast of being a straight talker, is seen as a man who mumbles his way through the verbal thickets.

You can’t make a point if you can’t articulate it in the strongest and clearest way possible.

People remember a president who communicates. You may hate his message but you have no trouble absorbing it when Barack Obama speaks. He’s like the Pied Piper — he’ll lead you off a cliff, but while he’s doing it there’s no doubt that he can put two words together, finish a sentence, and sound as if he means what he says and has enough fiery rhetoric in his verbal arsenal to keep you marching behind him on the way to the cliff’s edge. He’s like a Venus’s-flytrap — you think you’re smelling roses when no matter how sweet the odor, it is really poison gas.

He’s a communicator, not a mumbler.

You don’t get that from John McCain. The faithful old Republican guard may understand him and vote for him, but if you’re looking for new recruits to cross over, your candidate has to at least sound as if he knows what he’s talking about on matters other than the Iraq war.

He has to lead, and he can’t just sit back and decide he is going to play this really nice guy with nary a mean word to mumble about his opponent, while his opponent has no intention of playing nice.

The Republican Party is looking for a real leader, not a Dr. Phil who can see the bright side of a tornado.

The last leader Republicans had was Newt Gingrich. You may not have liked him but you always knew damn well where he stood. He never equivocated, and you could hear and understand everything he said. And he led his party to an astonishing victory in 1994.

Barack Obama, with all of his manifest faults and empty promises and outright misstatements of the facts, is at least leading the troops. And that’s exactly what John McCain is not doing, and what he has to do if he wants to win in November.

He is deluding himself by thinking he can sit on his campaign bus and make nice with his pals in the media who no longer worship at his feet, having found a new idol in Barack Obama.

He needs to show leadership instead of musing about how he was once a prisoner of war who heroically resisted his brutal captors, because many of the people who’ll vote in November were not even alive during the war in Vietnam. To them it’s ancient history, They want to hear solutions to the gas-price crisis, for example, not recollections of a past they didn’t share.

He can’t gain any points recalling the failed presidency of Jimmy Carter because there are lots of people out there who at best only vaguely know that Carter was once president or who have any idea of what he did when in the White House.

When he talks about the Vietnam war, or Jimmy Carter, McCain has to explain what he’s talking about, and the American people have little interest or patience in matters that have to be explained.

If something has to be explained, it’s something you shouldn’t talk about.

McCain doesn’t seem to realize that what the public perceives is reality. In politics, perception and reality are the same. True of not, the perception is that George Bush hasn’t led. The reality is that we have no leadership and we’re hungry for a leader.

At this point in time, Barack Obama may be leading us off a cliff, but at least he’s whistling the tune the voters want to hear.

John McCain needs to find his tune, and then sing it loud and clear. He can’t mumble his away into the White House.

Mike Reagan, the elder son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is heard on more than 200 talk radio stations nationally as part of the Radio America Network. ©2008 Mike Reagan. Mike’s column is distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc.

Cartoon by Mike Lane, Cagle Cartoons

  • Silhouette
    Yes but...

    McCain is a decorated war veteran in a time of war, up against a babe in the woods. We all know voters will look past his trivial foibles and to his experience when Big Media announces in October that we have new and dire troubles in Iran.

    The psychology of herd behavior and spooking will not be lost on GOP/Big Media strategy,

    In fact it's even been postulated that some of their numbers post at sites like this one painting down McCain (seems counterproductive eh?) a bit , in unimportant ways, and even moderately important ways, like the way he mumbles and whatnot (in stark contrast to Obama the Wizard of Smoothspeak). This by contrast paints Obama as seemingly-electable, when everyone knows he's not..

    It also helps divert attention away from the fact that there is still time to nominate Hillary if we bring enough pressure to bear on our superdelegates. We can tell them that even though we supported Obama, we now suspect he is a paper candidate, witting or unwitting, for the GOP, to set to flame as soon as we have fully stepped into the trap in August.

    Yes, McCain seeming unelectable will be the GOP party fare until September 1st. Then watch for a R-A-D-I-C-A-L change in how McCain is portrayed. You won't hear a mumble about his mumble..

    Get involved. Stop the GOP trickery before it's too late.

    Obama Expatriates: silhouette@suddenlink.net
  • DLS
    "He’s like the Pied Piper"

    And he has the kiddies and the liberal media swarming after him this year.
  • Silhouette
    Yes. And doesn't the GOP know it. They have a bear trap set for the Pied Piper though...round about September 1st, give or take.

    Unless we wise up and nominate the popular-vote nominee.

    Write your superdelegates and get involved

    Obama Expatriates: silhouette@suddenlink.net
  • runasim
    There are two separate and contradictory themes here.

    One is encoded in the repeated mesage about Obama and going over a cliff. That's a more nefarious,claim, since it's totally unsubstantiated, than the nefarious nature of Obama's rhetoric is claimed to be, since that is wholly contradicted by Obama's many specific policy statements. However, we can discern the first theme here: don't vote for Obama.

    The other theme is embedded in charges concerning McCain's mumbling. I don't think mumbling is McCains's problem, his multiple gaffes are. For a long time, I thougjt that criticism of his gaffes were unfair; anyone can misspeak at times. Lately, I'm beginning to wonder. He recently referred to habeas corpus and possible detainee nuisance suits for better food, etc, in such a way as to make them seem related. I'm willing to give McCain the benefit of doubt and assume that this was either another gaffe or a badly constructed sentence, but in the aggragate, i'm beginning to wonder if underneath the gaffes, he really knows what he is talking about.
    Other than that, I think McCain is smart to not attempt to match Obama's oratory, since he would always lose the match. Instead, he has chosen a folksy, chatty style, which contrasts Obama enough to actually draw attention to himself. If you can;t win, play a different game.

    But the mumbling crtiticism seems to imply a second theme: Mccain is not an adequate leader, therefore, don't vote for him.
    Where does that leave ua? No to Obama AND no to McCain?
    This post seems to have bitten its own tail.

    .
  • DLS
    "Yes. And doesn't the GOP know it. "

    What can the GOP do? Any criticism of Obama that could be honestly or dishonestly construed to be racist will be shrieked by the media, liberal and Dem-beholden, as "racist." McCain is dull and will look and sound poor compared to Obama in debates (fresh face versus non-innovative oft-Dem-Lite geezer). Now if Obama continues the Big Lie about McCain being a continuation and copy of Bush, and says it'll be a "third Bush term" if McCain is elected, the truth can be flung right back at Obama that Obama threatens to be Carter's second term or McGovern's first. (That's good for several vote-switches for McCain, even if voters hold their noses.) If Obama plays it safe (his most politically active fans don't demand any substance from the man whatsoever -- he Makes Them Feel Good), and successfully exploits our current economic problems and otherwise looks better for people and their lives in this country than McCain attempts to offer or to promise, I believe it's almost impossible for Obama to fail to be our next President.

    (I'm more curious than truly concerned at this time what his administration would do once in power; I'm more concerned than merely curious what all the Dems in DC will do once they are in charge of both Congressional houses plus the White House. The party and Washington machinery-establishment will dominate, not Obama.)




    * * *

    On a more Levitacious note, I'm surprised nobody has remarked about this yet:

    "a quick look at the amazing progress in present day Iraq accomplished by the president reveals a greatness that offends liberals"
  • DLS
    "They have a bear trap set for the Pied Piper though"

    Nothing like a good "IED" set on the path, heh, heh, only figuratively speaking, of course. But I suspect the GOP has nothing. McCain so far is pretty much the next Dole. And he cannot rely on Obamian [tm] self-destruction to hand him the White House.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Michael Reagan says, "...a quick look at the amazing progress in present day Iraq accomplished by the president reveals a greatness that offends liberals."

    You are right, Michael, I am greatly offended, but--please--not by his "greatness."

    "Greatness" is not taking our nation into a disastrous war based on lies, cooked intelligence, exaggerations and deception.

    "Greatness" is not mismanaging such war at the expense of over 4,000 of our finest and bravest

    "Greatness" is not Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, torture, waterboarding, black prisons and extraordinary rendition, indefinite detention, the end of habeas corpus, kangaroo courts, warrantless NSA wiretapping on Americans...

    "Greatness" is not Walter Reed, the Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch lies, neglecting our veterans.

    "Greatness" is not Katrina, Valerie Plame, the firing of U.S. Attorneys, the Terry Schivo "case."

    "Greatness" is not, "Osama Bin Laden, where are you?", "Heckuva job, Brownie," "We don't torture,"

    "Greatness" is not Dick Cheney, Ronald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, Alberto Gonzales, Paul Bremer, Paul Wolfowitz, Scooter Libby, Doug Feith, John Bolton, Jack Abramoff, Duke Cunningham, Tom Delay, Mark Foley, Larry Craig, David Vitter, Halliburton, Blackwater...

    "Greatness" is not a vast increase in our budget deficit; an increase of over 60 percent in our national debt; attempts to privatize social security; pillorying Medicare, Medicaid, and children's health care; declaring war on stem cell research, global warming, evolution, research funding, abstinence programs; swift boating your political opponents.

    "Greatness" is not the failure to implement the 9/11 Commission recommendations; the failure to bring a modicum of peace and stability to the Middle East.

    "Greatness" is not using signing statements (more than 150 of them) to obey and implement only those parts of the law one likes.

    "Greatness" is not corruption, nepotism,cronyism, Dick Cheney's secretive Energy Task Force, lost White House emails, ignoring subpoenas, stonewalling, subverting justice.

    "Greatness" is not Recession, an economy in tatters, mounting fiscal deficits, tax relief only for the wealthy...

    "Greatness" is not promising to "restore honor and integrity to the White House," and doing just the opposite.

    "Greatness" is not, to begin with, getting selected by the Supreme Court with a little bit of help from Kathleen Harris and "dimpled chads."

    Sorry, Michael, but this kind of greatness offends not only "liberals," but every American.
  • "the amazing progress in present day Iraq accomplished by the president"

    I'm surprised too, DLS. So here. Have a little history lesson, Michael.

    Before we invaded Iraq, the nation was at peace. It had an educational system that was the envy of the Middle East. Women could drive and work, and did not wear the burqua. Children of both genders went to school. People sat in lively cafes, conversing and sipping espresso without fear of being killed where they sat. The electricity, the gas, the water and the sewers all worked. The oil was flowing. A secular strongman kept militants and jihadists OUT, and vigorously opposed Iran AND Al Qaeda. Not a kind ruler, but he kept warfare from flaring up between Sunni and Shia and Kurds. There was no Mahdi army, no Iranian influence.

    How cynical and selfish it is to describe the destruction of that country as "amazing progress." What the author means is that fewer Americans are dying there this year than last, but over 4,100 have died already (almost 50% more than on 9/11), tens of thousands maimed, over 1,000 a year attempt suicide, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died and for what? Today we have an Iran-friendly failed state that is a haven for terrorists and their citizens still over 100 times more likely to die a violent death than under Saddam Hussein.

    Way to go Bush.
  • pacatrue
    I probably don't read enough political blogs, but I've never heard mumbling as any sort of primary reservation about McCain from his supporters or critics until this post. I've seen people bashing him over immigration reform and others bashing him over supporting the Iraq war. I've seen bashing for ties to lobbyists and for being rich and for being old. But I don't think I've seen all that much about mumbling.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC