An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Democrats Playing Games With Unemployment Benefits

Earlier this week the US House held a vote on extending unemployment benefits by 13 weeks.

The vote on the proposal was 279 in favor and 141 opposed, which would seem to be a win. But instead the headlines read ‘House Fails To Extend Jobless Benefits’ or more ominously  ‘Republicans Block Longer Benefits’.

Now how would this be possible ? Isn’t a majority vote a win ?

Well not when you have the House leadership playing games with the vote. They brought the vote up under special House rules which required not a majority vote but instead a 2/3rds vote in  favor. Why would they do this  you might ask. The answer is simple, they wanted to play politics.

There is an old saying in Washington that explains this… Do you want the bill or do you want the issue ?

In this case the Democrats wanted to get the issue for the November elections. They knew that on a straight up and down majority vote that many Republicans would vote in favor of the bill (in fact almost 50 did). Many of these would be members in marginal districts while many who voted no would be in safe Republican districts. This would prevent a campaign against these members.

But by voting this way, now the Democrats can run ads in  November saying ‘Republicans voted against extending benefits and your Congressman is one of them. The fact that this particular member may have voted yes on the proposal is lost in the shuffle.

Today they will be voting on a straight majority up and down vote, so the bill will pass.

Just in the interests of fairness, I am well aware that the GOP pulled the same tricks when  they were in charge, I highlight the Democratic effort because it happened now.

  • Slamfu
    Its these kind of stunts that have me worried the Dems are going to waste their golden opportunity to fix things by being in Payback mode. Pelosi and especially Reid strike me as this type and I'm hoping Obama can rein it in if he wins.
  • pdx632
    Any way I can vote "None of the Above" in November?
  • Slamfu
    Voting is too powerful to throw it away. When in doubt, bitchslap the incumbents.
  • lurxst
    I guess the part about Bush threatening to veto the bill doesn't play at all into the attempt to get a veto-proof majority in the house? In the best instances these kind of votes do expose the weakness of the opposition party while still actually fulfilling their legislative intent. Watching republicans now complain about trying to be more fiscally responsible is akin to a homeowner worrying about the water bill while the house is on fire.
  • DLS
    "Its these kind of stunts that have me worried the Dems are going to waste their golden opportunity to fix things by being in Payback mode."

    They don't seem overconfident to me, but rather just stupid and delusionally ambitious. The left wing and the more highly political Dems in Congress are risking loss of voters if they do this, not only because of that behavior itself, but because since Obama's so liberal it's easy for the GOP and the radio talkers to remind everyone that these are the likely kinds of people Obama will turn loose on America and Americans in his administration as well as opening the Congressional cage door.
  • DLS
    I don't believe this is an example of serious Dem overreach, but my reaction is: Can't they simply wait until next year, when they can do largely whatever they want?

    From now until November, with stunts they engage in: Can't they simply wait? (Or are they as childish and unrealistic and impatient as many of their voters, ha ha)
  • NordicAngst
    Key points in these comments:

    "I guess the part about Bush threatening to veto the bill doesn't play at all into the attempt to get a veto-proof majority in the house?"

    A possible alternate explination.

    "Obama's so liberal"

    Only to those with rather low standards.

    "Can't they simply wait until next year, when they can do largely whatever they want?"

    I wouldn't assume to know the outcome of the November election and I'm sure democrats in congress aren't just going to sit around waiting to find out, though I wouldn't mind if this classless poster wanted to take a little time out I wouldn't mind.
  • runasim
    My first impression also was one of this being political games.
    Thinking of it in terms of a veto-proof vote does alter the picture, however..

    Politics is a lot like sports. Strategy is an important component, and it's not always easy to see where strategy ends and trickery begins.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC