<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Victory a &#8216;Watershed&#8217; in American History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/20297/obamas-victory-a-watershed-in-american-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/20297/obamas-victory-a-watershed-in-american-history/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:26:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: barak obama s middle name</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/20297/obamas-victory-a-watershed-in-american-history/comment-page-1/#comment-112844</link>
		<dc:creator>barak obama s middle name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/foreign/20297/obamas-victory-a-watershed-in-american-history/#comment-112844</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runasim</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/20297/obamas-victory-a-watershed-in-american-history/comment-page-1/#comment-135860</link>
		<dc:creator>runasim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/foreign/20297/obamas-victory-a-watershed-in-american-history/#comment-135860</guid>
		<description>If the word &#039;talks&#039; had been in the editorial, we&#039;d have months of blog outrage.&lt;br&gt;I take the omission as a blessing., since normal discussion seem to impossible these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the word &#39;talks&#39; had been in the editorial, we&#39;d have months of blog outrage.<br />I take the omission as a blessing., since normal discussion seem to impossible these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
