An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

George Bush’s Blood Lust For $5 Gasoline

bush_microphones_hand.jpg

Leave it to the deaf, dumb and blind president of the United States to help drive already out-of-control oil prices into the stratosphere by further upsetting the always delicate balance in the Middle East through another round of saber rattling.

It is not unreasonable to conclude at this point that George Bush is so inept that he literally cannot do anything right beyond handing the grieving parents of an Iraq war casualty a medal and folded American flag without dropping them.

The Iraq war has been unique in American history in that the president has worked hard to make it sacrifice free and has largely succeeded. But now we all are feeling the effects of a war without end at the pump and supermarket checkout line even if most of us have not made the connection.

Don’t expect John McCain to do the math for us because he’s too busy beating the bomb Iran war drum with the president. Besides which, $5 gas and spiking food prices are justified because we’re making the Middle East safe for democracy, right?

Analysts described the global oil market as “hysterical” and “shooting itself in the foot” after oil futures jumped a staggering $11 a barrel on Friday to set yet another new record at over $138 a barrel.

This development, combined with still more bleak economic news as the unemployment rate surged to 5.5. percent in May, the biggest increase in more than two decades, further fanned recession fears. Some 330,000 Americans have lost their jobs because of Bush economic policies since the year began, while government unemployment figures do not include the millions of Americas who have run out of benefits and are no longer looking for work.

But while the U.S. may not be technically in recession according to some economic parameters, that is of cold comfort to consumers.

Consider this while you pump $50 worth of gas to fill your thrifty Honda hybrid or $120 to top off your macho-man Chevy pickup truck: Rising inflation continues to eat into your paycheck like the rust around the wheel wells of the car you can’t afford to trade in because you’re so deeply in hock to mortgage and credit card companies. As it is, wages grew at less than a 1 percent rate on an inflation-adjusted basis in the first quarter of the year.

Iran is the second-largest OPEC oil producer and exports nearly two million barrels of black gold a day in a global market with about three million barrels of spare capacity. So a statement by an Israel deputy prime minister that an attack on Iran’s nuculer . . . er, nuclear sites looked “unavoidable” if it did not abandon its nuclear program is all it took for global financial markets to tumble, with the Dow down 394 points, or 3 percent.

And yet again Americans are reminded that the Straits of Hormuz is not a tale about a damsel in distress from the Arabian Nights, but rather a 21-mile-wide passage to the open ocean for 30 percent of the world’s oil supply. Iran controls this choke point, although the U.S. has a large naval presence in the area.

It is ironic that one of the few things that the president cannot do is directly influence global oil prices.

But Bush could have done a lot of things that do influence those prices. These include not stubbornly clinging to a bomb-first-talk-later Iran policy, deregulating financial markets to such devastating effect, and merely paying lip service to the reality that the U.S. must sink many billions of dollars into alternative energy resources if it is to begin to wean itself from dependence on the foreign oil that helped make he and his family rich.

That oil includes blood-strained crude from Saudi Arabia, whose rulers are especially close friends of the Bush clan and spawned most of the 9/11 hijackers, as well as Iraqi oil, the underlying reason for a war that is the biggest reason for runaway gasoline prices.

But don’t try to tell that to a deaf, dump and blind president.

  • Neocon
    Shaun

    Do you not think that 5, 6, 7 dollar a gallon gasoline is precisely what this country needs to make a concerted effort to become energy independent?

    Actually I personally think that the price of oil as a very indirect result of the war in the middle east is a good thing. Certainly it hurts.

    It is a generally accepted fact that until energy becomes painful nothing and I do mean NOTHING will ever be done to change course.

    So 20 years from now the unintended consequences of this folly in the middle east will be the United States weaning itself from the reliance on foreign oil(No im not advocating drilling for more oil) and perhaps a real effort at making alternative energy work.

    When politicians on both sides of the isle are facing growing backlash from 7 or 8 dollar a gallon gasoline. Even Nuclur energy will look good to them.
  • Davebo
    It is a generally accepted fact that until energy becomes painful nothing and I do mean NOTHING will ever be done to change course.


    So you would support a $4.00 per gallon gas tax?

    I didn't think so. But it is humorous seeing you twist so much in defense of Dubya.

    Keep up the good work! America needs Dead Enders!
  • JSpencer
    All the signs were there long before GWB took office, that our energy policies in this country were irresponsible, and while George has certainly contributed to making them worse, we all bear responsibility. That said, the characterization of a president who acts "deaf, dumb and blind" is one that has been earned repeatedly over the course of his term.

    Funny how the word, "conservation" is so seldom heard in discussions about energy. I guess the assumed god-given right among Americans that they should be free to consume without restraint or consequence is sancrosanct. Neocon is right in that regard. We all seem to think the idea of sacrifice shouldnl't include us.
  • Neocon
    Lord almighty. The hate runs so deep from the far left that they cant even carry on a rational conversation.

    Dubya? Defending Bush?

    That is your response to solving energy problems? Well thats certainly helpful.
  • Neocon
    Our energy problems were not created by GWB. They were created by Americans with a thirst for having the best. We fed the oil companies and rejected Nuclear energy and alternative energy because it was cheaper to just buy oil then to do other things.

    Perhaps the energy crisis is being exacerbated by the war in Iraq but that is hardly the problem. 130 dollar a bbl oil is not the problem. Its a symptom of our real problem.

    Until we take the knife to the problem and fix it. Then it will continue to be a problem.
  • Neocon
    From sources readily available on the internet. This one is Time Magazine.

    China ranks as the world's No. 2 oil consumer after the United States, and demand is expected to grow quickly in coming years, driven by strong economic growth and consumer demand as incomes rise.

    December's imports brought the 2007 annual total to 1.1 billion barrels, up 12.3 percent from the 2006 total, according to customs agency data.

    China supplied its fuel needs for decades from domestic fields but rising demand made the country a net importer in the late 1990s. Imports now account for almost 50 percent of consumption.

    The war in Iraq is not insignificant by any means but it is NOT the main reason we have 130 dollar a bbl oil. Pulling out of Iraq will solve a lot of problems but it WILL NOT solve oil prices.

    So quickly now. Go to discus and give me another negative rating as your stamp of approval for wanting to have honest and open discourse on policy problems instead of mindlessly following political talking points.
  • Neocon
    Bad USA.

    More Facts.

    European Union. Population 490,426,060

    Oil imports........17,760,100 as of 2001

    USA. Population 301,139,947

    Oil imports 13,150,100 as of 2004.

    These facts are significant don't you think. We continually try to punish the USA as being this evil nation bent on consuming the worlds resources but as you can see not only is China coming on board but Europe per capita is consuming an equal proportion of oil and gasoline as we are.

    This is a world wide problem. It is not America's fault and I will continue to point out facts each time you guys continue to try and spank the USA or GWB or Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton or whomever you want to blame for Americans greed when in fact we are not any more greedy then the rest of the world.

    Now this is not meant to imply that Europe consumes more total oil then does the United States. The USA still consumes more oil but we are in a position to produce about 7 million bbls per day of our own oil while Europe produces almost none. Still the reason oil is so high is that countries are importing more and more and the production capacity is static.
  • StockBoySF
    The only way Americans will turn to alternative energy is if there is a powerful enough impetus to force us to do so. Otherwise we will continue to burn more oil and pollute the environment.
  • Neocon
    The only way Americans will turn to alternative energy is if there is a powerful enough impetus to force us to do so.

    And this is precisely my point when I said:

    It is a generally accepted fact that until energy becomes painful nothing and I do mean NOTHING will ever be done to change course.

    So for my mind if America, Indeed the world is to address this problem of rising oil prices, pollution and global warming then indeed it must hurt and hurt bad. I think these high prices are precisely what the doctor ordered.

    Now if we could just get Exxon and Chevron and Conoco to spend some of their Billions on alternative power sources in preparation for the coming anarchy against oil then we have indeed accomplished something with the pain that rising gasoline prices have brought us.
  • StockBoySF
    Neocon, yes. And I see your point about gas taxes... I think it's Paul Krugman who also supports a minimum tax on gas- with the tax proceeds going towards the development of clean, renewable energy.

    Ironically I think a big car in America is a status symbol, and now that gas is becoming more and more expensive people can no longer afford that status symbol. Of course I know that's simplistic, but the whole point is the change from gasoline to renewable energy will be hard and it's not going to be "easy street" for Americans.
  • runasim
    For once, I agree with Neocon, at least to a large extent.

    This is a crises that's been heralding its approach for decades, but we ALL ignored. the alarm bells.
    Remember Jimmy Carter and his solar panels? When he wore a sweater instead of turning up the thermostat, he was derided and ridiculed. So, let's not go to the far left vs GWB arena.

    I also think it's limiting, if not outright misleading, to think about oil prices and energy as an isolated problem. It's but one symptom of a short sighted approach to markets and economics. We've been living in the myth that consumer demand is king and markets are the magical solution to all global problems..

    Isolationism means going backwards in a forward moving world, and I reject it. On the other hand, I don't think ignoring domestic conditions for indefinite decades is the solution, either. Otherwise, we are faced with backlash storms and the consequent lurch to the opposite, and equally ill-considered, extreme direction.

    That's where I do fault GWB and his economic advisers, that they didn't heed the increasingly loud alarms on their watch, even though they didn't cause the onset of what constitutes the basis for alarm..

    . The challenge now is, as I see it, to surge forward, but without becoming anchored to any one exclusive solution. The consumer will speak, but he needs to be shepherded with information about and resposibility for consequences. The markets are a great tool, but they lack inherent foresight about connsequences, as well.

    We have to shift to a new way of thinking about these things, a more across the board analysis instead of a piecmeal one. Conservation, environmental concerns and energy demands have to be brought into balance instead of taking a winner take all attitude, for example. .

    Balance, balance balnce.I
  • Of course, the fact that we have something approaching a trillion barrels or barrel-equivalents in our own reach, enough to run this nation for a century, that the Democrats in Congress have worked overtime in putting off-limits over the last thirty years seems to go by the wayside when it's time to throw more tomatoes at the current scapegoat-in-chief.
  • kritt11
    What we need is a "Manhattan Project" for renewable resources-- a federally sponsored partnership between private industry and the government to bring forth innovative ideas on conservation and alternative energy sources. We are way behind the curve. Our government has become so beholden to the oil lobbies that we entered into an unnecessary war in the Middle east. We should have started down the path towards energy independence 30 years ago.
  • kritt11
    I actually agreed with Jimmy Carter. We did not need to have a new generation of Americans buying Hummers and McMansions. We need reinvestment into renewable fuels. The Big 3 are also to blame for failing to respond to the worldwide conditions with smaller cars.
  • JSpencer
    Kritt, your mention of a "Manhattan Project" for renewable resources is an excellent one. If only we had the leadership - and a populace well informed and brave enough to launch on such a project instead of wasting our treasure and potential on bogus wars and all the other downwardly mobile status quo crap.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC