An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

All Political Eyes On Clinton’s Obama Endorsement Tomorrow

_7D6E3229_035B_4FBB_B432_EE5FDC39AD9B_.gif

All political eyes will be on Democratic Senator Hillary Clinton tomorrow when she gives her highly anticipated endorsement of Democratic presumptive Presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama.

Will it be pro-forma? Or will she really show enthusiasm for getting Obama elected? Will she make a plea for unity enthusiastic enough to help bring all but her most angry supporters over to work for and vote to defeat Republican John McCain and elect Obama? Or will it be just enough so she can say she endorsed him enthusiastically but not be sufficient to actually mend the party rift? Will her statement position her in the longterm as a pivotal party uniter, or a pivotal party polarizer?

Party strategists say it’s clear what Clinton needs to do. Will she do it?

Frustrated in defeat, Democrat Hillary Clinton is to endorse U.S. campaign rival Barack Obama on Saturday and party strategists said she needs to set aside any bad feelings and put on a convincing show of unity.

“Feelings on both sides have been pretty heated and a healing process has to go on and it has to begin tomorrow,” said Democratic strategist Doug Schoen, who worked in the Clinton White House.

The sometimes bitter 16-month campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination ended on Tuesday with Obama’s victory over the former first lady, but Clinton raised eyebrows by not immediately conceding defeat.

….The extent of Clinton’s endorsement will be of keen interest to the Obama camp. She gained more than 17 million voters during the Democratic battle, and Obama will need many of those to defeat Republican John McCain in November.

“This is a close election,” said Democratic strategist Steve Elmendorf, a Clinton supporter. “It’s a very important election and people have to come away tomorrow with no doubt about her enthusiasm for him winning in the fall.”

The endorsement’s drama has been heightened due to a few factors that have come into play:

1. A dramatic private meeting between Obama and Clinton at Senator Diane Feinstein’s house yesterday, arranged to trick the press into letting the two top Democrats get some time to talk alone. One good sign: they came out of the meeting laughing (could they have watched a video of McCain’s widely panned primary night speech which was even bluntly panned by seemingly dismayed talking heads on Fox News?).

2. Reports suggesting Clinton is going to look to Obama to help her retire her $30 million campaign debt. If true, she’ll want to give a highly-positive speech tomorrow.

3. Continued evidence via polls that many Democrats would like Obama to have Clinton take the Veep spot on his ticket. Several reporters (print and broadcast) say Mrs. Clinton wants the slot. Other reports say her case was undermined by the lashing-out comments of her husband ex-President Bill Clinton and attempts by some supporters to pressure Obama to put her on the ticket.

The Senator has disavowed such pressure, but a group pushing an Obama-Clinton ticket plans to announce 25,000 signatures of support. Again: it could backfire because Obama will not want to be seen being pushed into making a decision he has not arrived at on his own.

Cartoon by Patrick Chappatte, globecartoon.com

  • crat3
    Sen. Clinton should be the Democratic presidential nominee. Obama did not get the nomination fair and square. He clinched a stolen nomination with hijacked MI delegates, and de facto Obama surrogate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rigged the nomination for Obama.

    Sen. Clinton's supporters in the swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan should work for Obama's defeat and vote for McCain. Obama must win atleast three of these states in November. I will volunteer and vote for McCain in a swing state.

    Sen. Clinton won the primaries for all four swing states. She was the best qualified and the strongest presidential candidate to win the general election in a landslide victory hands down. This was trumped by Pelosi's rigged nomination for Obama.

    The key for Obama to win in November lies with Sen. Clinton's supporters in the swing states; for Obama, that key is lost for 2008 but it opens the door to 2012 for Sen. Clinton, when she can reform a corrupt Democratic Party.
  • Holly_in_Cincinnati
    It will not matter how enthusiastically Sen. Clinton endorses Sen. Obama or works for his election, many if not most of her supporters have no intention of voting for Obama, let alone working for his election.
  • daveinboca
    If Hillary is VP on the ticket, Obama wins but is a one-termer because of her LURKING SPOUSE & his shenanigans. If Hillary is not the VP nominee, Obama loses & her supporters vote for the old battle-scarred war hero.......

    Like the Ayatollah in signing a truce with Saddam, Obama has to "drink the poisoned cup." Choose Hillary, bitter as it is, or lose in the general.....
  • mlhradio
    Please do not feed the Clinton Trolls such as crat3 and HollyinCinninnati. By replying to the Trolls, you are only giving them the attention they crave.
  • jchem
    The more I listen to the Clinton die-hards, the more I think that it's all about her and not about the country...which is the message that I think she sent out to America. Let me ask: Are you serious? Do you really want to sacrifice those beliefs you hold dear to allow McCain to do what he wants? If that's the case, then it's pretty hard to have an honest conversation about politics with you. If you are so embedded with Hillary, then you might as well vote for Nader. Everyone likes to complain about that....
  • StockBoySF
    I'm happy to report that every (ex) Hillary supporter I personally know (including women in the 60's, 70's and 80's- and a couple of those were ardent Hillary supporters) are now supporting Obama. And some of those older women are white and live in places like Ohio, Pennsylvania, California and Alabama. Even though some of these ex-Hillary supporters are independents, they find more in common with Obama than they do with McCain.

    Of course there are some Hillary supporters out there who find more in common with McCain and will vote for him. There's absolutely nothing wrong with voting for the candidate who reflects one's views. I am more than happy to debate the issues with both Obama and McCain supporters as long as the Obama supporters and the McCain supporters seek a genuine dialogue- doesn't even have to be about changing someone's mind as to who to vote for, but I know there are some issues that I am in agreement with McCain and positions I am in agreement with Obama.

    Let the debate over the issues begin!
  • jchem
    crat3 says:

    "Sen. Clinton should be the Democratic presidential nominee. Obama did not get the nomination fair and square. He clinched a stolen nomination with hijacked MI delegates, and de facto Obama surrogate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rigged the nomination for Obama."

    So Obama hijacked the election...even though both of them agreed to the rules put forth? C'mon...I think if you were willing to vote for Hillary, then what really is stopping you from voting for Obama? It's an honest question, looking for an honest answer. What really separates the two? Please, articulate for me, why you would be so willing to vote for Hillary, but not ready to vote for Obama (might I add, a member of the same party).
  • StockBoySF
    "...[Obama's defeat] opens the door to 2012 for Sen. Clinton, when she can reform a corrupt Democratic Party."

    LOL! I have to respond to this, it's just too rich to pass up.... I don't see Hillary pushing for any reforms to the Democratic Party as a Senator.

    And I don't recall seeing Bill as President pushing for any ant-corruption reforms for the Democratic Party.

    Bill and Hillary have had two decades, and have held positions of great power throughout that time to put through such reforms. If anyone really thinks that Hillary will wake up one day to enact these reforms, especially after having all the years, opportunity (and experience to do so) is drinking the same kool aid that Bush and Cheney are, only in mega doses.

    Furthermore, Hillary even helped write the rules declaring that the FL and MI votes wouldn't count. (Well, technically she had her staffers write them, but it was done at her direction and she made speeches about the voters in FL and MI not counting). She did not even trying to overturn that. When it became apparent that FL and MI votes could only help her, because she was losing to Barrack, she asked the Rules and Bylaws Committee to allow the delegates from FL and MI to be seated. She didn't even ask for the rules to be overturned, just the outcome. Talk about corrupt.
  • elrod
    Sorry Holly and crat, but even before Clinton's concession speech Obama is drawing at least 60% of Hillary supporters according to a CNN poll out tonight. Most of the remainder are "undecided" rather than voting for McCain. My guess is most of those undecideds will come back to the Democratic fold.

    A CBS/NYT poll BEFORE the end of the primary showed Obama only losing 12% of Democrats to McCain. In 2004, Kerry lost 8% of Democrats to Bush. And that was when the party ID of the electorate was MUCH more Republican than now.

    And then there's the fact that according to CNN today, 44% of Republicans are dissatisfied with John McCain as their nominee. Roughly 10% of Republicans cross over to Obama. More importantly, the GOP base is demoralized. Conservative Christians - who did all the GOTV legwork for Bush - are tepid at best about McCain. GOP diehards don't trust him at all. If Hillary Clinton were the nominee they'd come out in droves. Just read Peggy Noonan's column today to get a sense of how motivated Republicans were to defeat Clinton. But with Obama, much fewer Republicans will be outraged by him (although I'm sure Sean Hannity will do his best to convince the GOP base that Obama is a Muslim terrorist alien Marxist).

    So, yeah, some people will be lulled by McCain's "experience" in the Senate - the most significant accomplishment being a deeply flawed campaign finance law. Others will find his biography much more compelling than Obama's. But coming on the heels of George W. Bush, I see the number of Democrats actually voting for McCain in November to be very low.
  • elrod
    For some historic context regarding the "my candidate or I vote the other party" threat, check out some of the polling from 2000. 51% of McCain voters in the 2000 primary said they would not vote for Bush. As late as October, that number was still as high as 39%. By November most fell in line so Bush could eke out an Electoral College victory.

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/17/045...

    I believe there was a similar number of Bill Bradley voters refusing to support Gore. Some voted Nader in the end. But most voted for Gore.

    There is always a rump of disgruntled primary voters, and the media (and opposing party) love to exploit them. But they rarely figure much in the general election.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC