An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Let The Battle To Take Back America Begin

01aaobamawins.jpg

In the end, the protean Barack Obama did what was best for the Democratic Party in not declaring that it was over until he had clinched the requisite number of delegates while Hillary Clinton, smiling through gnashed teeth, refused to give the trailblazing nominee in waiting his due. Nevertheless, you can practically feel the tectonic plates of the political universal slide into alignment, and John McCain should be afraid. Very afraid.

01aaa_clinton_small.jpgLet’s first dispose of Mrs. Clinton. Please!

She blazed a trail of her own by squandering the opportunity to become the first woman presidential nominee of a major party by running a campaign that was equal parts ungracious and unconscienable. Her biggest nemesis? Not the upstart senator from Illinois or even the presumptive Republican nominee, but rather Bill Clinton, who to the very end was stepping on her lines and spent the closing days of an extraordinary 16-month battle in which Obama came from 30 points behind defending himself against new allegations that the womanizing that nearly brought down his own presidency – and that he and his wife have never satisfactorily addressed — continues apace.

Meanwhile, Obama’s momentum has been sapped and he is viewed with considerable suspicion by working-class whites and elderly voters – the bread and butter of Democratic politics — as well as the reality that while minorities have made enormous gains, America remains deeply racist. An endorsement from Mrs. Clinton, which will come sooner or later, will do little to alter that demographic mine field.

Nevertheless, there has not been an election in modern American history where the contrast between the two candidates is so stark: Obama representing hope and change and McCain a mockery of those notions, and for that reason alone it is likely that the next occupant of the Oval Office will be a relatively young African American and not a flip-flopping septuagenarian knockoff of a deeply reviled president.

Why should McCain be so afraid?

Because despite the fact Obama won only four of the last 10 primaries, he has energized an enormous and growing base while McCain barely has one. He has raised an extraordinary amount of money from small donors while McCain is being bailed out by the usual fat cats. His grassroots organizing skills, including the possibility that he will have a million volunteers on the street come Election Day, are vastly superior. And with the dubious exception of foreign policy, voters clearly favor Obama on the issues of the day – chief among them the war in Iraq, the economy and health care.

Beyond that, the next five months will be an epic generational battle. Obama will be continuously dogged by allegations that he lacks the requisite experience, as well as a litany of ridiculous negatives ranging from his pastor problem to whether his wife is patriotic enough, but these negatives will be neutralized by the odoriferous reality that McCain is a Washington insider beholden to special interests and in many respects a clone of George Bush.

The contrast between the candidates’ speeches last night could not have been more telling: McCain wrapping himself in the flag while delivering an ineptly somnambulant “You can believe in me” resume recitation and Clinton’s continuing and farcial insinuation that the election was stolen from her versus Obama’s self-effacing nod to his opponents past and future and his vow to lead the U.S. out of the wilderness.

When all was said and done, it was an historic night and one that I dearly wish that my civil-rights activist parents were alive to see. They would have wept tears of joy that their party had chosen a man whose forebears didn’t have the right to vote.

That dutifully noted, let the battle to take back America begin.

Photos by (top) Emmanuel Dunand/AFP-Getty and Elise Amendola/AP

  • superdestroyer
    To say that most people support the Democratic party on the issues is a slight misstatement. what most people support is the idea that the government is going to give them more free stuff ans stick someone else with the bill.

    It is also hard to see that Senator obama is the new way when his policy proposals are most beneficial to the core Democratic party groups l ike public sector employees, college and university employees, the teachers unions, unions in general, and to those NGO's that depend upon the government.

    The real question is would you tell anyone to think about a career in engineering, health care, transportation, or anything in the private sector with the coming on the Democratic supermajority?
  • JSpencer
    "what most people support is the idea that the government is going to give them more free stuff ans stick someone else with the bill. " - SD

    Not very convincing rhetoric in the wake of GWB. So what are all the great things the republicans gave us for all the money we've spent this century so far? Please remind me.
  • superdestroyer
    Since the Bush Administration has been the ultimate in incompetence, why try to repeat it with just different groups getting the government goodies. The Bush Administration has been so bad, the Republican Party is probably going to cease to exist as a relevant political party.

    The government is running $440 billion deficits. Yet, Senator Obama is proposing massive increases in spending. Why not ask how be plans to balance the budget. Unless he either makes massive cuts elsewhere or proposes huge tax increase, I guess that the new way of government spending is going to look like the old way.
  • Manchester2
    Shaun, do you think there is a place for a social conservative within the Democratic party? As I look at the current choices, here's what I see:

    1. Vote for Obama -- This would go against pro-life principles that have been at the forefront of my thinking for years, not to mention my discomfort over his views on gay "marriage." Also, he doesn't come across as much of a fiscal conservative, and his refusal to do anything to fix Social Security troubles me. On the plus side, I like what he has to say about bringing people together, and find him to be a compelling speaker, one I think would make a genuine effort to tamp down partisan bickering in Washington. On the world stage, he would be embraced with open arms, and his emphasis upon diplomacy would be a needed corrective.

    2. A vote for McCain -- I think McCain has understood that terrorism is real, and "making nice" with terrorists is a non-starter. However, his legendary bluster with Senate colleagues could potentially be disastrous in negotiating situations on the world stage. On the positive side, he gets it in regards to global warming (believes in it), and is a strong supporter of the unborn. As a speaker, he's awful, and pales next to Obama.

    So...both choices have their problems. I honestly think that if pro-life Democrat wasn't an oxymoron, I could be one.
  • shaun
    Manchester2:

    This is a toughie, but if your views on abortion trump all, then you will have to hold your nose and vote for McCain, who incidentally has flip-flopped on the issue over the years.

    There are things about Obama that trouble me, not the least of which is his real-world experience, but I voted for him on Super Tuesday and will again in November because we need to take back America from the thugs who have been running it.
  • RememberNovember
    Worked out pretty well in the 90's after GHWB's tenure as President.
    - Bush's ballooning of our Government-turning it into a big brother; cops on every corner and National Guard bitching about smoke breaks when they could have been helping out in oh, say N.O.. Free stuff? I'm not seeing any. unless you include the pittance being mailed out to me that wouldn't cover a month's mortgage...Bush has money to give out when he's spending hundreds of billions on an illegitmate operation? And the dollar is worth how much against the Canadian or Euro.....hmmm.
  • Well, the mainstream Democrats' defense of Choice is part of a framework. You have to remember that the ideal mainstream Democratic social policy also reduces the amount of unwanted pregnancies before they even take place through sex ed, after school programs, etc.
  • runasim
    The problems of social conservatives don't really keep me up at night, because there is no law preventing them from practising social conservatism in their private lives. No law has ever ben proposed requiring anyone to enter into a same-sex marriage or to have abortions.
    We're really talking about social conservatives wanting to enforce their life style on others and resistance to such enforcement.

    Social conservatives and social liberals have vast areas of common concern, one example being teen pregnancy., while another is the fate of unwanted, abused or abandoned children.

    Instead of fighting about that which there is no agreemnet, I think it would be much more fruitful to deal with problems of common concern on a pragmatic level.
    Then, everyone could go home to live as they wish.
    Th Democrats accept and promote several compromise propositions. It's up to individuals to decide if they can live with ocmpromise, or if they would rather devote their time fighting for uncompromised dominance and the backlash to such eforts.
  • Slamfu
    "Unless he either makes massive cuts elsewhere or proposes huge tax increase"

    How bout both? Get out of Iraq and cut the military budget to $300 billion, which still leaves us a bigger budget than the next 9 militaries combined, this will save us $400 billion right there. Then repeal the Bush tax cuts and generate another coupla hundred billion in taxes. Balance the budget, strengthen the dollar, and get us back on track.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC